Person PG and person BL were in a relationship. During the relationship they acquired joint ownership over two properties, an electronic service Centre and an apartment. The deed of apartment was in name of BL, but none of them paid the down payment. Both the parties mutually agreed to share rights over the property, profit and losses and equal right in management of the property. When their relationship ended, PG argued that there was a partnership agreement between them, but BL refused by contending that PG and BL did not have written partnership agreement. To find: Partnership between person PG and person BL,

Question

To Partner or Not to Partner John Willis, who is 27 and single, had just completed his fifth year of employment as a carpenter for a very small homebuilder. His boss, the sole owner of the company, is Tyrone Young. A few days ago, Tyrone asked John if he would like to become a partner, which he could do by contributing $70,000. In turn, John would receive 40 percent of all prof- its earned by the business. John had saved $30,000 and could borrow the balance from his grandmother at a low-interest rate, but he would have to pay her back within 15 years. John was undecided about becoming a partner. He liked the idea but he also knew there were risks and concerns. He decided to talk to Tyrone at lunch. Here is how the conversation went. John: I've been giving your offer a lot of thought, Tyrone. It's a tough decision and I don't want to make the wrong one. So I'd like to chat with you about some of the problems involved in running a business. Tyrone: Sure. I struggled with these issues…

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 16, Problem 3BCP

Summary Introduction

Case summary:Person PG and person BL were in a relationship. During the relationship they acquired joint ownership over two properties, an electronic service Centre and an apartment. The deed of apartment was in name of BL, but none of them paid the down payment. Both the parties mutually agreed to share rights over the property, profit and losses and equal right in management of the property. When their relationship ended, PG argued that there was a partnership agreement between them, but BL refused by contending that PG and BL did not have written partnership agreement.

To find: Partnership between person PG and person BL,

Expert Solution & Answer

Trending nowThis is a popular solution!

See solution

Check out sample textbook solution

Students have asked these similar questions

To Partner or Not to Partner John Willis, who is 27 and single, had just completed his fifth year of employment as a carpenter for a very small homebuilder. His boss, the sole owner of the company, is Tyrone Young. A few days ago, Tyrone asked John if he would like to become a partner, which he could do by contributing $70,000. In turn, John would receive 40 percent of all prof- its earned by the business. John had saved $30,000 and could borrow the balance from his grandmother at a low-interest rate, but he would have to pay her back within 15 years. John was undecided about becoming a partner. He liked the idea but he also knew there were risks and concerns. He decided to talk to Tyrone at lunch. Here is how the conversation went. John: I've been giving your offer a lot of thought, Tyrone. It's a tough decision and I don't want to make the wrong one. So I'd like to chat with you about some of the problems involved in running a business. Tyrone: Sure. I struggled with these issues…

A, B and C were in general partnership business. Because of wrong decision taken by Mr.C the business got losses, which even the business assets cannot cover those liabilities and all of the partners will be subjected for unlimited liabilities. Who will be liable for the business debts and has to use personal property to pay for the losses. Select one: a. Partner B b. Partner C c. Partner A d. All the partners

Klinicki and Lundgren, both furloughed Pan Am pilots stationed in West Germany, decided to start their own charter airline company. They formed Berlinair, Inc., a closely held Oregon corporation. Lundgren was president and a director in charge of developing the business. Klinicki was vice president and a director in charge of operations and maintenance. Klinicki, Lundgren, and Lelco, Inc. (Lundgren’s family business), each owned one-third of the stock. Klinicki and Lundgren, as representatives of Berlinair, met with BFR, a consortium of Berlin travel agents, to negotiate a lucrative air transportation contract. When Lundgren learned of the likelihood of actually obtaining the BFR contract, he formed his own solely owned company, Air Berlin Charter Company (ABC). Although he continued to negotiate for the BFR contract, he did so on behalf of ABC, not Berlinair. Eventually BFR awarded the contract to ABC. Klinicki commenced a derivative action on behalf of Berlinair and a suit against…