Microeconomics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260507140
Author: David C. Colander
Publisher: McGraw Hill Education
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 19, Problem 15QE
To determine
The purpose of conspicuous consumption.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
How is the ordinal utility concept different from the cardinal utility concept?
What is cardinal utility theory?
How should I spend my money in order to maximize my utility?”
Chapter 19 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 19.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 19.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 19.A - Prob. 1QECh. 19.A - Prob. 2QECh. 19.A - Prob. 3QECh. 19.A - Prob. 4QECh. 19 - Prob. 1QECh. 19 - Prob. 2QECh. 19 - Prob. 3QECh. 19 - Prob. 4QECh. 19 - Prob. 5QECh. 19 - Prob. 6QECh. 19 - Prob. 7QECh. 19 - Prob. 8QECh. 19 - Prob. 9QECh. 19 - Prob. 10QECh. 19 - Prob. 11QECh. 19 - Prob. 12QECh. 19 - Prob. 13QECh. 19 - Prob. 14QECh. 19 - Prob. 15QECh. 19 - Prob. 16QECh. 19 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 19 - Prob. 1IPCh. 19 - Prob. 2IPCh. 19 - Prob. 3IPCh. 19 - Prob. 4IPCh. 19 - Prob. 5IPCh. 19 - Prob. 6IPCh. 19 - Prob. 7IPCh. 19 - Prob. 8IPCh. 19 - Prob. 9IPCh. 19 - Prob. 10IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- 4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain.arrow_forward4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 a. Determine marginal rate of substitution (MRSXY)between clothes (X) and shoes (Y) for Amir and Budi! Please explain. b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain. c. Considering the relative price between of clothes and shoes, at the current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached exchange equilibrium? Please explain d. Use the Edgeworth Box to illustrate the…arrow_forward4. Two individuals, Amir and Budi, consume two goods, clothes (X) and shoes (Y). The utility functions for the two individuals are given as: Utility function of Amir, UA = 15X0.25Y0.75Utility function of Budi, UB = 25X0.5Y0.5 The current price for clothes (Px) is Rp 100,000 and the current price for shoes (PY) is Rp 150,000 a. Determine marginal rate of substitution (MRSXY)between clothes (X) and shoes (Y) for Amir and Budi! Please explain. b. Amir is currently consuming 5 units of clothes (X) and 10 units of shoes (Y), whereas Budi is consuming 12 units of clothes (X) and 8 units of shoes (Y). At this current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached the efficient allocation of clothes and shoes? If they have, explain why. If they have not, calculate the optimal allocation and explain. c. Considering the relative price between of clothes and shoes, at the current consumption, have Amir and Budi reached exchange equilibrium? Please explain d. Use the Edgeworth Box to illustrate the…arrow_forward
- Matthew Hamming is stranded on an island. He has decided that he will spend exactly 10 hours a day gathering food. He can either spend this time gathering coconuts or catching fish. He can catch 2 fish per hour and he can gather 3 coconuts per hour. Matthew's utility function is U(FC) = 3F0.60.3 a. How many fish should Matthew catch and how many coconuts should he gather so that his consumption maximizes his utility? Illustrate the equilibrium with a graph b. One day a native inhabitant of another island arrives on the island. The visitor offers Matthew trade of 3 fish for 1 coconut. The trade fee costs 1 fish (that must be paid prior to the exchange). Will Matthew decide to trade? What will Matthew produce and consume? Justify your answer and provide a graph.arrow_forwardCan you help me answer these questions it's macroeconomics theoryarrow_forwardYou are considering going to a football game. However, the roads are cover in ice due to bad weather. Your ticket was a gift. You derive a value of z from attending the game, and a cost of D for driving on the icy roads. Your utility function is given by: ug(Z) + ui(D) = In(Z - 3) - In(2 - D). In your ultimate wisdom, you calculate that the cost of driving on the icy roads is 1 unit (So, D=1). What is the minimum value you must obtain from attending the game, so that you decide to go? Solution sent me fast ..arrow_forward
- Q. 4 Economists suggest that common people consciously equate marginal utility with price as they are shopping for groceries, but I don't think anyone else but economists may do this and I suspect even they slip up. It is ridiculous to describe consumer behavior in terms of a theory that consumers have never even heard of. Humans are not super calculators. Many times people buy things on a whim. For example, I buy chewing gum at the checkout counter and it is not on my original list of items to purchase. Discuss Is the Homo Economicus assumption, that is, humans have the super-cognitive ability, are super-rational, and possess full information of all relevant costs, tradeoffs, budget available, and consequences, a reasonable assumption, or is there some other psychological model of consumer behavior that seem s more reasonable and explain observed human behavior well.arrow_forwardThe law of diminishing marginal utility is consistent with the fact that people trade. Do you agree or disagree? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardIf you buy something, you are never ripped off, at least according to the way economists think. If you are willing to spend the money for something, then it has at least that much utility to you. Think about the following three situations: In this very moment A baseball game in a ballpark that does not allow outside food and drink The end a three-mile hike in the desert when you forgot water In each situation, how much would you be willing to pay for the first bottle of water? Would you buy a second bottle of water? If so, how much would you pay? Discuss how utility changes in different circumstances and with each additional unit you buy.arrow_forward
- The following five individuals have different utility functions over food (good x) and clothing (good y): 1) u₁(x, y) = 3x²y 2) u₂(x, y) = 2√x + y 3) Uz(x, y) = x0.6y0.4 4) u₁(x, y) = x² + y² 1 5) us(x, y) = x + 3y For each of these people: a) Compute their marginal utilities of good x, MUx = Ju(x,y) MU, = ду du(x,y) ax b) Check whether the property of "more is better" is satisfied for both goods? Explain. [Hint: Check whether marginal utilities are positive assuming positive amounts of good x and good y] ƏMUX əx and marginal utility of good y, c) Does the marginal utility of good x diminish, remain constant, or increase as each of the individuals buys more x? Explain. [Hint: There are 2 ways to do it: 1) visually check what happens to the expression of MUx when x increases (does it decrease, keep constant or decrease?); or 2) take the partial derivative of this marginal utility with respect to x, that is ƏMUx .aMUX ƏMUX If 0, the marginal utility of x is increasing in x] d) Does the…arrow_forwardDo you think the model of consumer equilibrium describes how people really make the decisions on what to order to in a restaurant to maximize their utility? Is there a better model to measure consumer choice?arrow_forwardHow can business establishments take advantage of the law of diminishing marginal utility?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Exploring Economics
Economics
ISBN:9781544336329
Author:Robert L. Sexton
Publisher:SAGE Publications, Inc