
Interpretation: The equilibrium constant for a reaction is given. The possibility of the reaction to be in the equilibrium or the direction in which the reaction proceeds to reach the equilibrium is to be stated.
Concept introduction: If the reaction quotient is equal to the equilibrium constant, then the reaction is in equilibrium.
If the reaction quotient is less than the equilibrium constant, then the reaction proceeds in forward direction to achieve the equilibrium.
If the reaction quotient is more than the equilibrium constant, then the reaction proceeds in backward direction to achieve the equilibrium.
To determine: The possibility of the given reaction to be in the equilibrium or the direction in which the reaction proceeds to reach the equilibrium.

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 14 Solutions
Smartwork5 Printed Access Card for Use with Chemistry: The Science in Context 5th Edition (SmartWork Access Printed Access Card)
- Elimination-Addition: What molecule was determined to be an intermediate based on a “trapping experiment”? *please solve and see imagearrow_forwardShow the correct sequence to connect the reagent to product. * see imagearrow_forwardPredict the final product. If 2 products are made, list which should be “major” and “minor”. **see attachedarrow_forward
- The initial rates method can be used to determine the rate law for a reaction. using the data for the reaction below, what is the rate law for reaction? A+B-C - ALA] At (mot Trial [A] (mol) (MD 2 1 0.075 [B]( 0.075 mo LS 01350 2 0.075 0.090 0.1944 3 0.090 0.075 0.1350 Report value of k with two significant Figurearrow_forwardCompare trials 1 and 2 where [B] is constant. The rate law can be written as: rate = k[A][B]". rate2 0.090 = 9. rate1 0.010 [A]m 6.0m = 3m [A] m 2.0marrow_forwardCan you please explain this problem to me and expand it so I can understand the full Lewis dot structure? Thanks!arrow_forward
- Can you please explain this problem to me and expand it so I can understand the full Lewis dot structure? Thanks!arrow_forwardCan you please explain this problem to me and expand it so I can understand the full Lewis dot structure? Thanks!arrow_forwardPlease answer the questions in the photos and please revise any wrong answers. Thank youarrow_forward
- ChemistryChemistryISBN:9781305957404Author:Steven S. Zumdahl, Susan A. Zumdahl, Donald J. DeCostePublisher:Cengage LearningChemistryChemistryISBN:9781259911156Author:Raymond Chang Dr., Jason Overby ProfessorPublisher:McGraw-Hill EducationPrinciples of Instrumental AnalysisChemistryISBN:9781305577213Author:Douglas A. Skoog, F. James Holler, Stanley R. CrouchPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Organic ChemistryChemistryISBN:9780078021558Author:Janice Gorzynski Smith Dr.Publisher:McGraw-Hill EducationChemistry: Principles and ReactionsChemistryISBN:9781305079373Author:William L. Masterton, Cecile N. HurleyPublisher:Cengage LearningElementary Principles of Chemical Processes, Bind...ChemistryISBN:9781118431221Author:Richard M. Felder, Ronald W. Rousseau, Lisa G. BullardPublisher:WILEY





