Concept explainers
1.
To compute:
Company’s income under absorption costing.
1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
a.
Income statement under absorption costing when 300 workstations are produced is:
S.R. Company | ||
---|---|---|
Income Statement (Absorption Costing) | ||
For the Year Ended 2016 | ||
Particulars | Amount ($) |
Amount ($) |
Sales | 900,000 | |
Cost of Goods sold (working note) | (414,000) | |
Gross Margin | 486,000 | |
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost | (15,000) | |
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost | (4,000) | (19,000) |
Net Income | 467,000 |
Table (1)
The net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.
Working Note:
Calculation of cost of goods sold is,
Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,
Particulars | Amount ($) Per Unit |
---|---|
Direct Materials | 800 |
Direct Labor | 400 |
Variable |
100 |
Fixed Overheads | 80 |
Total Cost Per Unit | 1,380 |
Table (2)
Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,380 for the cost per unit in the above formula,
Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.
b.
Solution:
Income statement under absorption costing when 320 workstations are produced is,
S.R. Company | ||
---|---|---|
Income Statement (Absorption Costing) | ||
For the Year Ended 2016 | ||
Particulars | Amount ($) |
Amount ($) |
Sales | 900,000 | |
Cost of Goods sold (working note) | (412,500) | |
Gross Margin | 487,500 | |
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost | (15,000) | |
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost | (4,000) | (19,000) |
Net Income | 468,500 |
Table (3)
The net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.
Working note:
Calculation of cost of goods sold is,
Where, the cost per unit can be calculated as,
Particulars | Amount ($) Per Unit |
---|---|
Direct Materials | 800 |
Direct Labor | 400 |
Variable Overheads | 100 |
Fixed Overheads | 75 |
Total Cost Per Unit | 1,375 |
Table (4)
Substitute 300 for the number of units and $1,375 for the cost per unit in the above formula,
Thus, the net income under absorption costing at 320 units of production is $468,500.
2.
To compute:
Company’s income under variable costing.
a.
2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
Income statement under variable costing when 300 workstations are produced is,
S.R. Company | ||
---|---|---|
Income Statement (Variable Costing) | ||
For the Year Ended 2016 | ||
Particulars | Amount ($) |
Amount ($) |
Sales | 900,000 | |
Direct Materials | (240,000) | |
Direct Labor | (120,000) | |
Variable production Overhead | (30,000) | |
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost | (15,000) | (405,000) |
Contribution Margin | 495,000 | |
Fixed Production Overhead | (24000) | |
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost | (4,000) | (28,000) |
Net Income | 467,000 |
Table (5)
Thus, the net income under variable costing at 300 units of production is $467,000.
b.
Solution:
Income statement under variable costing when 320 workstations are produced is,
S.R. Company | ||
---|---|---|
Income Statement (Variable Costing) | ||
For the Year Ended 2016 | ||
Particulars | Amount ($) |
Amount ($) |
Sales | 900,000 | |
Direct Materials | (240,000) | |
Direct Labor | (120,000) | |
Variable production Overhead | (30,000) | |
Variable Selling and Administrative Cost | (15,000) | (405,000) |
Contribution Margin | 495,000 | |
Fixed Production Overhead | (24000) | |
Fixed Selling and Administrative Cost | (4,000) | (28,000) |
Net Income | 467,000 |
Table (6)
Thus, the net income under variable costing at 320 units of production is $467,000.
3.
To explain:
The difference in income figures determined in part 1 and part 2 and the way the company should use the information from part 1 and part 2 to make production decision.
3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2698b/2698b129880c27e76a91019c9f73226195062b2d" alt="Check Mark"
Explanation of Solution
• The income statement prepared under variable costing includes the costing of a product on only direct or variable cost, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done only on variable cost and not on the fixed cost.
• The income statement prepared under absorption costing includes the costing of a product on both fixed and variable costs, so, the valuation of the ending inventory is done on both the cost that is fixed and variable.
• The difference in the value of the closing inventory creates the difference in the incomes under the absorption and variable method.
• When the value of closing inventory becomes zero or same under both methods, the difference between their incomes becomes zero. So, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods.
• From the calculation above in part 1 and 2 it can be seen that the income is greater when the company produces 320 units and uses the absorption costing, so, the company should take the income as the measure to take decision regarding production.
Thus, the difference in income between the variable costing and absorption costing is due to the difference in the value of closing inventory under both the methods and the company can take the production decision by looking at the income figures under the two methods.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 19 Solutions
Financial and Managerial Accounting (Looseleaf) (Custom Package)
- Hello teacher please solve questionsarrow_forwardFinancial accounting problemarrow_forwardGinx Enterprises had $250,000 in sales on account last year. The beginning accounts receivable balance was $15,000, and the ending accounts receivable balance was $22,000. The company's average collection period (age of receivables) was closest to: (a) 19.54 days. (b) 36.68 days. (c) 27.02 days. (d) 52.45 days. Need answerarrow_forward
- Sub. General Accountarrow_forwardJasee Corp estimated manufacturing overhead costs for the year to be $600,000. Jasee also estimated 10,000 machine hours and 2,500 direct labor hours for the year. It bases the predetermined overhead allocation rate on machine hours. On February 28, Job 42 was completed. It required 8 machine hours and 2 direct labor hours. What is the amount of manufacturing overhead allocated to the completed job?helparrow_forwardAt the end of the first eof operations under variable costing?arrow_forward
- AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337272094Author:WARREN, Carl S., Reeve, James M., Duchac, Jonathan E.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Accounting Information SystemsAccountingISBN:9781337619202Author:Hall, James A.Publisher:Cengage Learning,
- Horngren's Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis...AccountingISBN:9780134475585Author:Srikant M. Datar, Madhav V. RajanPublisher:PEARSONIntermediate AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259722660Author:J. David Spiceland, Mark W. Nelson, Wayne M ThomasPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationFinancial and Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781259726705Author:John J Wild, Ken W. Shaw, Barbara Chiappetta Fundamental Accounting PrinciplesPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b182e/b182ead1b095d8ccefaffb229bfa04ac12400ae3" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e2103/e21032b5be64fb4be1ad93f02570051e2f9b1134" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8451d/8451d2c849df6f340cc1c0d8ef263275eb000e2b" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8cc3a/8cc3aebff318e5d78fa066fb61cfbacbe48d9a0e" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80ed9/80ed9108f611a258a8549713e1df24712ef58cc7" alt="Text book image"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f16d/7f16dadaa0afbe2dff657416ed3377d32689b928" alt="Text book image"