Concept explainers
Consider a 3-sigma control chart with a center line at µ0 and based on n = 5. Assuming normality, calculate the
a. µ0 + .5σ
b. µ0 − σ
c. µ0 + 2σ
a.
Find the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
Answer to Problem 7E
The probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
Consider, a 3-sigma control chart based on center line
Calculation:
It is known that for a 3-sigma chart the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
It is known that, for a random variable X that follows normal distribution with mean
Thus,
Now, for
According to table A.3, “Standard Normal Curve Areas” of Appendix the standard normal variable value for
Thus,
Thus, the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
b.
Find the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
Answer to Problem 7E
The probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
It is known that for a 3-sigma chart the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
It is known that, for a random variable X that follows normal distribution with mean
Thus,
Now, for
According to table A.3, “Standard Normal Curve Areas” of Appendix the standard normal variable value for
Thus,
Thus, the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
c.
Find the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
Answer to Problem 7E
The probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
It is known that for a 3-sigma chart the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
It is known that, for a random variable X that follows normal distribution with mean
Thus,
Now, for
According to table A.3, “Standard Normal Curve Areas” of Appendix the standard normal variable value for
Thus,
Thus, the probability that a single point will fall outside the control limits when the actual process mean is
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
WEBASSIGN ACCESS FOR PROBABILITY & STATS
- T1.4: Let ẞ(G) be the minimum size of a vertex cover, a(G) be the maximum size of an independent set and m(G) = |E(G)|. (i) Prove that if G is triangle free (no induced K3) then m(G) ≤ a(G)B(G). Hints - The neighborhood of a vertex in a triangle free graph must be independent; all edges have at least one end in a vertex cover. (ii) Show that all graphs of order n ≥ 3 and size m> [n2/4] contain a triangle. Hints - you may need to use either elementary calculus or the arithmetic-geometric mean inequality.arrow_forwardWe consider the one-period model studied in class as an example. Namely, we assumethat the current stock price is S0 = 10. At time T, the stock has either moved up toSt = 12 (with probability p = 0.6) or down towards St = 8 (with probability 1−p = 0.4).We consider a call option on this stock with maturity T and strike price K = 10. Theinterest rate on the money market is zero.As in class, we assume that you, as a customer, are willing to buy the call option on100 shares of stock for $120. The investor, who sold you the option, can adopt one of thefollowing strategies: Strategy 1: (seen in class) Buy 50 shares of stock and borrow $380. Strategy 2: Buy 55 shares of stock and borrow $430. Strategy 3: Buy 60 shares of stock and borrow $480. Strategy 4: Buy 40 shares of stock and borrow $280.(a) For each of strategies 2-4, describe the value of the investor’s portfolio at time 0,and at time T for each possible movement of the stock.(b) For each of strategies 2-4, does the investor have…arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Negate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forwardQuestion 6: Negate the following compound statements, using De Morgan's laws. A) If Alberta was under water entirely then there should be no fossil of mammals.arrow_forwardNegate the following compound statement using De Morgans's laws.arrow_forward
- Characterize (with proof) all connected graphs that contain no even cycles in terms oftheir blocks.arrow_forwardLet G be a connected graph that does not have P4 or C3 as an induced subgraph (i.e.,G is P4, C3 free). Prove that G is a complete bipartite grapharrow_forwardProve sufficiency of the condition for a graph to be bipartite that is, prove that if G hasno odd cycles then G is bipartite as follows:Assume that the statement is false and that G is an edge minimal counterexample. That is, Gsatisfies the conditions and is not bipartite but G − e is bipartite for any edge e. (Note thatthis is essentially induction, just using different terminology.) What does minimality say aboutconnectivity of G? Can G − e be disconnected? Explain why if there is an edge between twovertices in the same part of a bipartition of G − e then there is an odd cyclearrow_forward
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill