Book Title
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337605656
Author: CROSS
Publisher: CENGAGE L
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 16, Problem 6BCP
Summary Introduction
Case summary:Company D has set out some safety standards for franchisees to follow but provided that franchisee is an independent contractor. The franchisee is free to use its own means and mode. The company MP is a franchisee of the company D. A vehicle driven by the delivery boy of the company MP got struck and killed the person R.
To find: The liability of the company D for negligence.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
Does any part(s) of the Florida Public Health utilize Certificate of Need (CON) regulations? Are there any neighboring states which do so?
How does, if they do, CON regulations ensure an adequate supply of healthcare resources? Does the utilization of the CON provide citizens of any of those states with high quality healthcare?
Operational risks include legal risks.
Select one:
True
False
The Lloyd’s Register Group (LRG) provides independent assurance for quality to companies operating high-risk, capital-intensive assets in the energy and transportation sectors, to enhance the safety of life,property, and the environment. This helps its clients to create safe, responsible, and sustainable supplychains. Safety has been at the heart of LRG’s work since 1760 and the company invests time, money, andresources to fulfill Lloyd’s Register’s mission: to protect life, property, advance transportation,engineering education, and research. LRG helps ensure a safer world through their broad knowledge, deep experience, and close relationships. LRG is also one of the world leaders in assessing business processes and products to internationally recognized standards. The standards are either those of major independent bodies or ones that LRG haveDeveloped themselves. From process design to in-service operations and decommissioning, LRG aims to deliver complete lifecycle and risk…
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forward
- Rubatex Corporation manufactures rubber and foam for a variety of products, including artificial turf housing and insulation, hockey helmet liners, scuba diving suits, sports sandals and mouse pads. The company was purchased by an investment firm called American industrial partners (AIP) that has so far earned only a 1 percent return on its investment. Obviously the company is having problems. Its sales are up but earnings are down. In the first three months after acquisition, the company lost $2 million on $68 million in sales. Understandably, AIP wants to know why and is demanding aggressive action. Employees at the Bedford, Virginia, plant say they know something’s wrong. The plant is hot and dirty and crumbling, and they are working harder to produce items of poorer quality. Fewer than 7 of 10 orders are shipped on time, and 2% of sales are returned as defective. Built in 1924, the plant sprawls over 14 buildings, with only the offices and lunchroom air-conditioned. Equipment is…arrow_forwardTimber Solution Ltd., a communications equipment manufacturer, recently fell victim to a fraud scheme developed by one of its employees. To understand the scheme, it is necessary to review Timber Solution’s procedures for the purchase of services. The purchasing assistant is responsible for ordering services (such as repairs to a photocopy machine or office cleaning) after receiving a service requisition from an authorised manager. However, because no tangible goods are delivered, a receiving report is not prepared. When the Accounting Department receives an invoice billing Timber Solution for a service call, the accounts payable assistant calls the manager who requested the service to verify that it was performed. The fraud scheme involves Johnson Parry, the manager of plant and facilities. Johnson arranged for a company, Bamber Services, to be placed on Timber Solution approved supplier list. On several occasions, Johnson would submit a requisition for services to be provided by…arrow_forwardNeed a monitoring and response plan for operation of tobaco manufacturingarrow_forward
- Being the department manager of the Supply chain of a courier company, how can the issues of supply chain be resolved, particularly the problem of delivering wrong order.arrow_forwardDistinguish the differences between norms, rules, and standard operating procedures (SOPs).arrow_forwardTerraCycle Ltd management is keen on providing excellent quality products and services. They have asked you to examine how Service Quality and Total Quality Management could improve the quality of their Recycling Programmes. Produce a briefing paper examining the quality of the recycling/ reuse programmes offered by TerraCycle and evaluating the appropriateness of the two quality approaches for the company. Within your briefing paper, you should: Explain and differentiate between the two approaches (Service Quality and Total Quality Management). Provide an example from the recycling/ reuse programmes of how one of these two approaches is applied. Explain the appropriateness of the approach taken, what it takes to do, what it should deliver and suggest how it could be improved following the selected approach.arrow_forward
- create a effective business description about a business named " Automotive repair shop" that caters Technical Education And Skills Development Authority (TESDA) and accepts OJT of automotive or mechanical engineering students.arrow_forwardHas the Australian government adopted a system engineering approach in its management of COVID-19? Explain your answer.arrow_forwardIdentify a disruption of a business and supply chain that has recently affected a company. What should the company have done before this disruption occurred to mitigate its impact?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Purchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Purchasing and Supply Chain Management
Operations Management
ISBN:9781285869681
Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. Patterson
Publisher:Cengage Learning