Using the data in Table 32.3, rank the seven regions of the world according to GDP and then according to GDP per capita.
The rank:
The given regions of the world according to the GDP and then according to the GDP per capita
Explanation of Solution
As per the table given, the rankings are as follows:
Countries | Population
|
GDP per capita
|
Ranking as GDP | |
East Asia and Pacific | I | |||
Latin America and Caribbean | II | |||
South Asia | III | |||
Europe and Central Asia | IV | |||
Middle East and North Africa | V | |||
Sub-Saharan Asia | VI |
Countries | Population
|
GDP per capita
|
Ranking as GDP per capita | |
Latin America and Caribbean | I | |||
Europe and Central Asia | II | |||
East Asia and Pacific | III | |||
Middle East and North Africa | IV | |||
Sub-Saharan Asia | V | |||
South Asia | VI |
Economist measures a nation’s standard of living through its GDP per capita. GDP measures annual economic output that is total value of goods and services produced within a country.
The low-income countries are those which are having GDP per capita income less than
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
Principles Of Macroeconomics V 8.0
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Horngren's Financial & Managerial Accounting, The Financial Chapters (Book & Access Card)
Gitman: Principl Manageri Finance_15 (15th Edition) (What's New in Finance)
Foundations Of Finance
MARKETING:REAL PEOPLE,REAL CHOICES
Corporate Finance (4th Edition) (Pearson Series in Finance) - Standalone book
Horngren's Accounting (12th Edition)
- Which GDP result (current or constant) is more appropriate for comparative purpose with other countries?arrow_forward1960 South Korea Mexico 2012 South Korea Mexico Population, total (in millions) 25 38.7 50 120.8 e GDP (in billions of constant 2005 US$) 27.7 127.6 1165.3 1031.1 Source: World Development Indicators. Calculate per capita GDP for each country and year. Don't use commas or dollar signs, and round to the nearest dollar. • South Korea, 1960: 1108 • Mexico, 1960: type your answer... • South Korea: 2012: 23306 • Mexico, 2012: type your answer... • Did the standard of living rise in both countries? (type either yes or no): type your answer... • Which country saw the greater increase in living standards? type your answer... According to the PPF model, why might this country have had a greater increase in living standards? (Type the letter that corresponds to the best answer.) a. This country created more capital. b. This country's population increased more. c. This country adopted more advanced tecnhology. d. All of the above are consistent with the PPF model and the data. e. (a) and (c) only…arrow_forwardAccording to the pictures How have the variables performed relative to each other?arrow_forward
- Please explain correctly. Economics According to the 2016 Human Development Report (see pp. 198-201), Pakistan fares more poorly in the HDI ranking (148) than in the GNI per capita (PPP US$) ranking (138). Argentina fares better in the HDI ranking (45) than GDP per capita (57). Are these results surprising? How would you explain the discrepancy in the rankings?arrow_forwardthe measurement method of per capita income in Turkey has been changed in 2016.What is wrong with it?What’d happen to GDP per capita if Turkey has not made this revision?Do the other countries also apply such revisions?arrow_forwardcmillan Learning Consider the table of GDP and population for several imaginary countries. $ Country Wrigleyville Longhornland Dinkytown $ Using this information, please answer the questions. If there is not enough information to answer a question, please enter -11. A. What is the GDP per capita of Longhornland in U.S. dollars? Express your answer rounded to one decimal place. 20.6 Incorrect GDP in millions of U.S. dollars Population in millions GDP per capita in U.S. dollars 145.0 125 221.00 128.7 559.0 2913 B. What is the GDP of Dinkytown in millions of U.S. dollars? Express your answer rounded to one decimal place. Incorrect 1.900arrow_forward
- Consider the following data for country A: Population (millions) Real GDP Country ($ billions) 50 A Calculate per capita real GDP (Enter your response rounded to the nearest integer.) Suppose that during the next 10 years, real GDP triples and population doubles in country A. What will per capita real GDP after 10 years have passed? (Enter your response rounded to the nearest integer.) $.arrow_forwardConsider the table of GDP and population for several imaginary countries. Country GDP in millions of U.S. dollars Population in millions GDP per capita in U.S. dollars Wrigleyville 511.0 189.0 Longhornland 2209 167 Dinkytown 243.00 1.100 Using this information, please answer the questions. If there is not enough information to answer a question, please enter −11. A. What is the GDP per capita of Longhornland in U.S. dollars? Express your answer rounded to one decimal place. $ B. What is the GDP of Dinkytown in millions of U.S. dollars? Express your answer rounded to one decimal place. $arrow_forwardWhat is GDP per capita and why is it useful in measuring differences in living standards between different countries?arrow_forward
- Is there a better way to classify a country other than the use of GDP and per capita? Explainarrow_forwardThe following table shows hypothetical values for the real GDP and population for the United States, Japan, Brazil, and Germany in 2016. Complete the table by calculating the real GDP per capita for each country. Instructions: Enter your answers as a whole number. Real GDP and Population, 2016: Select Countries Country United States Japan Brazil Germany Real GDP (millions of Population (millions of dollars) $14,059,255 4,199,260 1,709,488 2,958,902 people) 287 117 186 77 Real GDP per Capita (dollars) $arrow_forwardIn your opinion, will real GDP or per capita real GDP be a better indicator in measuring well-being of a nation?arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax