
Why private economic forecasters compete to sell their services help to constrain behavioral tendencies for too much optimism in projections of real
Concept introduction:
Both private-sector and other government forecasters have more modest expectations than the Trump administration. His administration is making detailed projections that the economy will expand much faster in the decade ahead than it has in recent years — a
The administration forecasts growth in the neighborhood of 3 percent through the next decade, compared with around 2 percent projected by private forecasters and the economists at the Congressional Budget Office and the Federal Reserve.
If the administration’s forecast comes true, it will indicate an economy 12 percent bigger in 2028 than that had been projected by the more cautious forecasts — an extra $2.8 trillion in economic activity that year, in today’s dollars. Yet, it would require some of the strongest improvements in productivity seen in decades, yet also require that interest rates do not react the way they have historically when growth strengthens.

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 16 Solutions
Economics Today: The Macro View (19th Edition) (Pearson Series in Economics)
- Suppose there is a new preventative treatment for a common disease. If you take the preventative treatment, it reduces the average amount of time you spend sick by 10%. The optimal combination of Z (home goods) and H (health goods). both may increase both may increase or one may stay the same while the other increases. both may decrease H may increase; Z may not change Z may increase; H may decreasearrow_forwardIn the Bismarck system,. may arise. neither selection both adverse and risk selection ☑ adverse selection risk selectionarrow_forwardPls fill out/explain to me these notes and explanations, thanksarrow_forward
- Simple explanations plsarrow_forwardThis question examines the relationship between the Indian rupee (Rs) and the US dollar ($). We denote the exchange rate in rupees per dollar as ERS/$. Suppose the Bank of India permanently decreases its money supply by 4%. 1. First, consider the effect in the long run. Using the following equation, explain how the change in India's money supply affects the Indian price level, PIN, and the exchange rate, ERS/$: AERS/STIN ERS/$ - ·TUS = (MIN - 9IN) - (Mus - gus). MIN 2. How does the decrease in India's money supply affect the real money supply, in the long PIN run. 3. Based on your previous answer, how does the decrease in the Indian money supply affect the nominal interest rate, UN, in the long run? (hint: M = L(i)Y hold in the long run) 4. Illustrate the graphs to show how a permanent decrease in India's money supply affects India's money and FX markets in the long run. (hint: you may refer to the figures on lecture slides #5, titled "Analysis in the long run.") 5. Illustrate the…arrow_forwardPlease explain the concept/what this fill in graph, thanksarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





