How do you feel about the creation and then sacrifice of an early- stage human embryo to produce stem cells for a transplant patient? Should it be permitted?
To review:
Ethical aspects of creation and sacrifice of an early-stage human embryo to produce stem cells for a transplant patient.
Introduction:
The cells that can differentiate into other different types of cells are known as stem cells. Apart from differentiating into different types of cells of the body, these cells can also divide to form new stem cells. This allows them to act as precursors for the production of different types of cells. Mammals contain two different types of stem cells, namely the embryonic as well as adult stem cells. The embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are obtained from a developing embryo. These cells have the ability to differentiate into all the different types of cells found in the body. However, the adult stem cells are more limited and can only differentiate into fewer types of body cells.
Due to the ability of embryonic stem cells to differentiate into all possible stem cells, they are a good target as a therapeutic agent for a transplant patient. They are able to create new healthy cells of the tissue or organ that needs to be transplanted.
Explanation of Solution
Embryonic stem cells offer a very promising solution to a number of diseases and medical conditions. It involves the production of an embryo and then destroying it to extract the embryonic stem cells. This offers many applications. However, there has been an ongoing debate about the ethical aspects of the sacrifice of a human embryo ever since this research began. People may argue that it is unethical to create an embryo and then sacrifice it. The argument states that as soon as the embryo is born, it is a living human and killing it would essentially be like murder.
Others might debate that killing at that stage is harmless as the embryo used is still in the early stages and has not differentiated. At that stage, it does not have an identity as a developed human being. They might also say that the benefit of using the stem cells for the treatment outweighs the harm that is caused by killing it. While some people might view it as abortion, others might think it is not the same since the embryo is at a relatively early stage of development.
It cannot be said what is right and what is not since ethical issues involve different perspectives and there is no right or wrong answer. The people, who think that sacrificing an embryo is right if it is being used for the treatment of diseases, support the use of embryonic stem cells. However, the people who do not believe in the sacrifice do not support the argument.
Research is being carried out to figure out ways to extract embryonic stem cells from early-stage embryos without actually killing them. This, if successful, might end the debate against using ESCs for transplant completely as the embryos would survive and live on.
Therefore, it can be concluded that the embryonic stem cells hold a great potential in the treatment of many diseases and in transplant patients. However, the aspect of creating and sacrificing an embryo raises ethical issues. People support and deny the argument based on their perspectives. A way, if derived to extract embryonic stems without destroying the embryo, the debate might get dissolved completely.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 17 Solutions
EBK HUMAN BIOLOGY
- examples of synamtomorphy.arrow_forwardE. Bar Graph Use the same technique to upload the completed image. We will use a different type of graph to derive additional information from the CO2 data (Fig A1.6.2) 1. Calculate the average rate of increase in COz concentration per year for the time intervals 1959-1969, 1969- 1979, etc. and write the results in the spaces provided. The value for 1959-1969 is provided for you as an example. 2. Plot the results as a bar graph. The 1959-1969 is plotted for you. 3. Choose the graph that looks the most like yours A) E BAR GRAPH We will use a different type of graph to derive additional information from the CU, data (rig. nive). Average Yearly Rate of Observatory, Hawall interval Rate of increase per year 1959-1969 0.9 1969-1979 1979-1989 1989-1999 1999-2009 Figure A1.6.2 1999-2009 *- mrame -11- -n4 P2 جية 1989-1999 1979-1989 1969-1979 1959-1969 This bar drawn for you as an example 1.0 CO, Average Increase/Year (ppmv) B) E BAR GRAPH We will use a different type of graph to derive…arrow_forwardUse the relationships you just described to compute the values needed to fill in the blanks in the table in Fig A1.4.1 depth (a) 1.0 cml 0.7 cml cm| base dimensions (b, c)| 1.0 cm| 1.0 cm| 1.0 cm 1.0 cm| 1.0 cm| 1.0 cm volume (V) 1.0_cm' cm'| cm'| density (p) 1.0 g/cm'| 1.0 g/cm 1.0 g/cm' mass (m)| 0.3 g Column 1: depth at 1.0 cm volume mass Column 2: depth at 0.7 cm volume mass Column 3: unknown depth depth volumearrow_forward
- San Andreas Transform Boundary Plate Motion The geologic map below of southern California shows the position of the famous San Andreas Fault, a transform plate boundary between the North American Plate (east side) and the Pacific Plate (west side). The relative motion between the plates is indicated by the half arrows along the transform plate boundary (i.e., the Pacific Plate is moving to the northwest relative to the North American Plate). Note the two bodies of Oligocene volcanic rocks (labeled Ov) on the map in the previous page located along either side of the San Andreas Fault. These rocks are about 23.5 million years old and were once one body of rock. They have been separated by displacement along the fault. 21. Based on the offset of these volcanic rocks, what is the average annual rate of relative plate motion in cm/yr? SAF lab 2.jpg Group of answer choices 0.67 cm/yr 2 cm/yr 6.7 cm/yr 1.5 cm/yr CALIFORNIA Berkeley San Francisco K Os Q San Andreas Fault Ov…arrow_forwardThese are NOT part of any graded assignment. Are there other examples of synapomorphy. What is it called when the traits retained are similar to ancestors?arrow_forwardPlease hand draw everying. Thank you! Draw a gram positive bacterial cell below. Your cell should have the following parts, labeled: A coccus shape A capsule The gram positive cell wall should have the peptidoglycan labeled, as well as its component parts (NAM, NAG, and teichoic acid) A cell membrane Fimbriae A nucleoid Ribosomes Inclusionsarrow_forward
- Draw a gram negative bacterial cell below. Your cell should have the following parts, labeled: A bacillus shape Fimbriae Amphitrichous flagella 2 membranes (outer and inner) The outer membrane should have lipopolysaccharide (LPS) with lipid A and O antigens Periplasmic space The thin peptidoglycan cell wall between the 2 membranes A nucleoid Ribosomes Inclusionsarrow_forwardBacterial species Cell wall type Example: S. mitis Gram positive S. epidermidis H. pylori M. bovis S. marcescens Shape and arrangement Coccus, streptococcus Drawing 0000000arrow_forwardDraw a gram positive bacterial cell below. Your cell should have the following parts, labeled: A coccus shape A capsule The gram positive cell wall should have the peptidoglycan labeled, as well as its component parts (NAM, NAG, and teichoic acid) A cell membrane Fimbriae A nucleoid Ribosomes Inclusionsarrow_forward
- Human Heredity: Principles and Issues (MindTap Co...BiologyISBN:9781305251052Author:Michael CummingsPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Biology (MindTap Course List)BiologyISBN:9781337392938Author:Eldra Solomon, Charles Martin, Diana W. Martin, Linda R. BergPublisher:Cengage LearningBiology: The Unity and Diversity of Life (MindTap...BiologyISBN:9781305073951Author:Cecie Starr, Ralph Taggart, Christine Evers, Lisa StarrPublisher:Cengage Learning