(a)
Consumption and saving.
(a)
Explanation of Solution
According to the life-cycle model of consumption, the consumption of an individual depends on the income earned in the entire life time of an individual.
The total life time income of the individuals can be calculated as the sum of income they earn in different periods using Equation (1) as follows:
Given that A enjoys $100,000 in three periods and F enjoys $40,000 in period1, $100,000 in period2, and $160,000 in period3, both individuals consume for 5 periods in life.
The life-time income of A can be calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (1) as follows:
Thus, the life-time income of A is $300,000.
The life-time income of F can be calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (1) as follows:
Thus, the life-time income of F is $300,000.
The life-time consumption of individuals can be calculated using Equation (2) as follows:
The life-time consumption of A can be calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (2) as follows:
The life-time consumption of A is $60,000.
The life-time consumption of F can be calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (2) as follows:
The life-time consumption of F is $60,000.
The savings can be calculated as the part of income, which is not consumed. The savings can be calculated using Equation (3) as follows:
The saving in period 1 for A can be calculated by substituting the respective value in Equation (3) as follows:
Thus, A’ savings for period 1 is $40,000.
Table 1 shows the values of savings for A and F in different periods calculated using Equations 1, 2, and 3.
Table 1
A | F | |
S1 | 40,000 | -20,000 |
S2 | 40,000 | 40,000 |
S3 | 40,000 | 100,000 |
S4 | -60,000 | -60,000 |
S5 | -60,000 | -60,000 |
Life-cycle theory: Life-cycle theory developed by Franco Modigliani and Richard Brumberg relates the spending and saving habits of an individual to the course of their life time.
Savings: Savings is defined as that part of income that is not consumed in the current period and is to be used for future consumption.
(b)
The wealth of individuals.
(b)
Explanation of Solution
The wealth of an individual is calculated as the accumulated saving in each period.
The wealth can be calculated using Equation (4) as follows:
The wealth of individual A in the beginning of period 2 is calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (4) as follows:
Thus, the wealth of A in the beginning of period 2 is $40,000.
Table 2 shows the values of wealth for A and F in different periods, which are calculated using Equation 4.
Table 1
A | F | |
W1 | 0 | 0 |
W2 | 40,000 | -20,000 |
W3 | 80,000 | 20,000 |
W4 | 120,000 | 120,000 |
W5 | 60,000 | 60,000 |
W6 | 0 | 0 |
It is evident from the table values that there is no wealth in period1 and period 6.
(c)
The graphical representation of consumption, income, and wealth of the individuals.
(c)
Explanation of Solution
Figure 1 given below shows the consumption, income, and wealth of A.
The horizontal axis of Figure 1 measures the time period, and the vertical axis measures the consumption, income, and wealth. A enjoys a fixed income over the first 3 periods, and hence he also has a constant pattern of consumption as clearly depicted in Figure 1. A saves a part of his income and thus gradually increases his wealth during his earning years and gradually dissaves when he leads his retirement life. His pattern of consumption, income, and wealth is according to the prediction of the life-cycle model.
Figure 2 given below shows the consumption, income, and wealth of F.
The horizontal axis of Figure 1 measures the time period, and the vertical axis measures the consumption, income, and wealth. F increases his income gradually, and this would force him to borrow initially to enjoy a smooth consumption. When his income increases, he would accumulate wealth and then use it for his consumption in the retirement life.
Savings: Savings is defined as that part of income that is not consumed in the current period and is to be used for future consumption.
Dissaving: The act of spending more than earned in the current period or spending the past savings is known as dissaving.
(d)
The impact of borrowing.
(d)
Explanation of Solution
A has fixed income from the initial years of earning, and hence there is no need for him to borrow. Thus, A’s consumption or income will not be affected when there is a borrowing constraint. However, F depends on borrowing for his initial period. When there is a borrowing constraint, F has to spend his entire income of $40,000 in the initial period. For the later periods, he smooths his consumption by dividing the lifetime income across the remaining periods.
The life-time income of F can be calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (1) as follows:
Thus, the life-time income of F is $260,000.
The life-time consumption of F can be calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (2) as follows:
The life-time consumption of F is $65,000.
The saving in period 2 for F can be calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (3) as follows:
Thus, F’s savings for period 2 is $35,000.
The wealth of individual F in the beginning of period 2 is calculated by substituting the respective values in Equation (4) as follows:
Thus, the wealth of A in the beginning of period 2 is $40,000.
Table 2 shows the values of savings and wealth F in different periods, which are calculated using Equations 3 and 4.
Table 1
Period | F's Consumption | F's Savings | F's Wealth |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
1 | 40,000 | 0 | 0 |
2 | 65,000 | 35,000 | 35,000 |
3 | 65,000 | 95,000 | 130,000 |
4 | 65,000 | -65,000 | 65,000 |
5 | 65,000 | -65,000 | 0 |
Figure 3 given below shows the consumption, income, and wealth of F.
The horizontal axis of Figure 1 measures the time period, and the vertical axis measures the consumption, income, and wealth. F increases his income gradually. However, he faces borrowing constraints, and hence he can only use his initial income for consumption. When his income increases, he would accumulate wealth, and then use it for his consumption in the retirement life.
Savings: Savings is defined as that part of income that is not consumed in the current period and is to be used for future consumption.
Dissaving: The act of spending more than earned in the current period or spending the past savings is known as dissaving.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
- Consider the problem of an individual that has Y dollars to spend on consuming over two periods. Let c, denote the amount of consumption that the individual would like to purchase in period 1 and c2 denote the amount of consumption that the individual would like to consume in period 2. The individual begins period 1 with Y dollars and can purchase c1 units of the consumption good at a price P and can save any unspent wealth. Use sı to denote the amount of savings the individual chooses to hold at the end of period 1. Any wealth that is saved earns interest at rate r so that the amount of wealth the individual has at his/her disposal to purchase consumption goods in period 2 is (1+r)s1. This principal and interest on savings is used to finance period 2 consumption. Again, for simplicity, we can assume that it costs P2 dollars to buy a unit of the consumption good in period 2. 2 The individual's total happiness is measured by the sum of period utility across time, u(cı) + u(c2). Let u(c)…arrow_forwardIn the discussion of the life-cycle hypothesis, income is assumed to be constant during the period before retirement. For most people, however, income grows over their lifetimes. How does this growth in income influence the lifetime pattern of consumption and wealth accumulation shown in Figure 17-12 under the following conditions? Consumers can borrow, so their wealth can be negative. Consumers face borrowing constraints that prevent their wealth from falling below zero. Do you consider case (a) or case (b) to be more realistic? Why?arrow_forwardWithin a two-period intertemporal choice setting, a consumer chooses to be a saver at an initial market rate of interest. Which of the following best describes what happens when the rate of interest increases? the income and substitution effects on current consumption will always move in the same direction the income and substitution effects on current consumption will always move in opposite directions the income effect on current consumption will never be larger than the substitution effect А. В. C. D. none of the abovearrow_forward
- In a two-period model, an individual earns and consumes C1 in period 1 and only consumes C2 in period 2. Suppose the saving interest rate is 3.3% and the income in period 1 is $4,500. Assuming consumption smoothing, the consumption (C1 or C2) for period 1 and period 2 should be $ A . Compute A.In a two-period model, an individual earns and consumes C1 in period 1 and only consumes C2 in period 2. Suppose the saving interest rate is 3.3% and the income in period 1 is $4,500. Assuming consumption smoothing, the consumption (C1 or C2) for period 1 and period 2 should be $ A . Compute A.arrow_forwardJack and Jill both obey the two-period Fisher model of consumption. Jack earns $100 in the first period and $100 in the second period. Jill earns nothing in the first period and $210 in the second period. Both can borrow or lend at the interest rate r. a. You observe both Jack and Jill consuming $100 in the first period and $100 in the second period. What is the interest rate r? b. Suppose the interest rate increases. What will happen to Jack’s consumption in the first period? Is Jack better off or worse off than before the interest rate rose?arrow_forwardConsider the following two-period model of consumption and saving: Utility In(C1) + In(C2) C1 C2/(1+r) Y1 + Y2/(1+r) where Y1 = 4, Y2 = 7 and r = 0.14. Find a numerical solution for period 2 consumption, C2. (State your answer to 2 decimal places.)arrow_forward
- Consider an economy where individuals live for two periods only. Their utility function over consumption in periods 1 and 2 is given by U = 2 log(C1) + 2 log(C2), where C1 and C2 are period 1 and period 2 consumption levels respectively. They have labor income of $100 in period 1 and labor income of $50 in period 2. They can save as much of their income in period 1 as they like in bank accounts, earning interest rate of 5 percent per period. They have no bequest motive, so they spend all their income before the end of period 2. a. What is each individual’s lifetime budget constraint? If they choose consumption in each period so as to maximize their lifetime utility subject to their lifetime budget constraint, what is the optimal consumption in each period? How much do the consumers save in the first period? b. Suppose that the government introduces a social security system that will take $10 from each individual in period 1, put it in a bank account, and transfer it back to…arrow_forwardJack and Jill both obey the two-period Fisher model of consumption. Jack earns $100 in the first period and $100 in the second period. Jill earns nothing in the first period and $210 in the second period. Both can borrow or lend at the interest rate r. a. You observe both Jack and Jill consuming $100 in the first period and $100 in the second period. What is the interest rate r?arrow_forward7. Consider the model where an individual has wealth k which they can either save or consume. If they save it, they receive a fixed and exogenous return r. The instantaneous utility function is given by: u(c, k) = c + a(k) where c is consumption, k is wealth, and a(k) is a function that defines the utility that an individual gets from holding wealth. The growth in wealth is given as the returns on wealth rk, plus income from working z(t), minus consumption c(t). a. Write out the differential equation for wealth. b. For an infinite time model, set up the optimal control problem with discounting at a rate 8. c. Write the current-valued Hamiltonian of this problem. d. Derive the steady-state level of consumption.arrow_forward
- 4.4 This chapter argues that saving and spending behavior depend in part on wealth (accumulated savings and in- heritance), but our simple model does not incorporate this effect. Consider the following model of a simple economy: C=50+0.8Y+0.1W I= 200 W= 500 Y=C+I S=Y-C If you assume that wealth (W) and investment (I) remain constant (we are ignoring the fact that saving adds to the stock of wealth), what are the equilibrium levels of GDP (Y), consumption (C), and saving (S)? Now suppose that wealth increases by 100 percent to 1,000. Recalculate the equilibrium levels of Y, C, and S. What impact does wealth accumulation have on GDP? Many were con cerned with the large increase in stock values in the late 1990s. Does this present a próblem for the economy? Explain.arrow_forwardJack and Jill both obey the two-period Fisher model of consumption. Jack earns $200 in the first period and $200 in the second period. Jill earns nothing in the first period and $410 in the second period. Both of them can borrow or lend at the interest rate r. a. You observe both Jack and Jill consuming $200 in the first period and $200 in the second period. What is the interest rate r? b. Suppose the interest rate increases. What will happen to Jack’s consumption in the first period? Is Jack better off or worse off than before the interest rate rise? c. What will happen to Jill’s consumption in the first period when the interest rate increases? Is Jill better off or worse off than before the interest rate increase?arrow_forwardDrawn is the consumption function for Jim. Rachel is economically identical to Jim except in two important aspects. First, while Rachel has the same income as Jim, Rachel has lower expected future income. Second, Rachel has a higher marginal propensity to save than does Jim. Change the consumption function of Jim to reflect a feasible consumption function of Rachel and then answer the following question (scroll down to see the second part). Household Consumer Spending Consumption function Household Current Disposable Incomearrow_forward
- Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage LearningMacroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning