Problem 3 ABC Challenges: Attrition, Balance and Compliance Can television inform people about public affairs? Political scientists Bethany Albertson and Adria Lawrence (2009) conducted an experiment in which they randomly assigned people to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effect of watching TV on a person's information level. Those assigned to the treatment group were told to watch a specific television broadcast and were later asked questions related to what they watched. Those in the control group were not shown the TV broadcast but were asked questions related to the material in the TV broadcast. The dataset contains the following variables: • • • • • • Read News: Dummy variable which =1 if a person reads news and 0 otherwise. Political Interest: interest in political affairs (not interested=1 to very interested=4) Education: years of education Female: female dummy variable (female=1; male=0) Income: family income in thousands of dollars Information Level: information level (low information level=1 to high information level=4) Infromation Level; = Bo+B₁Treatment; + &; Treatment =1 if the individual is assigned to watch the specific television broadcast Treatment=0 if the individual is not assigned to watch the specific television broadcast a. You test for balance using the variables mentioned in the table below. Based on the results do you think that the treatment and control group are balanced? If your answer is "yes" then explain why. If your answer is "no", then explain why and mention how will you address the issue of imbalance. (10 points) Variable Average for treatment group Average for control group Difference t statistic for difference Read News 0.71 0.73 -0.02 0.10 Political Interest 2.59 2.50 -0.09 1.22 Education 16.21 16.00 0.21 0.88 Household Income (in thousands of) Female 20.20 20.09 0.11 0.40 0.54 0.53 0.01 0.12 For parts (b) and (c) suppose that the people in the control group who have political interest decide to watch the TV broadcast. b. Is this an issue of attrition or non-compliance? (5 points) C. Does ẞ still reflect the unbiased causal effect of watching the TV broadcast on Information level? If your answer is "yes" then explain why. If your answer is “no”, Λ then explain how you will interpret ẞ now. (10 points) d. Mention any two limitations of experiments. (10 points)

Microeconomic Theory
12th Edition
ISBN:9781337517942
Author:NICHOLSON
Publisher:NICHOLSON
Chapter7: Uncertainty
Section: Chapter Questions
Problem 7.15P
icon
Related questions
Question
Problem 3
ABC Challenges: Attrition, Balance and Compliance
Can television inform people about public affairs? Political scientists Bethany Albertson and
Adria Lawrence (2009) conducted an experiment in which they randomly assigned people to
treatment and control groups to evaluate the effect of watching TV on a person's information
level. Those assigned to the treatment group were told to watch a specific television
broadcast and were later asked questions related to what they watched. Those in the control
group were not shown the TV broadcast but were asked questions related to the material in
the TV broadcast.
The dataset contains the following variables:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Read News: Dummy variable which =1 if a person reads news and 0 otherwise.
Political Interest: interest in political affairs (not interested=1 to very
interested=4)
Education: years of education
Female: female dummy variable (female=1; male=0)
Income: family income in thousands of dollars
Information Level: information level (low information level=1 to high
information level=4)
Infromation Level; = Bo+B₁Treatment; + &;
Treatment =1 if the individual is assigned to watch the specific television broadcast
Treatment=0 if the individual is not assigned to watch the specific television broadcast
a.
You test for balance using the variables mentioned in the table below. Based on the
results do you think that the treatment and control group are balanced? If your
answer is "yes" then explain why. If your answer is "no", then explain why and mention
how will you address the issue of imbalance. (10 points)
Variable
Average for
treatment group
Average for
control group
Difference
t statistic
for difference
Read News
0.71
0.73
-0.02
0.10
Political Interest
2.59
2.50
-0.09
1.22
Education
16.21
16.00
0.21
0.88
Household Income (in thousands of)
Female
20.20
20.09
0.11
0.40
0.54
0.53
0.01
0.12
For parts (b) and (c) suppose that the people in the control group who have political interest
decide to watch the TV broadcast.
b. Is this an issue of attrition or non-compliance? (5 points)
C. Does ẞ still reflect the unbiased causal effect of watching the TV broadcast on
Information level? If your answer is "yes" then explain why. If your answer is “no”,
Λ
then explain how you will interpret ẞ now. (10 points)
d. Mention any two limitations of experiments. (10 points)
Transcribed Image Text:Problem 3 ABC Challenges: Attrition, Balance and Compliance Can television inform people about public affairs? Political scientists Bethany Albertson and Adria Lawrence (2009) conducted an experiment in which they randomly assigned people to treatment and control groups to evaluate the effect of watching TV on a person's information level. Those assigned to the treatment group were told to watch a specific television broadcast and were later asked questions related to what they watched. Those in the control group were not shown the TV broadcast but were asked questions related to the material in the TV broadcast. The dataset contains the following variables: • • • • • • Read News: Dummy variable which =1 if a person reads news and 0 otherwise. Political Interest: interest in political affairs (not interested=1 to very interested=4) Education: years of education Female: female dummy variable (female=1; male=0) Income: family income in thousands of dollars Information Level: information level (low information level=1 to high information level=4) Infromation Level; = Bo+B₁Treatment; + &; Treatment =1 if the individual is assigned to watch the specific television broadcast Treatment=0 if the individual is not assigned to watch the specific television broadcast a. You test for balance using the variables mentioned in the table below. Based on the results do you think that the treatment and control group are balanced? If your answer is "yes" then explain why. If your answer is "no", then explain why and mention how will you address the issue of imbalance. (10 points) Variable Average for treatment group Average for control group Difference t statistic for difference Read News 0.71 0.73 -0.02 0.10 Political Interest 2.59 2.50 -0.09 1.22 Education 16.21 16.00 0.21 0.88 Household Income (in thousands of) Female 20.20 20.09 0.11 0.40 0.54 0.53 0.01 0.12 For parts (b) and (c) suppose that the people in the control group who have political interest decide to watch the TV broadcast. b. Is this an issue of attrition or non-compliance? (5 points) C. Does ẞ still reflect the unbiased causal effect of watching the TV broadcast on Information level? If your answer is "yes" then explain why. If your answer is “no”, Λ then explain how you will interpret ẞ now. (10 points) d. Mention any two limitations of experiments. (10 points)
AI-Generated Solution
AI-generated content may present inaccurate or offensive content that does not represent bartleby’s views.
steps

Unlock instant AI solutions

Tap the button
to generate a solution

Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomic Theory
Microeconomic Theory
Economics
ISBN:
9781337517942
Author:
NICHOLSON
Publisher:
Cengage
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:
9781337106665
Author:
Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an…
Economics
ISBN:
9781305506381
Author:
James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
ECON MACRO
ECON MACRO
Economics
ISBN:
9781337000529
Author:
William A. McEachern
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
ECON MICRO
ECON MICRO
Economics
ISBN:
9781337000536
Author:
William A. McEachern
Publisher:
Cengage Learning
EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
EBK HEALTH ECONOMICS AND POLICY
Economics
ISBN:
9781337668279
Author:
Henderson
Publisher:
YUZU