Book Title
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337605656
Author: CROSS
Publisher: CENGAGE L
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 18, Problem 7BCP
Summary Introduction
Case summary: The employee K of the store R&K accessed the photos of person J and disseminated them to the public. The person J filed a suit for mental harassment and illegal use of the information against R&K.
To find: Liability of R&K for the tort committed by its employee K.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Title VII covers acts of discrimination, but not retaliation.
True
False
Annalise suffers from a mental illness but is nonetheless capable of working for the Office of Child Support in Wayne County. She was fired from her job when it was learned that she had misappropriated approximately $2,000 in state funds.
Annalise filed a complaint with her union, claiming the DNR violated a state law against discriminating against someone because they suffer from a mental illness. The case went to arbitration, and the arbitrator concluded that Annalise had been dismissed without "just cause," because her acts were caused by her mental illness and were not “within her capacity to control." The county appealed the decision to a court. How should the court rule?
a.
The Court should reverse the arbitrator’s decision because the County’s dismissal of Annalise was not to discriminate against the mentally ill but because she knowingly misappropriated County money.
b.
The Court should void the arbitration agreement (meaning that the agreement is not…
Under what circumstances should a principal (employer) be responsible for the torts committed by an agent (employee)?
If an agent injures a third party during the course of employment, to what extent should the employer be held liable? Under what circumstances should the agent be held personally liable? Provide an example to illustrate your opinion.
What ethical considerations underlie the doctrine of respondeat superior?
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Paula Plaintiff owns Paula’s Boutique, one of the most popular stores in town. William Wicked owns the store next to Paula’s Boutique. William has been jealous of Paula’s success. William, in an effort to increase his own business, begins to tell his customers that Paula is dishonest and unethical. William even puts a sign in his front window warning potential customers not to shop at Paula’s Boutique because of her deceitful and unethical practices. Paula is upset when she finds out what William has been doing. Paula has always been honest and ethical with her customers and now her business is suffering because of William’s dishonesty. Paula decides that something must be done about this situation. What advice would you give Paula? Discuss the possible tort claim Paula might have against William. Be sure to include the elements of the tort and relate those elements to the scenario. If Paula decides to pursue a claim against William, should she consider a lawsuit, mediation, or…arrow_forwardJohnson, president of the First National Bank of A, believes that it is appropriate to employ only female tellers. Hence, First National refuses to employ Ken Baker as a teller but does offer him a maintenance position at the same salary. Baker brings a cause of action against First National Bank. Is First National illegally discriminating based on gender? Why?arrow_forward) Jack was sued by Wowley for defamation, because of statements made by Jack in the public domain, which impugned wrongful, unethical behaviour by Wowley. Samla was subpoena to attend court as a witness, because she was present when Jack made the alleged defamatory statements. Jack as an incentive to Samla to attend court, promised to pay her the sum of $10,000 for her loss of time, but later on reneged on his promise, telling Samla to sue him because he is not giving her one cent. Samla thereafter sued Jack to enforce his promise, with a view to get the promised $10,000. Jack knows you are a Business law student and is seeking your advice on the matter. Please advise Jack.arrow_forward
- What issues must the court decide in this case? John Hitman was fired when he was caught carrying a gun into work. He was hospitalized following the incident and was diagnosed with a mental disorder. His attorney informed the company of his mental status and asked that they delay any decision about his employment status. The company fired John for his clear violation of company rules.arrow_forwardLend Co. discovered that one of its employees, Dana, is an alcoholic. Her manager realized that Dana's alcoholism must be the reason for her absenteeism. To help Dana overcome her alcoholiśm, the employer provided her with counseling services and also asked her to make a firm choice between treatment and discipline. Lend Co. also offered outpatient treatment, and Dana participated in the program without success. When all of these efforts failed, Lend Co. offered to provide inpatient treatment, and Dana refused. Lend Co. fired Dana. According to the courts: O A. Dana has a valid claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act because she willingly participated in the outpatient treatment, even though it did not produce positive results. O B. Lend Co. is not liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it offered a reasonable accommodation, and Dana refused. O C. Lend Co, is liable under the Americans with Disabilities Act because it failed to offer Dana time off from…arrow_forwardMichelle Vinson was an employee of Meritor Savings Bank for approximately four years. Beginning as a tellertrainee, she ultimately advanced to the position of assistant branch manager. Her promotions were based solely upon merit. Sidney Taylor, a vice president of the bank and manager of the branch office in which Vinson worked, was Vinson’s supervisor throughout her employment with the bank. After the bank fired Vinson for her abusive use of sick leave, Vinson brought an action against Taylor and the bank, alleging that during her employment, she had “constantly been subjected to sexual harassment” by Taylor in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Vinson stated that Taylor repeatedly demanded sexual favors from her, fondled her in front of other employees, and forcibly raped her on a number of occasions. Taylor and the bank categorically denied Vinson’s allegations. Does the conduct constitute sexual harassment? Explain.arrow_forward
- In partnership with American Express, Porter Cable requests that all employees at the rank of supervisor and above apply for a corporate credit card to be used for pay for travel, training and similar expenses. Ima Krimnel, the manager of the distribution center, was issued a corporate card and used it to take her husband to Hawaii for their 20th wedding anniversary. If Krimnel does not pay the charges, is Porter Cable liable? Why or why not?arrow_forwardMs. T who was employed with Catamaran Inc. was caught in the act of stealing the company property of her employer. When Ms. T admitted to the commission of the said act to her manager, the latter advised her to just tender her resignation; otherwise, she would face an investigation which would likely lead to the termination of her employment and the filing of criminal charges in court. In the letter of dismissal, the employer also stated that Ms. T qualifications was not as good as those of the other employees and that when the company held a party in her honour for 20 years of service to the company, that she drank too much and had to be taken home by the company’s driver. Acting on her manager’s advice, Ms. T submitted a letter of resignation. Later on, Ms. T filed a case for constructive dismissal against her employer. While Ms. T conceded that her manager spoke to her in a calm and unforceful manner, she claimed that her resignation was not completely voluntary because she was told…arrow_forwardMs. T who was employed with Catamaran Inc. was caught in the act of stealing the company property of her employer. When Ms. T admitted to the commission of the said act to her manager, the latter advised her to just tender her resignation; otherwise, she would face an investigation which would likely lead to the termination of her employment and the filing of criminal charges in court. In the letter of dismissal, the employer also stated that Ms. T qualifications was not as good as those of the other employees and that when the company held a party in her honour for 20 years of service to the company, that she drank too much and had to be taken home by the company’s driver. Acting on her manager’s advice, Ms. T submitted a letter of resignation. Later on, Ms. T filed a case for constructive dismissal against her employer. While Ms. T conceded that her manager spoke to her in a calm and unforceful manner, she claimed that her resignation was not completely voluntary because she was told…arrow_forward
- According to health and safety at work Act: “It shall be the duty of every employer to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare at work of all his employees”. It States that the duty of care of an employer to his employees was established in the civil courts. In many ways, the provisions of the Health and Safety at Work Act are an attempt to codify this duty as part of the criminal law regulating conditions in the workplace. Bearing this in mind, explain the duties required by the Health and Safety at Work Act?arrow_forwardT.W.E., a large manufacturer, prohibited its employees from distributing union leaflets to other employees while on the company’s property. Richard, an employee of T.W.E., disregarded the prohibition and passed out the leaflets before his work shift began. T.W.E. discharged Richard for his actions. Has T.W.E. committed an unfair labor practice? Explain.arrow_forwardThomas worked in the nonmilitary operations of a large firm that produced both military and nonmilitary goods. When the company discontinued the production of nonmilitary goods, Thomas was transferred to the plant producing military equipment. Thomas left his job, claiming that it violated his religious principles to participate in the manufacture of goods to be used in destroying life. In effect, he argued, the transfer to the military equipment plant forced him to quit his job. He was denied unemployment compensation by the state because he had not been effectively “discharged” by the employer but had voluntarily terminated his employment. Did the state’s denial of unemployment benefits to Thomas violate the free exercise clause of the First Amendment?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student Edition
Business
ISBN:9781337407137
Author:Kelly
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...
Business
ISBN:9781337386494
Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana Loewy
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)
Business
ISBN:9780134474021
Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. Steinbart
Publisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...
Business
ISBN:9781259929441
Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. Hult
Publisher:McGraw-Hill Education