MICROECONOMICS
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781266686764
Author: Colander
Publisher: MCG
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 15, Problem 2QAP
(a)
To determine
Explanation of the opinion about the statement.
(b)
To determine
Problem of the argument.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
What are the four most important ways a firm becomes a monopoly? Will a monopoly that maximizes profit also be maximizing revenue? Will it be maximizing output? Explain.
Assume the graph below represents the market for a monopolist. What quantity will the monopolist produce, and what price will she charge? What will her total revenue, costs, and profit be at this level of production? What will the deadweight loss for society be at this level of production? (Assume the MC curve is a straight line between the relevant points for this calculation.)
3. U.S. antitrust laws are designed to prohibit monopolization and encourage competition. Why, then, does the government erect barriers to entry and create monopoly power by granting firms patents?
What are the four most important ways a firm becomes a monopoly? Will a monopoly that maximizes profit also be maximizing revenue? Will it be maximizing output? Explain.
Assume the graph below represents the market for a monopolist. What quantity will the monopolist produce, and what price will she charge? What will her total revenue, costs, and profit be at this production level? What will the deadweight loss for society be at this level of production? (Assume the MC curve is a straight line between the relevant points for this calculation.)
Prior to 1995, Taiwan had only one beer producer, a government-owned monopoly called Taiwan Beer. Suppose that while it was a monopoly, the company was
run in a way to maximize profit for the government. That is, assume that it behaved like a private, profit-maximizing monopolist. Assuming demand and cost
conditions are given on the following diagram, at what level would Taiwan Beer have targeted output and what price would it have charged?
Now suppose that while it was a monopoly, Taiwan Beer decided to compete in the highly competitive American market. Assume further that Taiwan maintained
import barriers so that American producers could not sell in Taiwan but that they were not immediately reciprocated.
Assuming Taiwan Beer could sell all that it could produce in the American market at a price P = Pu.s., indicate the following:
Total output is given by
Initial output sold in Taiwan is given by
The new price in Taiwan after the U.S. market opens is
The output sold in the U.S. is…
Chapter 15 Solutions
MICROECONOMICS
Ch. 15.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 15.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 15 - Prob. 1QECh. 15 - Prob. 2QECh. 15 - Prob. 3QECh. 15 - Prob. 4QECh. 15 - Prob. 5QECh. 15 - Prob. 6QECh. 15 - Prob. 7QECh. 15 - Prob. 8QECh. 15 - Prob. 9QECh. 15 - Prob. 10QECh. 15 - Prob. 11QECh. 15 - Prob. 12QECh. 15 - Prob. 13QECh. 15 - Prob. 14QECh. 15 - Prob. 15QECh. 15 - Prob. 16QECh. 15 - Prob. 17QECh. 15 - Prob. 18QECh. 15 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 15 - Prob. 1IPCh. 15 - Prob. 2IPCh. 15 - Prob. 3IPCh. 15 - Prob. 4IPCh. 15 - Prob. 5IPCh. 15 - Prob. 6IPCh. 15 - Prob. 7IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- There are claims saying that free flow of trade prevents monopoly. However, free flow of trade may cause monopoly through predatory pricing. For instance, a foreign industry may dump its goods in a country with free flow of goods strategy. Thus, it forces other rivals out of the market, and will get a monopoly position. Please provide a counter-argument for the above claimarrow_forwardExplainarrow_forwardTo answer this question, you will want to work out the answer using a graph on a piece of scratch paper (not turned in). You are going to compare the outcomes in the case where there is perfect competition to the monopoly case. So, as an intermediate step, you will need to compute the equilibrium outcomes under competition and monopoly. Suppose that you have the following information about the demand for oil. Price ($/barrel) 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 Suppose that the marginal cost to produce a barrel of oil is $20. What is the deadweight loss if the oil market is a monopoly? Quantity demanded(# barrels) 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12arrow_forward
- The following graph shows the demand (D) for gas services in the imaginary town of Utilityburg. The graph also shows the marginal revenue (MR) curve, the marginal cost (MC) curve, and the average total cost (ATC) curve for the local gas company, natural monopolist. On the following graph, use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the profit-maximizing price and quantity for this natural monopolist. (? 20 18 Monopoly Outcome 16 14 12 10 ATC MC MR 1 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 QUANTITY (Hundreds of cubic feet) PRICE (Dollars per hundred cubic feet)arrow_forwardShow that if Pete increases production by 100 utensils he will earn more profit, assuming that Pat sticks with the quantity you found above, which is half of what would be produced if the industry were controlled by a monopoly. Next, calculate what profit each would make if Pat also cheats by producing 100 more utensils. Assuming that they both calculate that the other will "cheat" and produce at this higher amount, would either have an incentive to further overproduce? What would happen to either seller's profit by producing another 100 more units? If cheating beyond this point will drive down one's own profit, and thus is not in anyone's interest, could this point be called a "Nash" equilibrium?arrow_forwardMODEL SCENARIO-TOOTHPASTE Quantity of Toothpaste Produced Price of Toothpaste Sold DIncrease Olocrease ODecrease ODecrease OUnchanged DUnchanged DUnknown OUnknown 3. 4.arrow_forward
- The “Free the Beer” case is currently before the Supreme Court of Canada. In 2012 Gerard Comeau, 64, was fined $292.50 for bringing 14 cases of beer into New Brunswick from Quebec where the liquor taxes are cheaper. Every province in the country has signed on to the case to defend their monopoly right to sell and tax alcohol in their province. What is ironic about this given that Canada is also renegotiating NAFTA, entering into the Trans Pacific Partnership, and other international trade agreements? Why do you think the provinces have all signed up to defend these barriers?arrow_forwardThe graph shows the demand and cost conditions facing a perfectly competitive industry. If the industry is taken over by a monopoly, what is the deadweight loss that results from the behavior of the monopoly? The deadweight loss that results from the behavior of the monopoly is $ per year. >>> Remember that the quantity given on the x-axis is in thousands of pizzas. (...) 36- 32- 28- 24-23 20- 16- 12- 8- 4- 0- Price and cost (dollars per pizza) 0 12 8 15 MR 8 4 12 16 20 24 Quantity (thousands of pizzas per year) --+ 26 MC D L 28 Qarrow_forwardImagine a small town in a remote area where only two residents, Maria and Miguel, own dairies that produce milk that is safe to drink. Each week Maria and Miguel work together to decide how many gallons of milk to produce. They bring milk to town and sell it at whatever price the market will bear. To keep things simple, suppose that Maria and Miguel can produce as much milk as they want without cost so that the marginal cost is zero. The weekly town demand schedule and total revenue schedule for milk is shown in the table below: Quantity (in gallons) 10 |1 O b. $12 O c. $10 d. S8 2 113 14 לן 16 17 18 19 10 11 12 Price $24 $22 $20 $18 $16 $14 $12 $10 $8 $6 $4 $2 $0 Total Revenue (and Total Profit) $0 $22 $40 $54 $64 $70 $72 $70 $64 $54 $40 $22 $0 Refer to Table 17-3. Suppose the town enacts new antitrust laws that prohibit Maria and Miguel from operating as a monopoly. What will be the price of milk once Maria and Miguel reach a Nash equilibrium? a. $14arrow_forward
- Give a discussion from the economies of scale perspective on the statement “trade need not be the result of comparative advantage”. And derive the relationship between the number of firms (n) and the price each firm charges (P) for the model of monopolistic competition. [Hint: P = c + 1/ (b * n); c is the marginal cost; b is a positive constant term representing the responsiveness of a firm’s sales to its prices]arrow_forwardIn this question, you will discuss the general case of positive externalities in a monopolist’s presence. what is the impact of a monopolist’s presence on a market without positive externalities? Does monopolist hurt the overall social gain (i.e., total surplus or total welfare)? Please explain. Could a monopolist improve the competitive market outcome for a good or a service with positive externalities (and no government intervention to correct it)? Why or why not? Please explain.arrow_forwarda) True or False and Explain: A profit maximizing monopolist has no limit to how high they set the price. b) True of False and explain: When there are economies of scale in production it is possible for a competitive market to sustain the competitive equilibrium. c) When there are economies of scale in production, why is it beneficial to have only one producer?arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Microeconomics: Principles & PolicyEconomicsISBN:9781337794992Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. SolowPublisher:Cengage Learning
Microeconomics: Principles & Policy
Economics
ISBN:9781337794992
Author:William J. Baumol, Alan S. Blinder, John L. Solow
Publisher:Cengage Learning