
The way by which the tax structure affects the decision of a person to immigrate into the nation or emigrate out of the nation. And the reasoning applied, if ocean or rivers separates the two countries.
Introduction:
Marginal income tax rate: It is defined as the amount of tax which is paid on every external dollar of income. When the income rises, the marginal tax rate of a person also rises. This means that the person with low income are taxed low and those with high income are taxed high.
Federal income tax rate: It is a type of progressive tax which is imposed by the federal government, states, and the local body in the United States. This means that as the income increases, the tax rate also increases.
Explanation:
Country A:
Given,
The yearly income is $40,000.
Tax rate is 20%.
The formula to calculate tax bill is,
Substitute 20% for tax rate and $40,000 for yearly income.
Tax bill of person earning $100,000 is,
The formula to calculate tax bill is,
Substitute 20% for tax rate and $100,000 for yearly income.
Country B:
Given,
The yearly income is $40,000.
Tax rate is 10%.
The formula to calculate tax bill is,
Substitute 10% for tax rate and $40,000 for yearly income.
Tax bill of person earning $40,000 at 10% tax rate and $60,000 at 40% tax rate is,
The formula to calculate tax bill is,
Substitute 10% for tax rate 1, 40% for tax rate 2.
- Thus, the tax bill in country A with $40,000 or less income is more than the tax bill in country B with same income. The tax bill in country A with $100,000 or more income is less in country A as compared to B with the same income.
- If the language, culture and climates of the country are same and if an individual can choose to live on one side or the other side of a river separating the two countries, then the person with a yearly income of more than $40,000 will choose to live in country A because the taxes charged there are less as compared to country B.
- On the other hand, one with less than $40,000 income will choose to live in country B as compared to country A.
- If instead of river,even an ocean would have divided the two countries, then the result would remain the same. The person with yearly income of more than $40,000 will choose to live in country A because the taxes charged are less as compared to country B. On the other hand, one with less than $40,000 income will choose to live in country B as compared to country A.
- Migrating to another country incurs time, cost like transportation, and finding a home to live. These costs are fixed and once the person gets settled, there would be no additional cost.
- If the language, culture, and the climates of the countries are different, then there is no chance of migration. It is very difficult to settle in a place that has different culture, language, and climate because along with migration cost there is an external social cost. Hence, an individual would not migrate, as the social cost is more important than monetary cost.

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 14 Solutions
Pearson eText for Economics of Public Issues -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
- A decrease in money demand causes the real interest rate to _____ and output to _____ in the short run, before prices adjust to restore equilibrium. Group of answer choices rise; rise fall; fall fall; rise rise; fallarrow_forwardIf a country's policy makers were to continously use expansionary monetary policy in an attempt to hold unemployment below the natural rate , the long urn result would be? Group of answer choices a decrease in the unemployment rate an increase in the level of output All of these an increase in the rate of inflationarrow_forwardA shift in the Aggregate Supply curve to the right will result in a move to a point that is southwest of where the economy is currently at. Group of answer choices True Falsearrow_forward
- An oil shock can cause stagflation, a period of higher inflation and higher unemployment. When this happens, the economy moves to a point to the northeast of where it currently is. After the economy has moved to the northeast, the Federal Reserve can reduce that inflation without having to worry about causing more unemployment. Group of answer choices True Falsearrow_forwardThe long-run Phillips Curve is vertical which indicates Group of answer choices that in the long-run, there is no tradeoff between inflation and unemployment. that in the long-run, there is no tradeoff between inflation and the price level. None of these that in the long-run, the economy returns to a 4 percent level of inflation.arrow_forwardSuppose the exchange rate between the British pound and the U.S. dollar is £1 = $2.00. The U.S. government implementsU.S. government implements a contractionary fiscal policya contractionary fiscal policy. Illustrate the impact of this change in the market for pounds. 1.) Using the line drawing tool, draw and label a new demand line. 2.) Using the line drawing tool, draw and label a new supply line. Note: Carefully follow the instructions above and only draw the required objects.arrow_forward
- Just Part D please, this is for environmental economicsarrow_forward3. Consider a single firm that manufactures chemicals and generates pollution through its emissions E. Researchers have estimated the MDF and MAC curves for the emissions to be the following: MDF = 4E and MAC = 125 – E Policymakers have decided to implement an emissions tax to control pollution. They are aware that a constant per-unit tax of $100 is an efficient policy. Yet they are also aware that this policy is not politically feasible because of the large tax burden it places on the firm. As a result, policymakers propose a two- part tax: a per unit tax of $75 for the first 15 units of emissions an increase in the per unit tax to $100 for all further units of emissions With an emissions tax, what is the general condition that determines how much pollution the regulated party will emit? What is the efficient level of emissions given the above MDF and MAC curves? What are the firm's total tax payments under the constant $100 per-unit tax? What is the firm's total cost of compliance…arrow_forward2. Answer the following questions as they relate to a fishery: Why is the maximum sustainable yield not necessarily the optimal sustainable yield? Does the same intuition apply to Nathaniel's decision of when to cut his trees? What condition will hold at the equilibrium level of fishing in an open-access fishery? Use a graph to explain your answer, and show the level of fishing effort. Would this same condition hold if there was only one boat in the fishery? If not, what condition will hold, and why is it different? Use the same graph to show the single boat's level of effort. Suppose you are given authority to solve the open-access problem in the fishery. What is the key problem that you must address with your policy?arrow_forward
- 1. Repeated rounds of negotiation exacerbate the incentive to free-ride that exists for nations considering the ratification of international environmental agreements.arrow_forwardFor environmental Economics, A-C Pleasearrow_forwardTrue/ False/ Undetermined - Environmental Economics 3. When the MAC is known but there is uncertainty about the MDF, an emissions quota leads to a lower deadweight loss associated with this uncertainty.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





