
Concept explainers
a)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the given questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
a)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (6, 8). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equation are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1)and (2)we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
None of the constraints are having slack. Both the ≤ constraints are binding.
(3)
There are no ≥ constraints. Hence, none of the constraints have surplus.
(4)
There are no redundant constraints.
b)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
b)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Constraint 3:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (10, 2). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equations are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1)and (2)we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
None of the constraints are having slack. The time constraint has ≤ and it is binding.
(3)
Durability and strength constraints have ≥ in them. The durability constraint is binding and has no surplus. The strength constraint has surplus as shown below:
The surplus is 15 (39 -24).
(4)
There are no redundant constraints.
c)
To solve: The linear programming problem and answer the questions.
Introduction:
Linear programming:
Linear programming is a mathematical modelling method where a linear function is maximized or minimized taking into consideration the various constraints present in the problem. It is useful in making quantitative decisions in business planning.
c)

Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Calculation of coordinates for each constraint and objective function:
Constraint 1:
Constraint 2:
Constraint 3:
Objective function:
The problem is solved with iso-profit line method.
Graph:
(1) Optimal value of the decision variables and Z:
The coordinates for the profit line is (20, 40). The profit line is moved away from the origin. The highest point at which the profit line intersects in the feasible region will be the optimum solution. The following equation are solved as simultaneous equation to find optimum solution.
Solving (1) and (2) we get,
The values are substituted in the objective function to find the objective function value.
Optimal solution:
(2)
The material and machinery constraint has ≤ and it is binding and has zero slack. The labor constraint has slack as shown below:
The slack is 120 (1,200 – 1,080).
(3)
There are no constraints with ≥. Hence, no constraints have surplus.
(4)
There are no redundant constraints
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
EBK OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT
- Negotiators can gain several benefits from using the strategy of multiple equivalent simultaneous offers. By offering multiple options it reduces the chance of rejection. It also improves the chances of reaching reaching an agreement. By presenting multiple offers, it shows you are flexible. disagree with this post or add on to the postarrow_forwardThe strategy of Multiple Equivalent Simultaneous Offers involves presenting several equally valuable options to the other party during negotiations. This approach benefits negotiators by creating flexibility and increasing the chances of finding a mutually agreeable solution. By offering multiple options, negotiators show that they are open to compromise, which can build trust and make the negotiation process smoother. It also helps avoid getting stuck on one issue, as the other party can choose from several alternatives that meet their needs. In my experience, using MESOs in a work negotiation helped both parties reach an agreement more quickly because each option was carefully thought out to address different needs, and this made it easier for us to settle on one that worked for both sides. This strategy can also reveal what is most important to the other party, helping negotiators understand their priorities better. agree or disagree with the postarrow_forwardExamine the conflicts between improving customer service levels and controlling costs in sales. Strategies to Balance Both customer service levels and controlling costs in sales 1.Outsourcing and workforce optimization 2. AI-driven customer supportarrow_forward
- how can you gain trust in a negotiation setting?arrow_forward✓ Custom $€ .0 .on File Home Insert Share Page Layout Formulas Data Review View Help Draw Arial 10 B B14 ✓ X✓ fx 1400 > 甘く 曲 > 冠 > Comments Editing ✓ . . . P Q R S T 3 A Production cost ($/unit) B с D E F G H J K L M N $74.00 4 Inventory holding cost ($/unit) $1.50 5 Lost sales cost ($/unit) $82.00 6 Overtime cost ($/unit) $6.80 7 Undertime cost ($/unit) $3.20 8 Rate change cost ($/unit) $5.00 9 Normal production rate (units) 2,000 10 Ending inventory (previous Dec.) 800 11 Cumulative 12 13 Month Demand Cumulative Demand Product Production Availability Ending Inventory Lost Cumulative Cumulative Product Sales 14 January 1,400 1,475 15 FUERANZ222222223323333BRUINE 14 February 1,000 2,275 Month January February Demand Demand Production Availability Ending Inventory Lost Sales 1,400 #N/A 1,475 #N/A #N/A #N/A 1,000 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 16 March 1,800 2,275 March 1,800 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 17 April 2,700 2,275 April 2,700 #N/A 2,275 #N/A #N/A #N/A 18 May 3,000 2,275 May 3,000 #N/A…arrow_forwardFollow guidelines and summarize in a paragrapharrow_forward
- Practical Management ScienceOperations ManagementISBN:9781337406659Author:WINSTON, Wayne L.Publisher:Cengage,
