(a):
(a):
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity cost of producing a commodity can be calculated by dividing the total quantity of Pearls lost with the Diamonds gained for the country. Country A produces either 150 tons of Diamonds or 75 ton of Pearls. Thus, the opportunity cost can be calculated as follows:
Therefore, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of Diamond is
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of Diamond for Country B is equal to 2 tons of Pearls.
Opportunity cost: Opportunity cost is the cost of the next best alternatives that is foregone while making the choices. When the resources are used for the production of Commodity A, Commodity B that could be made with that same quantity of resource will be the opportunity cost.
(b):
Opportunity cost of producing Pearls.
(b):
Explanation of Solution
The opportunity cost of producing Pearl can be calculated by dividing the total quantity of Diamonds lost with the Pearls gained for the country. Country A produces either 150 tons of Diamonds or 75 ton of Pearl. Thus, the opportunity cost can be calculated as follows:
Therefore, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of Pearl is 2 tons of Pearls in Country A. Similarly, Country B can produce either 90 tons of Diamonds or 180 tons of Pearls. Thus, the opportunity cost of producing Pearl for B can be calculated as follows:
Thus, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of Pearl for Country B is equal to
(c):
Commodity in which A has a
(c):
Explanation of Solution
The
In the case of Country A, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of Diamond is
(d):
Commodity in which Country B has a comparative advantage.
(d):
Explanation of Solution
In the case of Country A, the opportunity cost of producing a ton of Diamond is
From this, it can be identified that Country B could produce Pearls at a lower opportunity cost than Country A. This indicates that Country B has comparative advantage in the production of Pearls.
(e):
Benefit of specialization.
(e):
Explanation of Solution
Country A is in its PPC Curve B where it produces 100 tons of Diamonds and 25 tons of Pearls. Country B is on its PPC curve C where it produces 30 tons of Diamonds and 120 tons of Pearls. Thus, the total output is 130 tons of Diamonds and 145 tons of Pearls. When the country specializes, Country A produces only Diamonds, which is 150 tons and B produces only Pearls, which is 180 tons. Thus, the total output increases due to specialization by 20 tons of Diamonds and 35 tons of Pearls. This can be illustrated in a table as follows:
Diamonds (in tons per year) | Pearls (In tons per year) | |
Before Specialization | ||
A (PPC point at B) | 100 | 25 |
B (PP C point at C) | 30 | 120 |
Total Output | 130 | 145 |
After Specialization | ||
A (PPC point at A) | 150 | 0 |
B (PP C point at D) | 0 | 180 |
Total Output | 150 | 180 |
Thus, the total output of Diamonds and Pearls increases as the economy specializes in the production of commodities in which they have comparative advantages.
(f):
Graphical representation of specialization and trade benefit for the countries.
(f):
Explanation of Solution
When there is no specialization and trade between A and B, Country A operates at PPC point B where it produces and consumes 100 tons of Diamonds and 25 tons of Pearls. The case with Country B is different and it operates at Point C of the PPC where it produces and consumes 30 tons of Diamonds and 120 tons of Pearls. When the country specializes, Country A produces 150 tons of Diamonds and Country B produces 180 tons of pearls.
When the trade takes place, Country A trades 50 tons of Diamonds in exchange for 50 tons of Pearls with Country B. This means that Country A is able to consume 100 tons of Diamonds and 50 tons of Pearl whereas Country B is able to consume 50 tons of Diamonds and 130 tons of Pearls. Thus, both countries are able to achieve a consumption point beyond their PPC which can be illustrated as follows:
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
MACROECONOMICS FOR TODAY
- Imagine that it takes an average Australian miner 10 hours to mine a metric ton of coal and 20 hours to mine a metric ton of manganese. It takes the average South African miner 4 hours to mine a metric ton of coal and 12 hours to mine metric ton of manganese.Create a table to show how productive each miner is in a day. a. In what task does each miner have a comparative advantage? b. Which resource will each country import? How about export? c. Explain how markets provide the opportunity for the mining companies to specialize and earn gains from trade.arrow_forwardAssuming specialization and free trade and using the data in the previous question, if Country A imports 40 TV's and exports 80 wheat, consumption in Country A will be: Wheat Country A Wheat Country B 200 80 50 Television Sets 80 Television Sets 200 wheat and 40 TV's. 280 wheat and 90 TV's. 120 wheat and 80 TV's 120 wheat and 40 TV'sarrow_forwardBelow is the data for the maximum production of the only two products for the countries of Oz and Zas.arrow_forward
- Now suppose that if Zimbabwe uses all of its resources, it can produce 50,000 tons of metal ores or 100,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). Suppose that if South Africa uses all of its resources, it can produce 20,000 tons of metal ores or 80,000 delivery trucks (trading off at a constant rate). What is the direction of trade (who exports what to whom)? Be sure to give the opportunity costs of production of both goods for both countries. What is one potential price of metal ores in terms of trucks at which both Zimbabwe and South Africa would benefit from trade? Rank the autarkic prices and the world price of metal ores from lowest to highest.arrow_forwardIndeed US is spending billions of dollars with other countries for things we need. However, the open trade and the trade agreements allow US also to use its comparative advantage and export the products or services that we have better technology and thus cheaper to provide. For example, we have a comparative advantage on computer technology. Wouldn't this lead to overall benefits for all?arrow_forwardUse the following information to answer question: Assume the standard trade model with two countries (Alpha and Beta), two goods (food and drink), and two factors of production (land and labor). Further assume that Alpha is relatively labor-abundant; food is relatively labor intensive; drink is relatively land intensive. The pre-trade price of food in Alpha is while the pre-trade price of food in Beta is than the price of drink in Alpha than the price of drink in Beta. Greater; greater Less; less Less; greater Greater; Lessarrow_forward
- Assume that Germany has 1200 units of labor available and it can produce two goods: apples and bananas. The unit labor requirement in apple production is 3, while in banana production it is 2. France has a labor force of 800. France’s unit labor requirement in apple production is 5, while in banana production it is 1. How many total units of apples and bananas will be produced in the world after trade?arrow_forwardFrom an economic point of view, India and China are somewhat similar: Both are huge, low-wage countries, probably with similar patterns of comparative advantage, which until recently were relatively closed to international trade. China was the first to open up. Now that India is also opening up to world trade, how would you expect this to affect the welfare of China? Of the United States? (Hint: Think of adding a new economy identical to that of China to the world economy.) A. From China's perspective, the world relative supply curve will shift to the left. This shift will improve China's terms of trade. The U.S. purchases of Chinese exports will hurt the U.S. by decreasing the relative price of goods that the U.S. exports. B. From China's perspective, the world relative supply curve will shift to the right. This shift will worsen China's terms of trade. The U.S. purchase of Chinese exports will benefit the U.S. by increasing the relative price of goods that the U.S. exports. C. From…arrow_forwardRefer to the figure regarding countries A and B. If each country allocated half of its labor force to the production of each good before trade and then each specialize in their comparative advantage and allocate 75 percent of its labor force to the production of that good, world production of good X would change by -- and production of good Y by- Good Y 100 Country B Good X 80 Country A 40 100arrow_forward
- The theories of absolute and comparative advantage have been offered as an economic rationale for trade between and among regions and countries. Compare and contrast the two concepts. Which of the two do you think is more important for explaining the growth in global trade during the last 25 years? Why” The size of a country’s population and the associated age distribution can be causal factors for economic growth. Why is the size of the population important to economic development? Can size be a disadvantage? Why is age distribution important?arrow_forwardG.271.arrow_forwardAntarctica Arctica Frozen fish Party ice Frozen fish Party ice (pounds per week) (pounds per week) 318 and 318 and 212 and 53 212 106 and and 106 and 106 106 212 and 159 and 318arrow_forward
- Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning