Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
8th Edition
ISBN: 9781133956570
Author: Frederick J Gravetter, Larry B. Wallnau
Publisher: Cengage Learning
bartleby

Concept explainers

bartleby

Videos

Question
Book Icon
Chapter 15, Problem 15P

a.

To determine

To Find: If the proportion of participants who claim to remember broken glass differ significantly from group to group for the given question.

a.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 15P

Reject null hypothesis and conclude that proportion of participants who claim to remember broken glass differ significantly from group to group.

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

A sample of 150 students were involved in a study based on “the response they gave regarding the broken glass or verb used for speed”. The distribution is given in the question. Use α=0.05 to test the claim.

 YesNoTotal
Smashed into163450
Hit74350
Control (not asked)64450
Total29121150

Calculation:

Step 1: Null Hypothesis and Alternate Hypothesis are:

H0: Proportion of participants who claim to remember broken glass does not differ significantly from group to group.

H1: Proportion of participants who claim to remember broken glass differ significantly from group to group

Step 2: For the given sample, degrees of freedom equals:

df=(R1)(C1)   where R equals number of rows and C equals columns=(31)(21)=2

With α=0.05 and df=2, the critical value (CV)  is obtained from the χ2table as

χ2=5.991

Step 3: χ2statistic is calculated as:

χ2=(fofe)2fe

The formula to calculate expected frequency is:

fe=fcfrn...where fr is row frequency and fc is column frequency

Substitute n=600 in the above formula and compute respective values of expected frequencies:

For the category “smashed into”, the expected frequencies are:

fe,yes=29×50150fe,no=121×50150

For the category “Hit”, the expected frequencies are:

fe,yes=29×50150fe,no=121×50150

Similarly, for the category “control”, the expected frequencies are:

fe,yes=29×50150fe,no=121×50150

The contingency table is :

 YesNoTotal
Smashed into16 (9.66)34 (40.33)50
Hit7 (9.66)43 (40.33)50
Control (not asked)6 (9.66)44 (40.33)50
Total29121150

Here the values within the braces are the expected frequencies.

Finally substitute the values in the χ2-statistics formula as:

χ2=(169.66)29.66+(79.66)29.66+(69.66)29.66+(3440.33)240.33+(4340.33)240.33+(4440.33)240.33=40.199.66+7.079.66+13.399.66+40.0640.33+7.1240.33+13.4640.33=6.27+1.50=7.77

Step 4: Rejection rule: Reject when χ2statistic>CV. Since χ2statistic(=7.77)>critical value(=5.991), reject the null hypothesis.

Step 5: Based on the results of hypothesis test, there is sufficient evidence to reject the null hypothesis at α=0.05.

Hence, reject null hypothesis and conclude that proportion of participants who claim to remember broken glass differ significantly from group to group.

b.

To determine

To Find: The value of Cramer’s V for the given question.

b.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 15P

The value of Cramer’s V is 0.227.

Explanation of Solution

Calculations:

The formula for Cramer’s V is:

Cramers V=χ2(df)n

Here,

df=min(R1,C1)i.e. minimum of either rows or columnsNumber of columns (=2)<Number of rows (=3)df=1

Substitute 7.77 for χ2, 150 for n and 1 for df,

Cramers V=7.771×150=0.227

Hence, the value of Cramer’s V is 0.227.

c.

To determine

To Describe: How does the phrasing of the question influenced the participants memories.

c.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 15P

The phrasing of question influenced the participants memories little bit.

Explanation of Solution

Cramer’s V is used as post-test to determine strengths of association once the chi-square has determined significance.

A value of 0.227 indicates a small effect. That is, a little association between the groups.

d.

To determine

How would the outcome of hypothesis and Cramer’s V will be written in the report.

d.

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 15P

Report will be χ2(2,n=150)=7.77,p<0.05,V=0.227 .

Explanation of Solution

The result showed that the proportion of participants who claim to remember broken glass differ significantly from group to group.

χ2(2,n=150)=7.77,p<0.05,V=0.227

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
Problem 3. Pricing a multi-stock option the Margrabe formula The purpose of this problem is to price a swap option in a 2-stock model, similarly as what we did in the example in the lectures. We consider a two-dimensional Brownian motion given by W₁ = (W(¹), W(2)) on a probability space (Q, F,P). Two stock prices are modeled by the following equations: dX = dY₁ = X₁ (rdt+ rdt+0₁dW!) (²)), Y₁ (rdt+dW+0zdW!"), with Xo xo and Yo =yo. This corresponds to the multi-stock model studied in class, but with notation (X+, Y₁) instead of (S(1), S(2)). Given the model above, the measure P is already the risk-neutral measure (Both stocks have rate of return r). We write σ = 0₁+0%. We consider a swap option, which gives you the right, at time T, to exchange one share of X for one share of Y. That is, the option has payoff F=(Yr-XT). (a) We first assume that r = 0 (for questions (a)-(f)). Write an explicit expression for the process Xt. Reminder before proceeding to question (b): Girsanov's theorem…
Problem 1. Multi-stock model We consider a 2-stock model similar to the one studied in class. Namely, we consider = S(1) S(2) = S(¹) exp (σ1B(1) + (M1 - 0/1 ) S(²) exp (02B(2) + (H₂- M2 where (B(¹) ) +20 and (B(2) ) +≥o are two Brownian motions, with t≥0 Cov (B(¹), B(2)) = p min{t, s}. " The purpose of this problem is to prove that there indeed exists a 2-dimensional Brownian motion (W+)+20 (W(1), W(2))+20 such that = S(1) S(2) = = S(¹) exp (011W(¹) + (μ₁ - 01/1) t) 롱) S(²) exp (021W (1) + 022W(2) + (112 - 03/01/12) t). where σ11, 21, 22 are constants to be determined (as functions of σ1, σ2, p). Hint: The constants will follow the formulas developed in the lectures. (a) To show existence of (Ŵ+), first write the expression for both W. (¹) and W (2) functions of (B(1), B(²)). as (b) Using the formulas obtained in (a), show that the process (WA) is actually a 2- dimensional standard Brownian motion (i.e. show that each component is normal, with mean 0, variance t, and that their…
The scores of 8 students on the midterm exam and final exam were as follows.   Student Midterm Final Anderson 98 89 Bailey 88 74 Cruz 87 97 DeSana 85 79 Erickson 85 94 Francis 83 71 Gray 74 98 Harris 70 91   Find the value of the (Spearman's) rank correlation coefficient test statistic that would be used to test the claim of no correlation between midterm score and final exam score. Round your answer to 3 places after the decimal point, if necessary. Test statistic: rs =

Chapter 15 Solutions

Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences

Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Statistics
Learn more about
Need a deep-dive on the concept behind this application? Look no further. Learn more about this topic, statistics and related others by exploring similar questions and additional content below.
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...
Algebra
ISBN:9781680331141
Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURT
Publisher:Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Text book image
Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...
Algebra
ISBN:9780079039897
Author:Carter
Publisher:McGraw Hill
Text book image
Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll...
Algebra
ISBN:9781337111348
Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan Noell
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Finding The Focus and Directrix of a Parabola - Conic Sections; Author: The Organic Chemistry Tutor;https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYgmOTLbuqE;License: Standard YouTube License, CC-BY