Company’s income under absorption costing.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 19SP

1.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under absorption costing.

1.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

a.

Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is:

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(414,000)
Gross Margin		486,000
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (1)

The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

Working Note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{300})$	80
Total Cost Per Unit	1,380

Table (2)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 380 \\ = $ 414, 000 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(412,500)
Gross Margin		487,500
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		468,500

Table (3)

The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Working note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{320})$	75
Total Cost Per Unit	1,375

Table (4)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 375 \\ = $ 412, 500 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

2.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under variable costing.

a.

2.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (5)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (6)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.

3.

To determine

To explain:

The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.

3.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

• The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.

• The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.

• The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.

• When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.

• From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.

Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

Palladium, Incorporated recently lost a portion of its records in an office fire. The following information was salvaged from the accounting records. Cost of Goods Sold $ 67,000 Work-in-Process Inventory, Beginning 11,300 Work-in-Process Inventory, Ending 9,400 Selling and Administrative Expense 16,000 Finished Goods Inventory, Ending 16,100 Finished Goods Inventory, Beginning ?question mark Direct Materials Used ?question mark Factory Overhead Applied 12,400 Operating Income 14,220 Direct Materials Inventory, Beginning 11,180 Direct Materials Inventory, Ending 6,140 Cost of Goods Manufactured 61,880 Direct labor cost incurred during the period amounted to 1.5 times the factory overhead. The Chief Financial Officer of Palladium, Incorporated has asked you to recalculate the following accounts and to report to him by the end of the day. What is the amount in the finished goods inventory at the beginning of the year?

Which of the following statements is incorrect regarding manufacturing overhead? Multiple Choice Manufacturing overhead includes both fixed and variable costs. Manufacturing overhead is an indirect cost to units or products. Actual overhead costs are used in the cost accounting process. Actual overhead costs tend to remain relatively constant over various output levels.

Palladium, Incorporated recently lost a portion of its records in an office fire. The following information was salvaged from the accounting records. Cost of Goods Sold $ 72,500 Work-in-Process Inventory, Beginning 13,500 Work-in-Process Inventory, Ending 10,500 Selling and Administrative Expense 18,750 Finished Goods Inventory, Ending 19,125 Finished Goods Inventory, Beginning ?question mark Direct Materials Used ?question mark Factory Overhead Applied 13,500 Operating Income 14,825 Direct Materials Inventory, Beginning 11,675 Direct Materials Inventory, Ending 6,525 Cost of Goods Manufactured 67,050 Direct labor cost incurred during the period amounted to 1.5 times the factory overhead. The Chief Financial Officer of Palladium, Incorporated has asked you to recalculate the following accounts and to report to him by the end of the day. What is the amount of direct materials purchased?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 19SP

1.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under absorption costing.

1.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

a.

Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is:

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(414,000)
Gross Margin		486,000
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (1)

The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

Working Note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{300})$	80
Total Cost Per Unit	1,380

Table (2)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 380 \\ = $ 414, 000 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(412,500)
Gross Margin		487,500
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		468,500

Table (3)

The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Working note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{320})$	75
Total Cost Per Unit	1,375

Table (4)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 375 \\ = $ 412, 500 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

2.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under variable costing.

a.

2.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (5)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (6)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.

3.

To determine

To explain:

The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.

3.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

• The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.

• The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.

• The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.

• When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.

• From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.

Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 19SP

1.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under absorption costing.

1.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

a.

Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is:

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(414,000)
Gross Margin		486,000
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (1)

The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

Working Note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{300})$	80
Total Cost Per Unit	1,380

Table (2)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 380 \\ = $ 414, 000 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(412,500)
Gross Margin		487,500
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		468,500

Table (3)

The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Working note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{320})$	75
Total Cost Per Unit	1,375

Table (4)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 375 \\ = $ 412, 500 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

2.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under variable costing.

a.

2.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (5)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (6)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.

3.

To determine

To explain:

The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.

3.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

• The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.

• The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.

• The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.

• When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.

• From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.

Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 19, Problem 19SP

1.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under absorption costing.

1.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

a.

Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is:

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(414,000)
Gross Margin		486,000
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (1)

The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

Working Note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{300})$	80
Total Cost Per Unit	1,380

Table (2)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 380 \\ = $ 414, 000 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(412,500)
Gross Margin		487,500
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		468,500

Table (3)

The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Working note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{320})$	75
Total Cost Per Unit	1,375

Table (4)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 375 \\ = $ 412, 500 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

2.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under variable costing.

a.

2.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (5)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (6)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.

3.

To determine

To explain:

The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.

3.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

• The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.

• The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.

• The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.

• When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.

• From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.

Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 19, Problem 19SP

1.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under absorption costing.

1.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

a.

Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is:

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(414,000)
Gross Margin		486,000
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (1)

The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

Working Note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{300})$	80
Total Cost Per Unit	1,380

Table (2)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 380 \\ = $ 414, 000 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(412,500)
Gross Margin		487,500
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		468,500

Table (3)

The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Working note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{320})$	75
Total Cost Per Unit	1,375

Table (4)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 375 \\ = $ 412, 500 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

2.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under variable costing.

a.

2.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (5)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (6)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.

3.

To determine

To explain:

The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.

3.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

• The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.

• The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.

• The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.

• When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.

• From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.

Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.

Answer 6

Chapter 19, Problem 19SP

1.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under absorption costing.

1.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

a.

Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is:

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(414,000)
Gross Margin		486,000
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (1)

The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

Working Note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{300})$	80
Total Cost Per Unit	1,380

Table (2)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 380 \\ = $ 414, 000 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(412,500)
Gross Margin		487,500
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		468,500

Table (3)

The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Working note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{320})$	75
Total Cost Per Unit	1,375

Table (4)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 375 \\ = $ 412, 500 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Answer 7

Chapter 19, Problem 19SP

1.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under absorption costing.

Answer 8

1.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

a.

Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is:

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(414,000)
Gross Margin		486,000
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (1)

The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

Working Note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{300})$	80
Total Cost Per Unit	1,380

Table (2)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 380 \\ = $ 414, 000 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Absorption Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Cost of Goods sold (working note)		(412,500)
Gross Margin		487,500
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(19,000)
Net Income		468,500

Table (3)

The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Working note:

Calculation of cost of goods sold is,

$Cost of goods sold = Number of units sold \times Cost per unit$

Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,

Particulars	Amount ($) Per Unit
Direct Materials	800
Direct Labor	400
Variable Overheads	100
Fixed Overheads $(\frac{$ 24, 000}{320})$	75
Total Cost Per Unit	1,375

Table (4)

Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula,

$\begin{matrix} Cost of goods sold = 300 \times $ 1, 375 \\ = $ 412, 500 \end{matrix}$

Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.

Answer 9

1.

Expert Solution

Answer 10

1.

Expert Solution

Answer 11

Expert Solution

Answer 12

2.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under variable costing.

a.

2.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (5)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (6)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.

Answer 13

2.

To determine

To compute:

Company’s income under variable costing.

a.

Answer 14

2.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (5)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.

b.

Solution:

Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,

S.R. Company
Income Statement (Variable Costing)
For the Year Ended 2016
Particulars	Amount ($)	Amount ($)
Sales $(300 \times $ 3, 000)$		900,000
Direct Materials $(300 \times $ 800)$	(240,000)
Direct Labor $(300 \times $ 400)$	(120,000)
Variable production Overhead $(300 \times $ 100)$	(30,000)
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost $(300 \times $ 50)$	(15,000)	(405,000)
Contribution Margin		495,000
Fixed Production Overhead	(24000)
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost	(4,000)	(28,000)
Net Income		467,000

Table (6)

Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.

Answer 15

2.

Expert Solution

Answer 16

2.

Expert Solution

Answer 17

Expert Solution

Answer 18

3.

To determine

To explain:

The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.

3.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

• The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.

• The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.

• The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.

• When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.

• From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.

Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.

Answer 19

3.

To determine

To explain:

The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.

Answer 20

3.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

• The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.

• The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.

• The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.

• When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.

• From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.

Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.