Subpart (a):
Calculate total revenue and marginal revenue.
Subpart (a):
Explanation of Solution
Table – 1 shows the schedule of market demand for the CD.
Table – 1
Price | Quantity |
24 | 10,000 |
22 | 20,000 |
20 | 30,000 |
18 | 40,000 |
16 | 50,000 |
14 | 60,000 |
Total revenue is calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (1) to calculate the total revenue at quantity of 10,000 units.
Thus, total revenue is $240,000.
Marginal Revenue is calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (2) to calculate the marginal revenue at the output level of 20,000 units.
Thus, the marginal revenue is $20.
Table – 2 shows the calculation of Total Revenue and Marginal Revenue obtained by using Equations (1) and (2).
Table – 2
Price | Quantity | Total Revenue | Marginal Revenue |
24 | 10,000 | 240,000 | - |
22 | 20,000 | 440,000 | 20 |
20 | 30,000 | 600,000 | 16 |
18 | 40,000 | 720,000 | 12 |
16 | 50,000 | 800,000 | 8 |
14 | 60,000 | 840,000 | 4 |
Concept introduction:
Total revenue: Total revenue is derived by multiplying the price with total quantity sold.
Marginal revenue: Marginal revenue is the additional revenue generated due to sale of one unit of output.
Subpart (b):
Total cost and marginal cost.
Subpart (b):
Explanation of Solution
Total cost is calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (3) to calculate the total cost at 10,000 units of output. Since, the firm has only variable cost, the cost is $5.
Total cost is $50,000.
Thus, the total cost is $50,000.
Marginal Cost is calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (4) to calculate the marginal cost.
Thus, the marginal cost is $20.
Profit is calculated using the following formula:
Substitute the respective values in Equation (4) to calculate the profit at 10,000 units.
Thus, the profit is $190,000.
Table -3 shows the Total Cost and Profit obtained by using Equations (3) and (4).
Table -3
Price | Quantity | Total Revenue | Marginal Revenue | Total Cost | Marginal Cost | Profit |
24 | 10,000 | 240,000 | - | 50,000 | - | 190,000 |
22 | 20,000 | 440,000 | 20 | 100,000 | 5 | 340,000 |
20 | 30,000 | 600,000 | 16 | 150,000 | 5 | 450,000 |
18 | 40,000 | 720,000 | 12 | 200,000 | 5 | 520,000 |
16 | 50,000 | 800,000 | 8 | 250,000 | 5 | 550,000 |
14 | 60,000 | 840,000 | 4 | 300,000 | 5 | 540,000 |
A firm can achieve profit maximizing condition at the point where the marginal revenue equal to the marginal cost. Thus, from Table – 3, the quantity at which MC is closest to MR without exceeding it is 50,000 CDs at a price of $16, where the profit is $550,000.
Concept introduction:
Total cost: Total cost refers to the cost of all the inputs used by the firm. It includes both the fixed cost and the variable costs.
Marginal cost: Marginal cost is the additional cost incurred due to sale of one unit of output.
Subpart (c):
Recommended quantity.
Subpart (c):
Explanation of Solution
As Johnny's agent, the fee recommends that he demand $550,000 because all the profit generated by the firm will be received by the agents. The firm would not change the output to produce 50,000 CDs because the payment of agent’s fees does not change the marginal cost.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 15 Solutions
Bundle: Principles of Microeconomics, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + Principles of Macroeconomics, Loose-Leaf Version, 7th + MindTap Economics, 2 terms (12 ... for Mankiw’s Principles of Economics, 7th
- Don't used Ai solutionarrow_forward"Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forward
- Please answer step by steparrow_forwardSuppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forward
- O’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forwardThe cost of garbage pickup in Green Gulch is $4,500,000 for Year 1. The population is increasing at 6%, the nominal cost per ton is increasing at 5%, and the general inflation rate is estimated at 4%.(a) Estimate the cost in Year 4 in Year-1 dollars and in nominal dollars.(b) Reference a data source for trends in volume of garbage per person. How does including this change your answer? Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be $6.20M, $5.2M, thank you.arrow_forwardPlease show each step with formulas, don't use Excel. The answer should be 4 years, $16,861.arrow_forward
- Assume general inflation is 2.5% per year. What is the price tag in 8 years for an item that has an inflation rate of 4.5% that costs $700 today? Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be $1203, thank you.arrow_forwardThe average cost of a certain model car was $22,000 ten years ago. This year the average cost is $35,000.(a) Calculate the average monthly inflation rate (fm) for this model.(b) Given the monthly rate fm, what is the effective annual rate, f, of inflation for this model?(c) Estimate what these will sell for 10 years from now, expressed in today’s dollars. Please show all steps and formulas, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) 0.3877%, (b) 4.753%, (c) $55,682arrow_forwardA mining corporation purchased $120,000 of production machinery and depreciated it using 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 5-year MACRS depreciation, a 5-year depreciable life, and zero salvage value. The corporation is a profitable one that has a 22% combined incremental tax rate. At the end of 5 years the mining company changed its method of operation and sold the production machinery for $40,000. During the 5 years the machinery was used, it reduced mine operation costs by $32,000 a year before taxes. If the company MARR is 12% after taxes, was the investment in the machinery a satisfactory one? Please show every step with formulas and don't use excel. The answer should be 14.8%, thank you.arrow_forward
- Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage LearningEconomics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Exploring EconomicsEconomicsISBN:9781544336329Author:Robert L. SextonPublisher:SAGE Publications, Inc