Annual growth rate in real
Explanation of Solution
The annual growth rate in real GDP per capita can be calculated as follows:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the annual grow rate of real GDP per capita in the U.S.
Real GDP per capita annual growth rate is 0.22%.
Table 1 shows the real GDP per capita annual growth rate for different countries, which is obtained using equation (1).
Table -1
Country | Real GDP per capita 1974 | Real GDP per capita 1974 | Annual growth rate |
U.S | 28,734 | 52,152 | 0.22% |
E.S | 2,577 | 3,919 | 0.14% |
RSA | 6,560 | 7,727 | 0.49% |
CA | 234 | 1,065 | 0.98% |
RU | 8,282 | 11,436 | 0.10% |
Table-1 shows that the annual growth in real GDP per capita is higher in Cambodia from 1980 to 2016, and the lowest real GDP per capita is in El Salvador. United States holds the third position.
Convergence theory states that the growth rates of countries that are less developed will exceed the growth rate of developed countries if the less developed countries are allowing to catch-up the growth. Therefore, this theory is also called as the catch-up theory. In Table-1, the highest growth rate is achieved by the country Cambodia (CA), 0.98% which is greater than the growth rate of the United States (US), where the convergence theory is consistent. But in the case of other countries, such as El Salvador (ES), Republic of South Africa (RSA), and Russia (RU), they are not consistent with convergence theory. Because the growth rates of these countries did not significantly exceed the growth rates of United States. Therefore, in short, the majority of data in Table-1 is not consistent with the convergence theory.
Convergence theory: This theory states that the growth rate of less developed nations will exceed the growth rate of highly developed nations if they allow the less developed nations to catch up.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 16 Solutions
EBK PRINCIPLES OF MACROECONOMICS
- 3. Consider the market for paper. The process of producing paper creates pollution. Assume that the marginal damage function for pollution is given by: MDF = 3E where damages are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. Assume further that the function describing the marginal abatement cost of emissions is given by MAC 120-E where benefits are measured in dollars and E is the level of emissions. a. Graph the marginal damage function (MDF) and the marginal abatement cost function (MAC). b. What is the unregulated level of emissions Eu? What is the social welfare of this emissions level? c. Assume an existing emission quota limits emissions to E = 60. Show on the graph why this policy is inefficient. What is the deadweight loss caused by this policy?arrow_forwardshow written calculation for Barrow_forwardProblem 1: 1. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 5%? 2. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 forever, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8%? 3. If a stock is expected to pay an annual dividend of $20 this year, what is the approximate present value of the stock, given that the discount rate is 8% and dividends are expected to grow at a rate of 2% per year?arrow_forward
- d-farrow_forwardG please!arrow_forward4. Consider two polluting firms, with the marginal abatement costs of polluters 1 and 2, respectively, equal to MAC₁ = 20-E1 MAC2 = 12-E2 a. What is the unregulated level of pollution for each firm? b. Assume policymakers have decided to cut the level of pollution in half. The way they intend to accomplish this goal is to require both firms to cut their pollution in half. What are the total costs of abatement from the policy? And how are these costs distributed between the firms? c. Is this uniform quota on emissions across firms the most cost-effective manner in which to reduce emissions by 50%?arrow_forward
- Don't used hand raiting and don't used Ai solutionarrow_forwardThanks in advance!arrow_forwardI need help figuring this out. I'm pretty sure this is correct?If Zambia is open to international trade in oranges without any restrictions, it will import 180 tons of oranges.I can't figure these two out: 1) Suppose the Zambian government wants to reduce imports to exactly 60 tons of oranges to help domestic producers. A tariff of ???? per ton will achieve this. 2) A tariff set at this level would raise ????in revenue for the Zambian government.arrow_forward
- 16:10 ← BEC 3701 - Assignments-... KWAME NKRUMAH UNIVERSITY TEACHING FOR EXCELLENCE SCHOOL OF BUSINESS STUDIES DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS AND FINANCE ADVANCED MICRO-ECONOMICS (BEC 3701) Assignments INSTRUCTIONS: Check instructions below: LTE 1) Let u(q1,q2) = ln q₁ + q2 be the (direct) utility function, where q₁ and q2the two goods. Denote P₁ and P2 as the prices of those two goods and let M be per period money income. Derive each of the following: a) the ordinary or Marshallian demand functions q₁ = d₂ (P₁, P₂, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] b) the compensated or Hicksian demand functions q₁ = h₂ (P₁, P2, M) for i = 1,2 [3 Marks] c) the Indirect Utility Function uº = v(P₁, P2, M) [3 Marks] d) the Expenditure Function E(P1, P2, U°) [3 Marks] e) Draw a diagram of the solution. There should be two graphs, one above the other; the first containing the indifference curves and budget constraint that characterize the solution to the consumer's choice problem; the second characterizing the demand…arrow_forwardHow would you answer the question in the News Wire “Future Living Standards”? Why?arrow_forwardal Problems (v) T (ix) F 1. Out of total number of 2807 women, who were interviewed for employment in a textile factory, 912 were from textile areas and the rest from non-textile areas. Amongst the married women, who belonged to textile areas, 347 were having some work experience and 173 did not have work experience, while for non-textile areas the corresponding figures were 199 and 670 respectively. The total number of women having no experience was 1841 of whom 311 resided in textile areas. Of the total number of women, 1418 were unmarried and of these the number of women having experience in the textile and non-textile areas was 254 and 166 respectively. Tabulate the above information. [CA. (Foundation), May 2000 Exactly (14) of the total employees of a sugar mill were these were married and one-halfarrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education