Genetic Analysis: An Integrated Approach (2nd Edition)
Genetic Analysis: An Integrated Approach (2nd Edition)
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780321948908
Author: Mark F. Sanders, John L. Bowman
Publisher: PEARSON
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 17, Problem 27P
Summary Introduction

To analyze:

After recognition of an enhancer trap line created by P element transposition in Drosophila in which the marker gene from the enhancer trap is particularly expressed in the wing imaginal disc.

To outline the procedure used to recognize the gene contiguous to the insertion site of the enhancer trap.

To outline the procedure that reveals the expression pattern of the enhancer trap line and reveal the internal gene expression pattern of the contiguous gene.

Introduction:

Enhancer trapping is the method which allows the hijacking of an enhancer from another gene; therefore, it is useful for the identification of the enhancer. This method combines a large number of random insertion mutants with the expression of a reporter gene. The reporter gene is merged with a minimal promoter, which is insufficient to drive a detectable expression of the reporter gene used in the enhancer trapping methods. It utilizes the potential of the genomic enhancer and silencer that lie outside the construction. The expected mutation, induced by transposons, would be the insertional mutation because the additional bases are added to the original gene. The insertion of an additional base pair in the gene sequence leads to the frameshift mutation.

Therefore, the mutagenesis experiment is expected to have either gain-of-function or the loss of function mutation depending on the insertion of a base pair in the transposon. The gain of function would cause overexpression of the gene inserted adjacent to the transposons, in contrast, if it is inserted into the coding region, it would show the loss of function.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
You aim to test the hypothesis that the Tbx4 and Tbx5 genes inhibit each other's expression during limb development. With access to chicken embryos and viruses capable of overexpressing Tbx4 and Tbx5, describe an experiment to investigate whether these genes suppress each other's expression in the limb buds. What results would you expect if they do repress each other? What results would you expect if they do not repress each other?
You decide to delete Fgf4 and Fgf8 specifically in the limb bud. Explain why you would not knock out these genes in the entire embryo instead.
You implant an FGF10-coated bead into the anterior flank of a chicken embryo, directly below the level of the wing bud. What is the phenotype of the resulting ectopic limb?  Briefly describe the expected expression domains of 1) Shh, 2) Tbx4, and 3) Tbx5 in the resulting ectopic limb bud.

Chapter 17 Solutions

Genetic Analysis: An Integrated Approach (2nd Edition)

Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Biology (MindTap Course List)
Biology
ISBN:9781337392938
Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. Berg
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Human Heredity: Principles and Issues (MindTap Co...
Biology
ISBN:9781305251052
Author:Michael Cummings
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Biology: The Dynamic Science (MindTap Course List)
Biology
ISBN:9781305389892
Author:Peter J. Russell, Paul E. Hertz, Beverly McMillan
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Biology Today and Tomorrow without Physiology (Mi...
Biology
ISBN:9781305117396
Author:Cecie Starr, Christine Evers, Lisa Starr
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Biology 2e
Biology
ISBN:9781947172517
Author:Matthew Douglas, Jung Choi, Mary Ann Clark
Publisher:OpenStax
Text book image
Concepts of Biology
Biology
ISBN:9781938168116
Author:Samantha Fowler, Rebecca Roush, James Wise
Publisher:OpenStax College