ECON MACRO
ECON MACRO
5th Edition
ISBN: 9781337000529
Author: William A. McEachern
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 15, Problem 2.4P
To determine

To explain:

Using an AD-AS diagram, the short-run and long-run impacts of an increase in the money supply assuming that the economy is initially in long-run equilibrium:

Concept Introduction:

The Federal Reserve manages the supply of the money and money aggregates in the economy. They increase money supply to stimulate output and employment in the economy. However, an increase in money supply also affects the price level in the economy. The Fed does this through open market purchase of U.S. government securities or by printing money. This increase in money supply results with a decrease in the interest rates. However, such money supply has major effect on the real GDP, the potential output in the economy, and the price levels. One can understand this relationship better with the help of AD-AS (aggregate demand-aggregate supply) diagram given below.

Blurred answer
Students have asked these similar questions
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
answer
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
  • Text book image
    Economics:
    Economics
    ISBN:9781285859460
    Author:BOYES, William
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
    Text book image
    Economics (MindTap Course List)
    Economics
    ISBN:9781337617383
    Author:Roger A. Arnold
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
    Text book image
    Macroeconomics
    Economics
    ISBN:9781337617390
    Author:Roger A. Arnold
    Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics:
Economics
ISBN:9781285859460
Author:BOYES, William
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Economics (MindTap Course List)
Economics
ISBN:9781337617383
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Macroeconomics
Economics
ISBN:9781337617390
Author:Roger A. Arnold
Publisher:Cengage Learning