MICROECONOMICS
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781266686764
Author: Colander
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15, Problem 5QAP
(a)
To determine
The reason why mergers occur if they are not especially profitable.
(b)
To determine
Explain the new policy of government on merging.
(c)
To determine
The best antitrust policy that is apt for today’s economy.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
Part 1. Suppose that you overhear a foursome of physicians on the golf course discussing the prices they
charge for an office visit. Suppose further that you hear them reach an agreement to all charge a fee of $
100 for an office visit. What is such an agreement called in antitrust policy, and what antitrust law may
have been violated? Part 2. Suppose that emergency room services in the city of Frederiksberg are
provided by three hospitals. Two of the hospitals each have a market share of 40% and the third hospital
has a market share of 20%. The two largest hospitals plan to merge. Compute the pre-merger and post
-merger HHI for this market. Based on the hospital merger guidelines, would this merger likely be
challenged by the antitrust authorities?
U.S. antitrust laws are designed to prohibit monopolization and encourage competition. Why, then, does the government erect barriers to entry and create monopoly power by granting firms patents?
Is the following statement correct? "The antitrust laws in reality deal less with monopolies than with oligopolies."
Chapter 15 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS
Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 15 - Prob. 1QECh. 15 - Prob. 2QECh. 15 - Prob. 3QECh. 15 - Prob. 4QECh. 15 - Prob. 5QECh. 15 - Prob. 6QECh. 15 - Prob. 7QECh. 15 - Prob. 8QECh. 15 - Prob. 9QECh. 15 - Prob. 10QECh. 15 - Prob. 11QECh. 15 - Prob. 12QECh. 15 - Prob. 13QECh. 15 - Prob. 14QECh. 15 - Prob. 15QECh. 15 - Prob. 16QECh. 15 - Prob. 17QECh. 15 - Prob. 18QECh. 15 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 1IPCh. 15 - Prob. 2IPCh. 15 - Prob. 3IPCh. 15 - Prob. 4IPCh. 15 - Prob. 5IPCh. 15 - Prob. 6IPCh. 15 - Prob. 7IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Why do the United States and many other countries have antitrust laws? What’s so harmful about oligopoly that it warrants an entire body of law?arrow_forwardIn the article by Michael Baye and Joshua Wright (“Is Antitrust Too Complicated forGeneralist Judges?”), describe how they measure the economic complexity of antitrustcases. What as the modal level of complexity? How would you describe the complexitydistribution?arrow_forwardHow antitrust policy and industrial organization is related?arrow_forward
- According to the Federal Trade Commission, “Many mergers benefit competition and consumers by allowing firms to operate more efficiently. But some mergers change market dynamics in ways that can lead to higher prices, fewer or lower-quality goods or services, or less innovation.” Antitrust laws often allow the former pro-competitive types of mergers, but prohibit the latter anti-competitive types. Suppose that one looks over the historical record of antitrust enforcement and finds that while the authorities have permitted some mergers and blocked others, the industry’s average price has tended to fall whenever a merger has been permitted and occurred. a) Based solely on the information provided above, is it correct then to infer that the antitrust authorities should have been more lenient and permitted more mergers? Why or why not? b) Based solely on the information in the question, is it likely that these merged firms sell products that are substitutes or complements? Whyarrow_forwardFrom the perspective of consumers and society overall, monopolies are worse than perfectly competitive markets. This is the major reason behind the existence of US antitrust laws. Describe a situation, however, where monopolies are good for consumers and why. (Hints: Is perfect competition always the right comparison? What kinds of costs typically lead to industries where a monopoly may benefit consumers?)arrow_forwardDetermine whether each of the statements regarding the regulation of mergers in the United States is true or false by dragging the true and false labels into the correct bins The Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission are Answer Bank responsible for approving mergers and enforcing antitrust law false true Market definition is one of the main parts of current merger guidelines. The Federal Reserve oversees the enforcement of antitrust law Measure of concentration is one of the main parts of current merger guidelines. Mergers that result in a relatively high HHI are less likely to be approved than mergers resulting in a lower HHI. Firm diversification is one of the main parts of the current merger guidelinesarrow_forward
- Question C2 The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has opened an investigation regarding collusion between the two major firms producing fire protection gear for bush firefighters. The firms - Azure Associates and Blue Guard - contend that they are quantity competitors and that the prices they are charging are a result of an increase in price by their suppliers. As part of the case, the ACCC has noted that the Australian firefighters typically purchase their own protective gear and are thus price takers in the market. Both the ACCC and the two firms under investigation agree that the market demand can be described by the inverse demand function: P(Q)=240-Q, where Q is the total quantity provided by the two firms (i.e., Q=q₁ + 9B, where is the 9A amount produced by Azure Associates and q, is the amount produced by Blue Guard). All parties also agree that the two firms have identical production technologies and that the two firms have the same constant marginal cost of…arrow_forwardOur textbook discusses two methods of regulating natural monopolies. One of them is price cap regulation. One of the following answers is an example of price cap regulation. Which one? Group of answer choices A government setting the price that a cable company can charge over a period of time by looking at the cable company's accounting costs and then adding a normal rate of profit. A government setting a price level for a public utility several years in advance. When a regulated public utility plays a large role in setting up the regulations that they will follow. When a firm no longer is considered a natural monopoly because of decreased demand.arrow_forwardAnswer the given question with a proper explanation and step-by-step solution. Why is it important for the United States to have laws such as the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Clayton Antitrust Act? Can you describe corporations today that are taking such a large part of market share that it's difficult for smaller companies to enter the market?arrow_forward
- PRICE (Dollars per can) 2.00 1.80 1.60 Demand 1.40 1.20 1.00 0.80 0.60 0.40 0.20 0 0 MC = ATC MR 90 180 270 360 450 540 630 720 810 900 QUANTITY (Cans of beer) Monopoly Outcome $0.80 per can. Given this When they act as a profit-maximizing cartel, each company will produce 180 cans and charge information, each firm earns a daily profit of $144.00, so the daily total industry profit in the beer market is $288.00. Oligopolists often behave noncooperatively and act in their own self-interest even though this decreases total profit in the market. Again, assume the two companies form a cartel and decide to work together. Both firms initially agree to produce half the quantity that maximizes total industry profit. Now, suppose that Stargell decides to break the collusion and increase its output by 50%, while Schmidt continues to produce the amount set under the collusive agreement. Stargell's deviation from the collusive agreement causes the price of a can of beer to now $ , while Schmidt's…arrow_forwardAssume that a firm’s marginal cost of production is $20 and the price charged to consumers is $25. Antitrust agencies use this information to estimate the firm’s monopoly power. What is the value of the Lerner Index in this example?a. 0.80 b. 0.25 c. 0.20arrow_forwardAnswer this for me mate. Much appreciated.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student Edition
Economics
ISBN:9780078747663
Author:McGraw-Hill
Publisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning