a)
To Explain: The effect of information-sharing objective, when all details of co-op advertising are agreed to up front in franchise market, supposing that there is an enhanced effectiveness of cooperative advertising that occurs under the circumstances that the distributor shares on-the spot information with its superior, about the current trends in market-place.
a)
Answer to Problem 1E
The distributor and the manufacturer are mutually benefited by sharing on-the spot information about the market conditions and sales.
Explanation of Solution
In order to reach their target markets, cooperative advertisement is a very cost-effective advertisement strategy, for the distributors, retailers or manufacturer, benefiting all. In this method, the manufacturer, along with its retailer or wholesale dealer, pool in a part of their financial resources for advertising the product, wherein the cost of the same is shared between the parties.
When there is an enhanced effectiveness of cooperative advertising occurs if the distributor shares on-the spot information to its superior about the current trends of market place with the manufacturer, wherein it has been agreed upon to up front all the details of cooperative advertising in the franchise document, then it will enable them to pursue maximizing of their benefits.
Introduction: The advertising strategy of retailers, in which specific mention about the manufacturer is also included, is called cooperative advertising. In this case, the cost of advertisement is either borne fully by manufacturer, or shares the cost of the advertisement with the retailer.
b)
To Explain: The effect of information-sharing objective, when advertising is independently pursued by the manufacturer and retail distributor, supposing that there is an enhanced effectiveness of cooperative advertising that occurs under the circumstances that the distributor shares on-the spot information with its superior, about the current trends in market-place.
b)
Answer to Problem 1E
When advertisements are done independently by the manufacturer and retailer, sharing of information by the retailer might be beneficial only for the manufacturer and not the retailer.
Explanation of Solution
In order to reach their target markets, cooperative advertisement is a very cost-effective advertisement strategy, for the distributors, retailers or manufacturer, benefiting all. In this method, the manufacturer, along with its retailer or wholesale dealer, pool in a part of their financial resources for advertising the product, wherein the cost of the same is shared between the parties.
When the advertisement is independently pursued by the manufacturer and distributor, then sharing of information will be beneficial only to either of the party, and there won’t be any mutual benefits. As information about market conditions play a key role in advertisement, it is better not to pass on such information to manufacturer by the retailer, as the retailer might not be benefited with this.
Introduction: The advertising strategy of retailers, in which specific mention about the manufacturer is also included, is called cooperative advertising. In this case, the cost of advertisement is either borne fully by manufacturer, or shares the cost of the advertisement with the retailer.
c)
To Explain: The effect of information-sharing objective, when there is cooperative advertising allowances rebated from the franchise fees of the distributor, supposing that there is an enhanced effectiveness of cooperative advertising that occurs under the circumstances that the distributor shares on-the spot information with its superior, about the current trends in market-place.
c)
Answer to Problem 1E
A rebate given by the manufacturer on the franchise fee of retailer can be considered as a way of sharing the costs of cooperative advertisement, and hence sharing of information about market conditions will help both the parties mutually.
Explanation of Solution
In order to reach their target markets, cooperative advertisement is a very cost-effective advertisement strategy, for the distributors, retailers or manufacturer, benefiting all. In this method, the manufacturer, along with its retailer or wholesale dealer, pool in a part of their financial resources for advertising the product, wherein the cost of the same is shared between the parties.
When a rebate is given on the franchise fees of the distributor, it becomes equivalent to sharing of cost of cooperative advertisement and hence sharing of on-the spot information about market conditions will mutually help both the retailer as well as the manufacturer.
Introduction: The advertising strategy of retailers, in which specific mention about the manufacturer is also included, is called cooperative advertising. In this case, the cost of advertisement is either borne fully by manufacturer, or shares the cost of the advertisement with the retailer.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 15 Solutions
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
- answerarrow_forwardDiscuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
- For the statement below, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statement. Incompetent leaders can't be ethical leaders. Traditional leadership theories and moral standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues.arrow_forwardpresentation on "Dandelion Insomnia." Poemarrow_forwardDon't used Ai solutionarrow_forward
- "Whether the regulator sells or gives away tradeable emission permits free of charge, the quantities of emissions produced by firms are the same." Assume that there are n identical profit-maximising firms where profit for each firm is given by π(e) with л'(e) > 0; π"(e) < 0 and e denotes emissions. Individual emissions summed over all firms gives E which generates environmental damages D(E). Show that the regulator achieves the optimal level of total pollution through a tradeable emission permit scheme, where the permits are distributed according to the following cases: Case (i) the firm purchases all permits; Case (ii) the firm receives all permits free; and Page 3 of 5 ES30031 Case (iii) the firm purchases a portion of its permits and receives the remainder free of charge.arrow_forwardcompare and/or contrast the two plays we've been reading, Antigone and A Doll's House.arrow_forwardPlease answer step by steparrow_forward
- Suppose there are two firms 1 and 2, whose abatement costs are given by c₁ (e₁) and C2 (е2), where e denotes emissions and subscripts denote the firm. We assume that c{(e) 0 for i = 1,2 and for any level of emission e we have c₁'(e) # c₂' (e). Furthermore, assume the two firms make different contributions towards pollution concentration in a nearby river captured by the transfer coefficients ε₁ and 2 such that for any level of emission e we have C₂'(e) # The regulator does not know the resulting C₁'(e) Τι environmental damages. Using an analytical approach explain carefully how the regulator may limit the concentration of pollution using (i) a Pigouvian tax scheme and (ii) uniform emissions standards. Discuss the cost-effectiveness of both approaches to control pollution.arrow_forwardBill’s father read that each year a car’s value declines by 10%. He also read that a new car’s value declines by 12% as it is driven off the dealer’s lot. Maintenance costs and the costs of “car problems” are only $200 per year during the 2-year warranty period. Then they jump to $750 per year, with an annual increase of $500 per year.Bill’s dad wants to keep his annual cost of car ownership low. The car he prefers cost $30,000 new, and he uses an interest rate of 8%. For this car, the new vehicle warranty is transferrable.(a) If he buys the car new, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(b) If he buys the car after it is 2 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(c) If he buys the car after it is 4 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(d) If he buys the car after it is 6 years old, what is the minimum cost life? What is the minimum EUAC?(e) What strategy do you recommend? Why? Please show each step and formula,…arrow_forwardO’Leary Engineering Corp. has been depreciating a $50,000 machine for the last 3 years. The asset was just sold for 60% of its first cost. What is the size of the recaptured depreciation or loss at disposal using the following depreciation methods?(a) Straight-line with N = 8 and S = 2000(b) Double declining balance with N = 8(c) 40% bonus depreciation with the balance using 7-year MACRS Please show every step and formula, don't use excel. The answer should be (a) $2000 loss, (b) $8000 deo recap, (c) $14257 dep recap, thank you.arrow_forward
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...EconomicsISBN:9781305506381Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. HarrisPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781337617383Author:Roger A. ArnoldPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics Today and Tomorrow, Student EditionEconomicsISBN:9780078747663Author:McGraw-HillPublisher:Glencoe/McGraw-Hill School Pub Co