In many manufacturing processes, the term work-in-process (often abbreviated WIP) is used. At the LSS Publishing book manufacturing plants, WIP represents the time it takes for sheets from a press to be folded, gathered, sewn, tipped on end sheets, and bound together to form a book, and the book placed in a packing carton. The operational definition of the variable of interest, processing time, is the number of days (measured in hundredths) from when the sheets come off the press to when the book is placed in a packing cartoon. The company has the business objective of determining whether there are differences in the WIP between plants. Data have been collected from samples of 20 books at each production plants. The data, stored in WIP, are as follows:
Completely analyse the data.
Completely analyze the data to determine whether there are differences in the WIP between both plants.
Explanation of Solution
The data is provided for work-in-process (WIP) for Plant A and Plant B. The data has been collected from samples of 20 books at each of the two production plants.
The descriptive statistics of the data can be calculated using the Minitab as follows:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to find the descriptive statistics by Minitab software is as follows:
Enter the data for Plant A and Plant B in the worksheet.
Go to Stat < Basic Statistics < Display Descriptive Statistics.
Click on Variables section.
Double-click C1 Plant A and C2 Plant B to add in the Variables box.
Click on the Statistics option and check the required statistics option.
Click Ok.
The output of Minitab software is:
It can be assumed that the data of the two plants A and B are from independent groups rather being from matched or paired group.
Either the pooled-variance t-test or the separate variance t-test for the difference in two means if the distribution of the time is normal in both plants. If the distribution is not normal, the results of t test can be compared to Wilcoxon rank sum test.
The assumption of Normality can be checked with the help of Minitab software.
The normal probability plot for Plant A is:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to find the descriptive statistics by Minitab software is as follows:
Go to Graph < Probability Plot < Single.
Click Ok.
Click on Variables section.
Double-click C1 Plant A to add in the Graph Variables box.
Click Ok.
The output of Minitab software is:
The normal probability plot for Plant B is
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to find the descriptive statistics by Minitab software is as follows:
Go to Graph < Probability Plot < Single.
Click Ok.
Click on Variables section.
Double-click C1 Plant A to add in the Graph Variables box.
Click Ok.
The output of Minitab software is:
From the obtained normal probability plots, the processing time appears to be right-skewed as they largely deviate from the straight line.
Both the t tests, whether it is pooled variance or similar variance, give relevant result when the parent population follows normal distribution. Nevertheless, a Wilcoxon rank sum test might be more appropriate.
Further, equality of variance should be checked.
Test whether there is difference in variance of processing time of plant A and plant B or not.
Answer to Problem 1CRP
There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the variances of processing time of plant A and plant B differ significantly.
Explanation of Solution
The following steps are followed to test whether variances are equal or not.
Step 1:
The null and the alternative hypotheses are:
Here,
Step 2:
The size of both the samples is 20. The level of significance
Step 3:
The
Step 4:
Use Minitab to find test statistic and
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to perform 2 variances test is given below:
Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2 Variances.
From the drop down, select Each sample is in its own column.
Click on Variables section.
Double-click C1 Plant A to add in the Sample 1 box and double-click C2 Plant B to add in the Sample 2 box.
Click Options and check Use test and confidence interval based in normal distribution.
Click Ok.
The Minitab output shows that the test statistic is 1.64 and
Step 5:
Decision based on the
If
If
Since
At
Test whether the mean processing time of plant A and plant B is different.
Answer to Problem 1CRP
There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is a significant difference in the mean processing time of plant A and plant B.
Explanation of Solution
The following steps are followed to test whether population means are equal or not.
Step 1:
The null and the alternative hypotheses are:
Here,
Step 2:
The size of both the samples is 20. The level of significance
Step 3:
From the above part, it was concluded that the variance processing time of plant A and plant B are significantly not different. Thus, pooled variance
Step 4:
Use Minitab to find test statistic and
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to perform 2 sample t test is given below:
Choose Stat > Basic Statistics > 2-Sample t.
From the drop down, select Each sample is in its own column.
Click on Variables section.
Double-click C1 Plant A to add in the Sample 1 box and double-click C2 Plant B to add in the Sample 2 box.
Click Options.
Tick the option Assume equal variances.
Click Ok.
Click Ok.
The Minitab output shows that the test statistics is
Step 5:
Decision based on the
If
If
Since
There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population means are significantly different.
Test whether the median processing time of plant A and plant B is different.
Answer to Problem 1CRP
There is insufficient evidence to conclude that there is significant difference in the median processing time of plant A and plant B.
Explanation of Solution
The following steps are followed to test the median of the two populations.
Step 1:
The null and the alternative hypotheses are:
Here,
Step 2:
The size of both the samples is 20. The level of significance
Step 3:
From the above parts, it was concluded that the mean processing time of plant A and plant B are significantly not different as well as the population deviate from the normal distribution. Thus, Mann Whitney test (Wilcoxon rank sum test) is used to compare the medians and to validate the results.
Step 4:
Use Minitab to find test statistic and
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to perform 2 sample t test is given below:
Choose Stat > Nonparametrics > Mann-Whitney.
Click on Variables section.
Double-click C1 Plant A to add in the First Sample box and double-click C2 Plant B to add in the Second Sample box.
Click Ok.
The Minitab output shows that test statistics is 345.5 and
Step 5:
Decision based on the
If
If
Since
There is insufficient evidence to conclude that the population medians are significantly different.
Therefore, from the above results, it can be concluded that both t test and Wilcoxon rank sum test give the same result that is processing time of Plant A and Plant B does not differ significantly.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Student Solutions Manual for Basic Business Statistics
- A recent survey of 400 americans asked whether or not parents do too much for their young adult children. The results of the survey are shown in the data file. a) Construct the frequency and relative frequency distributions. How many respondents felt that parents do too much for their adult children? What proportion of respondents felt that parents do too little for their adult children? b) Construct a pie chart. Summarize the findingsarrow_forwardThe average number of minutes Americans commute to work is 27.7 minutes (Sterling's Best Places, April 13, 2012). The average commute time in minutes for 48 cities are as follows: Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Albuquerque 23.3 Jacksonville 26.2 Phoenix 28.3 Atlanta 28.3 Kansas City 23.4 Pittsburgh 25.0 Austin 24.6 Las Vegas 28.4 Portland 26.4 Baltimore 32.1 Little Rock 20.1 Providence 23.6 Boston 31.7 Los Angeles 32.2 Richmond 23.4 Charlotte 25.8 Louisville 21.4 Sacramento 25.8 Chicago 38.1 Memphis 23.8 Salt Lake City 20.2 Cincinnati 24.9 Miami 30.7 San Antonio 26.1 Cleveland 26.8 Milwaukee 24.8 San Diego 24.8 Columbus 23.4 Minneapolis 23.6 San Francisco 32.6 Dallas 28.5 Nashville 25.3 San Jose 28.5 Denver 28.1 New Orleans 31.7 Seattle 27.3 Detroit 29.3 New York 43.8 St. Louis 26.8 El Paso 24.4 Oklahoma City 22.0 Tucson 24.0 Fresno 23.0 Orlando 27.1 Tulsa 20.1 Indianapolis 24.8 Philadelphia 34.2 Washington, D.C. 32.8 a. What is the mean commute time for…arrow_forwardMorningstar tracks the total return for a large number of mutual funds. The following table shows the total return and the number of funds for four categories of mutual funds. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Type of Fund Domestic Equity Number of Funds Total Return (%) 9191 4.65 International Equity 2621 18.15 Hybrid 1419 2900 11.36 6.75 Specialty Stock a. Using the number of funds as weights, compute the weighted average total return for these mutual funds. (to 2 decimals) % b. Is there any difficulty associated with using the "number of funds" as the weights in computing the weighted average total return in part (a)? Discuss. What else might be used for weights? The input in the box below will not be graded, but may be reviewed and considered by your instructor. c. Suppose you invested $10,000 in this group of mutual funds and diversified the investment by placing $2000 in Domestic Equity funds, $4000 in International Equity funds, $3000 in Specialty Stock…arrow_forward
- The days to maturity for a sample of five money market funds are shown here. The dollar amounts invested in the funds are provided. Days to Maturity 20 Dollar Value ($ millions) 20 12 30 7 10 5 6 15 10 Use the weighted mean to determine the mean number of days to maturity for dollars invested in these five money market funds (to 1 decimal). daysarrow_forwardc. What are the first and third quartiles? First Quartiles (to 1 decimals) Third Quartiles (to 4 decimals) × ☑ Which companies spend the most money on advertising? Business Insider maintains a list of the top-spending companies. In 2014, Procter & Gamble spent more than any other company, a whopping $5 billion. In second place was Comcast, which spent $3.08 billion (Business Insider website, December 2014). The top 12 companies and the amount each spent on advertising in billions of dollars are as follows. Click on the datafile logo to reference the data. DATA file Company Procter & Gamble Comcast Advertising ($billions) $5.00 3.08 2.91 Company American Express General Motors Advertising ($billions) $2.19 2.15 ETET AT&T Ford Verizon L'Oreal 2.56 2.44 2.34 Toyota Fiat Chrysler Walt Disney Company J.P Morgan a. What is the mean amount spent on advertising? (to 2 decimals) 2.55 b. What is the median amount spent on advertising? (to 3 decimals) 2.09 1.97 1.96 1.88arrow_forwardMartinez Auto Supplies has retail stores located in eight cities in California. The price they charge for a particular product in each city are vary because of differing competitive conditions. For instance, the price they charge for a case of a popular brand of motor oil in each city follows. Also shown are the number of cases that Martinez Auto sold last quarter in each city. City Price ($) Sales (cases) Bakersfield 34.99 501 Los Angeles 38.99 1425 Modesto 36.00 294 Oakland 33.59 882 Sacramento 40.99 715 San Diego 38.59 1088 San Francisco 39.59 1644 San Jose 37.99 819 Compute the average sales price per case for this product during the last quarter? Round your answer to two decimal places.arrow_forward
- Consider the following data and corresponding weights. xi Weight(wi) 3.2 6 2.0 3 2.5 2 5.0 8 a. Compute the weighted mean (to 2 decimals). b. Compute the sample mean of the four data values without weighting. Note the difference in the results provided by the two computations (to 3 decimals).arrow_forwardExpert only,if you don't know it don't attempt it, no Artificial intelligence or screen shot it solvingarrow_forwardFor context, the image provided below is a quesion from a Sepetember, 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forward
- For context, the images attached below (the question and the related figure) is from a january 2024 past paperarrow_forwardFor context, the image attached below is a question from a June 2024 past paper in statisical modelingarrow_forwardFor context, the images attached below are a question from a June, 2024 past paper in statistical modelingarrow_forward
- Trigonometry (MindTap Course List)TrigonometryISBN:9781337278461Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning