Concept explainers
Single plantwide rate and activity-based costing
Whirlpool Corporation conducted an activity-based costing study of its Evansville, Indiana, plant in order to identify its most profitable products. Assume that we select three representative refrigerators (out of 333): one low-, one medium-, and one high-volume refrigerator. Additionally, we assume the following activity-base information for each of the three refrigerators:
Prior to conducting the study, the factory
Machining Activity | Setup Activity | Sales order Processing Activity | |
Activity rate | $160 | $240 | $55 |
A. Complete the following table, using the single machine hour rate to determine the per-unit factory overhead for each refrigerator (Column A) and the three activity-based rates to determine the activity-based factory overhead per unit (Column B). Finally, compute the percent change in per-unit allocation from the single to activity-based rate methods (Column C). (Round per-unit overhead to two decimal places and percents to one decimal place.)
Product Volume Class | Column A Single Rate Overhead Allocation per Unit | Column B ABC Overhead Allocation per Unit | Column C Percent Change in Allocation (Col. B - Col. A)/Col. A |
Low | |||
Medium | |||
High |
B. Why is the traditional overhead rate per machine hour greater under the single rate method than under the activity-based method?
C. Interpret Column C in your table from part (A).
A.
Single plant-wide factory overhead rate: The rate at which the factory or manufacturing overheads are allocated to products is referred to as single plant-wide factory overhead rate.
Formula to compute single plant-wide overhead rate:
Activity-based costing (ABC) method: The costing method which allocates overheads to the products based on factory overhead rate for each activity or cost object, according to the cost pooled for the cost drivers (allocation base).
Formula to compute activity-based overhead rate:
To compute: The single plant-wide overhead, ABC overhead for all the three products, and the percentage change in the allocation, and complete the Columns A, B, and C in the given table
Explanation of Solution
Complete the blanks for Column A, B, and C.
Product Volume Class | Column A (Single Rate Overhead Allocation Per Unit) |
Column B (ABC Overhead Allocation Per Unit) | Column C (Percent Change in Allocation) |
Low | $30.00 | $58.06 | |
Medium | 30.00 | 29.31 | |
High | 30.00 | 25.46 |
Table (1)
Working Notes:
Compute factory overhead allocated per unit of each product, using single machine rate of $200 per machine hour (MH) (Column A).
Product Volume Class | Single Plant-Wide Overhead Rate | × | Total Number of MH | = | Total Factory Overhead | ÷ | Number of Units | = | Factory Overhead Per Unit |
Low | $200 | × | 24 MH | = | $4,800 | ÷ | 160 | = | $30.00 |
Medium | $200 | × | 225 MH | = | 45,000 | ÷ | 1,500 | = | $30.00 |
High | $200 | × | 900 MH | = | 180,000 | ÷ | 6,000 | = | $30 .00 |
Table (2)
Compute ABC factory overhead allocated per unit of each product (Column B).
Step 1: Compute activity cost allocated per unit of low volume refrigerators.
Activity | Activity-Based Overhead Rates | × | Actual Use of Activity-Base | = | Activity Cost |
Machining | $160 per MH | × | 24 MH | = | $3,840 |
Setup | $240 per setup | × | 14 setups | = | 3,360 |
Sales order processing | $55 per sales order | × | 38 orders | = | 2,090 |
Total activity costs allocated to low volume refrigerators | $9,290 | ||||
Number of units of low volume refrigerators | ÷160 units | ||||
Activity-based overhead cost per unit of low volume refrigerator | $58.06 |
Table (3)
Step 2: Compute activity cost allocated per unit of medium volume refrigerators.
Activity | Activity-Based Overhead Rates | × | Actual Use of Activity-Base | = | Activity Cost Allocated |
Machining | $160 per MH | × | 225 MH | = | $36,000 |
Setup | $240 per setup | × | 13 setups | = | 3,120 |
Sales order processing | $55 per sales order | × | 88 orders | = | 4,840 |
Total activity costs allocated to medium volume refrigerators | $43,960 | ||||
Number of units of medium volume refrigerators | ÷1,500 units | ||||
Activity-based overhead cost per unit of refrigerator | $29.31 |
Table (4)
Step 3: Compute activity cost allocated per unit of high volume refrigerators.
Activity | Activity-Based Overhead Rates | × | Actual Use of Activity-Base | = | Activity Cost Allocated |
Machining | $160 per MH | × | 900 MH | = | $144,000 |
Setup | $240 per setup | × | 9 setups | = | 2,160 |
Sales order processing | $55 per sales order | × | 120 orders | = | 6,600 |
Total activity costs allocated to high volume refrigerators | $152,760 | ||||
Number of units of high volume refrigerators | ÷6,000 units | ||||
Activity-based overhead cost per unit of refrigerator | $25.46 |
Table (5)
Compute the percent change in the allocation (Column C).
Product Volume Class | Column B (ABC Overhead Allocation Per Unit) | ˗ | Column A (Single Rate Overhead Allocation Per Unit) |
÷ | Column A (Single Rate Overhead Allocation Per Unit) |
= | Percent Change in Allocation |
Low | $58.06 | ˗ | $30.00 | ÷ | $30.00 | = | 93.53% |
Medium | 29.31 | ˗ | 30.00 | ÷ | 30.00 | = | (2.3)% |
High | 25.46 | ˗ | 30.00 | ÷ | 30.00 | = | (15.1)% |
Table (6)
Note: refer to Tables (2), (3), (4), and (5) for value and computation of Column A and Column B values.
B.
To discuss: The reasons for the difference in machine rate under single plant-wide approach and ABC approach
Explanation of Solution
The machine hour rate under ABC, $160 per machine hour, as computed in Part (1), is different from the $200 single machine rate under single plant-wide approach. This is because the ABC method allocates all the overheads based on the activities under production. So, setup and sales order processing activities are allocated their share in factory overheads.
C.
To discuss: The percent change in allocation (Column C)
Explanation of Solution
As per the ABC method, low volume refrigerator has high activity cost per unit comparatively. This is because this product consumes high overheads for the setup activity with highest cost. The company could reduce the cost of setup activity.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 18 Solutions
Bundle: Financial & Managerial Accounting, Loose-Leaf Version, 14th + CengageNOWv2, 2 terms Printed Access Card
- Financial accounting questionsarrow_forwardNot use ai solution..arrow_forwardWhat role does assurance boundary definition play in attestation? a) Standard limits work always b) Boundaries never matter c) All areas need equal coverage d) Engagement scope limits determine verification responsibilities. Want answer to this accounting mcqarrow_forward
- Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337912020Author:Carl Warren, Ph.d. Cma William B. TaylerPublisher:South-Western College PubFinancial And Managerial AccountingAccountingISBN:9781337902663Author:WARREN, Carl S.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning