Basis for Conclusions Case 1: Are Employee Stock Options Really an Expense?
U S GAAP did not require companies to expense employee stock options through the income statement prior to 2005 Paragraphs B2 through B11 in the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 123(R) basis for conclusions indicate that reaching an agreement to require employee stock option expensing was a long journey Companies made a number of arguments opposing reporting this expense on their income statements, as laid out in the basis for conclusions in SFAS No 123(R) (paragraphs B16 through B20 and B27 through B32) Provide a brief explanation of each of the arguments, a summary of the response from the standard setters, and your assessment of the appropriateness of the standard setting boards’ responses.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 19 Solutions
INTERMEDIATE ACCOUNTING-MYLAB W/ETEXT
Additional Business Textbook Solutions
Auditing And Assurance Services
Advanced Financial Accounting
PRINCIPLES OF TAXATION F/BUS.+INVEST.
Intermediate Accounting
Financial Accounting, Student Value Edition (4th Edition)
Fundamentals of Financial Accounting
- Which of the following is not true with regard to the relationship between R&D expenses and the value of the company’s stock shares, as perceived by investors and analysts? Multiple Choice: A.There is no evidence that R&D expenses represent value-relevant information to investors. B. There is a causal relationship between R&D expenditures and future financial benefits. C. A $1 increase in R&D expenditures leads to a $5 increase in the market value of the company’s stock shares. D. Analysts adjust estimates of unrecorded R&D assets which are then used to adjust reported earnings and book values.arrow_forwardpros and cons of Sarbanes Oxley (SOX)? why did Enron's accounting go from a traditional historical cost accounting method to a Mark-to Market (MTM) accounting method? protests and outrage from 1993 when FASB tried to close the stock options loopholes?arrow_forwardA company has been using the fair-value method to account for its investment. The company now has the ability to significantly influence the investee and the equity method has been deemed appropriate. Which of the following statements is true? Multiple Choice A cumulative effect change in accounting principle must occur. A prospective change in accounting principle must occur. A retrospective change in accounting principle must occur. The investor will not receive future dividends from the investee. Future dividends will continue to be recorded as revenue.arrow_forward
- Stock dividends and stock splits are similar in that both do not change total stockholders’ equity. (True/False) A company must accrue a liability for sick pay that accumulates but does not vest. (True/False) A company may exclude a short-term obligation from current liabilities if the firm can demonstrate an ability to complete a refinancing. (True/False) Federal income taxes should be included in an employer’s payroll tax expense. (True/False) Whether an employee earns $80,000 a year or $800,000 a year, all of the earnings will be subject to Medicare deductions. (True/False) To record compensated absences as a liability GAAP establishes four criteria. The employer needs to meet any two of these four criteria in order to recognize a liability for compensated absences. (True/False) Stock dividends and stock splits both cause the number of shares outstanding to increase and retained earnings to decrease. (True/False)arrow_forwardCompanies often voluntarily provide non-GAAP earnings when they announce annual or quarterly earnings.These numbers are controversial as they represent management’s view of permanent earnings. The SarbanesOxley Act (SOX), issued in 2002, requires that if non-GAAP earnings are included in any periodic or other reportfiled with the SEC or in any public disclosure or press release, the company also must provide a reconciliationwith earnings determined according to GAAP.Professors Entwistle, Feltham, and Mbagwu, in “Financial Reporting Regulation and the Reporting of ProForma Earnings,” examine whether firms changed their reporting practice in response to the regulations includedin SOX.Required:1. In your library or from some other source, locate the indicated article in Accounting Horizons, March 2006.2. What sample of firms did the authors use in their examination?3. What percent of firms reported non-GAAP earnings (referred to as pro forma earnings by the authors) in2001? In 2003?4.…arrow_forwardCompanies often voluntarily provide non-GAAP earnings when they announce annual or quarterly earnings. These numbers are controversial as they represent management’s view of permanent earnings. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), issued in 2002, requires that if non-GAAP earnings are included in any periodic or other report filed with the SEC or in any public disclosure or press release, the company also must provide reconciliation with earnings determined according to GAAP. Professors Entwistle, Feltham, and Mbagwu, in “Financial Reporting Regulation and the Reporting of Pro Forma Earnings,” examine whether firms changed their reporting practice in response to the regulations included in SOX. Answer the following: What sample of firms did the authors use in their examination? What percent of firms reported non-GAAP earnings (referred to as pro forma earnings by the authors) in 2001? In 2003? What was the most frequently reported adjusting item in 2001? In 2003? What is the authors’ main…arrow_forward
- Which of the following is false? a. Under GAAP, companies cannot record gains on transactions involving their own shares. b. Under IFRS, companies cannot record gains on transactions involving their own shares. c. Under IFRS, the statement of stockholders’ equity is a required statement. d. Under IFRS, a company records a revaluation surplus when it experiences an increase in the price of its common stock.arrow_forwardFirms often provide supplemental disclosures that report and discuss income figures that do not necessarily equal bottom-line net income from the income statement. For example, in Twitter’s initial public offering filings with the SEC, the company reported a net loss of $79.4 million, but prominently disclosed “adjusted EBITDA” of (positive) $21.2 million. Discuss the merits and shortcomings of this managerial practice. Please, don't copy the answer from the book, explain with your words.arrow_forwardIn the deterimination of Non GAAP earnings accountants are permitted to exclude certain nonrecurring charges but they do not have exclude nonrecurring gains Question 34 options: True Falsearrow_forward
- a controller argues that when a company issues stock for less than current value, the value of preexinting stockholders shares is diluted. Is this allowed and right at employee compensation ?arrow_forward1. Of the following, choose the one that describes a situation where liabilities and expenses are manipulated to make a company appear less profitable? A. Liabilities are capitalized to increase revenues. B. Failure to record insurance expense for the period. C. Failure to record employee payroll earned but not paid as of period end. D. Failure to record warranty costs when the facts suggest that disclosure is more appropriate accounting treatment. E. None of the above.arrow_forwardFirms often provide supplemental disclosures that report and discuss income figures that do not necessarily equal bottom-line net income from the income statement. For example, in Twitter’s initial public offering filings with the SEC, the company reported a net loss of $79.4 million, but prominently disclosed “adjusted EBITDA” of (positive) $21.2 million. Discuss the merits and shortcomings of this managerial practice.arrow_forward
- Intermediate Accounting: Reporting And AnalysisAccountingISBN:9781337788281Author:James M. Wahlen, Jefferson P. Jones, Donald PagachPublisher:Cengage LearningCornerstones of Financial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337690881Author:Jay Rich, Jeff JonesPublisher:Cengage Learning