Bundle: Principles of Economics, Loose-leaf Version, 8th + LMS Integrated MindTap Economics, 2 terms (12 months) Printed Access Card
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781337607735
Author: N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 17, Problem 9PA
Subpart (a):
To determine
The dominant strategy and Nash equilibrium.
Subpart (b):
To determine
The dominant strategy and Nash equilibrium.
Subpart (c):
To determine
The dominant strategy and Nash equilibrium.
Subpart (d):
To determine
The dominant strategy and Nash equilibrium.
Subpart (e):
To determine
The dominant strategy and Nash equilibrium.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
9. Little Kona is a small coffee company that is consider-
ing entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each
company's profit depends on whether Little Kona
enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low
price:
Little
Kona
Enter
Don't
Enter
High Price
Kona makes
$2 million
Kona makes
zero
Big Brew
Brew makes
$3 million
Brew makes
$7 million
Kona loses
$1 million
Low Price
Kona makes
zero
Brew makes
$1 million
Brew makes
$2 million
Suppose Proctor & Gamble (PG) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) are simultaneously considering new advertising campaigns. Each firm may choose a high, medium or low level of advertising.
a. What are each firm’s best responses to its rival’s strategies?
b. Does either firm have a dominant strategy?
c. What is the Nash equilibrium in this game?
Little Kona is a small coffee company that is considering entering a market dominated by Big Brew. Each company's profit depends on whether Little Kona enters and whether Big Brew sets a high price or a low price:
True or False: Only Little Kona has a dominant strategy in this game.
True or False
Which of the following outcomes represent a Nash equilibrium in this case? Check all that apply.
Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona enters.
a.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona enters.
b.Big Brew maintains a high price and Little Kona does not enter.
c.Big Brew maintains a low price and Little Kona does not enter.
Big Brew threatens Little Kona by saying, “If you enter, we're going to set a low price, so you had better stay out.”
True or False: Little Kona should not believe the threat.
True or False
If the two firms could collude and agree on how to split the total profits, what outcome would they…
Chapter 17 Solutions
Bundle: Principles of Economics, Loose-leaf Version, 8th + LMS Integrated MindTap Economics, 2 terms (12 months) Printed Access Card
Ch. 17.1 - Prob. 1QQCh. 17.2 - Prob. 2QQCh. 17.3 - Prob. 3QQCh. 17 - Prob. 1CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 2CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 3CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 4CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 5CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 6CQQCh. 17 - Prob. 1QR
Ch. 17 - Prob. 2QRCh. 17 - Prob. 3QRCh. 17 - Prob. 4QRCh. 17 - Prob. 5QRCh. 17 - Prob. 6QRCh. 17 - Prob. 7QRCh. 17 - Prob. 1PACh. 17 - Prob. 2PACh. 17 - Prob. 3PACh. 17 - Prob. 4PACh. 17 - Prob. 5PACh. 17 - Prob. 6PACh. 17 - A case study in the chapter describes a phone...Ch. 17 - Prob. 8PACh. 17 - Prob. 9PA
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The above table shows the payoffs that either Darrin or Rob receive depending on whether they choose a high or a low price strategy. Who has a dominant strategy? A. Darrin. B. Rob. C. Darrin and Rob. D. Neither Darrin nor Rob.arrow_forwardCOUNTRY B HIGH TARIFF LOW TARIFF HIGH TARIFF $1M $1 M $2M, $1.5 M COUNTRY A LOW $1.5 M, $ 2M $3м, $3 м TARIFF 1. What is the dominant strategy for: a. Country A b. Country B Is there an equilibrium dominant strategy for this game? 2. Find the Nash equilibrium a. Outcome = (High, high) b. Outcome = (High. Low) c. Outcome = (Low, high) d. Outcome = (Low, low) 3. What is the Maximin strategy for Country A and Country B? C.arrow_forward1. Two electricity firms compete in the same market and are deciding their level of advertising in order to increase customers and profits. The following matrix shows the profits (in millions) according to the strategy chosen: Firm 1 Strategies Low Advertising Aggressive Advertising Firm 2 Low Advertising 15, 15 20, -2 Aggressive Advertising -2, 20 5,5 a. Identify the one-shot Nash equilibrium. Comment. b. Suppose the players know this game will be repeated exactly 10 times. Can they achieve payoffs that are better than the one-shot Nash equilibrium? Explain. c. Suppose this game is infinitely repeated and the interest rate is 5%. Can the players achieve the collusive outcome? Explain.arrow_forward
- Answer all the questions, show all the working. Consider the following game in normal form. Not cooperate Cooperate Not cooperate 20,20 50,0 Cooperate 0,50 40,40 What is Nash equilibrium? Is it efficient? Why? What needs to be complied with so that the players would like to cooperate? What happens when one of the players does not cooperate? Why? Define trigger strategy. Calculate the discount factor (δ) that would make both players decide to cooperate.arrow_forwardUse the following normal-form game to answer the following questions. a. For what values of x is strategy D (strictly) dominant for player 2? b. For what values of x is strategy B (strictly) dominant for player 1? c. For what values of x is (B, D) the only Nash equilibrium of the game?arrow_forwardA small town has a duopoly in its tattoo market. Two firms, "Thread the Needle" and "Ink about it" are both competitors. Daily profit is listed in the payoff matrix. The green payouts belong to "Thread the Needle" and the red, "Ink about it". In this game, what is the Nash Equilibrium? A Thread the Needle: don't advertise, Ink about it: don't advertise B Thread the Needle: don't advertise, Ink about it: advertise C Thread the Needle: advertise, Ink about it: advertise D Thread the Needle: advertise, Ink about it: don't advertisearrow_forward
- Exercise A.2 . Sinergy and Dinaco are the only two companies in a high-tech industry. They are faced with the following matrix of results when deciding their research budget: After analizing the graph, answer the following questions... a) Does Sinergy have a dominant strategy? Reason your answer. b) Does Dinaco have a dominant strategy? Reason your answer. c) Is there a Nash equilibrium in this scenario? Reason your answer.arrow_forwardSuppose that Green Giant and Red Rover are two companies competing in the canned vegetable market. Each is contemplating an aggressive new ad campaign. The payoffs of each decision are listed below, where Green Giant is player 1. Green/Red Ad Campaign No Ad Campaign |Ad Campaign |1 million, 1 million zero, 3 million No Ad Campaign 3 million, zero 2 million, 2 million What is the Nash equilibrium of the game? a. (advertise, don't advertise) b. (advertise, advertise) c. (don't advertise, don't advertise) d. (don't advertise, advertise)arrow_forward3) Amazon and Target both sell the new Xbox, and have a choice whether to charge a high price or a low price. The payoff matrix identifies the profit either store can expect to make (in millions of dollars). Walmart High Price Low Price High Price b. Identify the Nash Equilibrium. 3,6 5,5 Amazon Low Price 2.8 4.3 a. Identify the Dominant Strategy for either player, or write "none" if there isn't one.arrow_forward
- Fill in the chart attached and answer the following questions: a) Bert's dominant strategy is to: (pick the correct answer below ) - no dominant strategy - fish for 20 hours per week -fish for 40 hours per week. b) Ernie's dominant strategy is to: ( pick the correct answer below) - no dominant strategy - fish for 20 hours per week -fish for 40 hours per week. c) Is there a Nash Equilibrium? ( pick the correct answer below) - No - Yes, both fish for 20 hours per week - Yes, one fisher for 40 and the other for 20. - Yes both fish for 30 hours per week. d) Is there an incentive for Bert and Ernie to collude? Why or why not?arrow_forwardAnswer the following questions: 1.What is the Nash Equilibrium of this game? 2. Does Starbucks have dominant pricing strategy, given these predicted payoffs? Does Dunkin' Donuts have a dominant pricing strategy, given these payoffs? Explain. 3. Is this game an example of a prisoner's dilemma? Why or why not?arrow_forwardConsider the following game in normal form. Not cooperate Cooperate Not cooperate 20,20 50,0 Cooperate 0,50 40,40 What is Nash equilibrium? Is it efficient? Why? What needs to be complied with so that the players would like to cooperate? What happens when one of the players does not cooperate? Why? Define trigger strategy. Calculate the discount factor (δ) that would make both players decide to cooperate.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Principles of MicroeconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781305156050Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Microeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781305156050
Author:N. Gregory Mankiw
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning