
The net monetary gain in each scenario and the way in which the incentive to work differs from scenario to scenario.
Concept introduction:
Unemployment benefits refer to the amount of money that a government provides to the young people who are actively searching for job but are unable to find one. It is a form of allowance to the unemployed youth.
Net Monetary Gain:
Net monetary gain is defined as the money that is left after the deduction of unemployment benefits and income tax.The formula to calculate net monetary gain is,
Explanation:
Net monetary gain in scenario 1:
Given,
Payment from the neighbor is $500.
Unemployment benefit is $200.
The formula to calculate net monetary gain is,
Substitute $500 for payment from neighbor and $200 for unemployment benefit.
Therefore, the net monetary gain is $300.
Net monetary gain in scenario 2:
Given,
Payment from the neighbor is $500.
Unemployment benefit is $100.
Income tax is $100
The formula to calculate net monetary gain is,
Substitute $500 for payment from neighbor, $100 for unemployment benefit and $100 for income tax.
Therefore, the net monetary gain is $300.
Net monetary gain in scenario 3:
Given,
Payment from the neighbor is $500.
Unemployment benefit is $0.
Income tax is $100
The formula to calculate net monetary gain is,
Substitute $500 for payment from neighbor, $0 for unemployment benefit and $100 for income tax.
Therefore, the net monetary gain is $400.
- Scenario 3 has the largest incentive, as the person is working more. In this case, there is no income tax, and the unemployment benefit is also less i.e. $100.
- Scenario 1 has the least incentive because the unemployment benefit is $200. As the unemployment benefit increases, the incentive to work decreases.
- Scenario 2 is a situation between scenario 1 and scenario 3. This is because it has both income tax and unemployment benefit i.e. $100.

Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 14 Solutions
Pearson eText for Economics of Public Issues -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
- A decrease in money demand causes the real interest rate to _____ and output to _____ in the short run, before prices adjust to restore equilibrium. Group of answer choices rise; rise fall; fall fall; rise rise; fallarrow_forwardIf a country's policy makers were to continously use expansionary monetary policy in an attempt to hold unemployment below the natural rate , the long urn result would be? Group of answer choices a decrease in the unemployment rate an increase in the level of output All of these an increase in the rate of inflationarrow_forwardA shift in the Aggregate Supply curve to the right will result in a move to a point that is southwest of where the economy is currently at. Group of answer choices True Falsearrow_forward
- An oil shock can cause stagflation, a period of higher inflation and higher unemployment. When this happens, the economy moves to a point to the northeast of where it currently is. After the economy has moved to the northeast, the Federal Reserve can reduce that inflation without having to worry about causing more unemployment. Group of answer choices True Falsearrow_forwardThe long-run Phillips Curve is vertical which indicates Group of answer choices that in the long-run, there is no tradeoff between inflation and unemployment. that in the long-run, there is no tradeoff between inflation and the price level. None of these that in the long-run, the economy returns to a 4 percent level of inflation.arrow_forwardSuppose the exchange rate between the British pound and the U.S. dollar is £1 = $2.00. The U.S. government implementsU.S. government implements a contractionary fiscal policya contractionary fiscal policy. Illustrate the impact of this change in the market for pounds. 1.) Using the line drawing tool, draw and label a new demand line. 2.) Using the line drawing tool, draw and label a new supply line. Note: Carefully follow the instructions above and only draw the required objects.arrow_forward
- Just Part D please, this is for environmental economicsarrow_forward3. Consider a single firm that manufactures chemicals and generates pollution through its emissions E. Researchers have estimated the MDF and MAC curves for the emissions to be the following: MDF = 4E and MAC = 125 – E Policymakers have decided to implement an emissions tax to control pollution. They are aware that a constant per-unit tax of $100 is an efficient policy. Yet they are also aware that this policy is not politically feasible because of the large tax burden it places on the firm. As a result, policymakers propose a two- part tax: a per unit tax of $75 for the first 15 units of emissions an increase in the per unit tax to $100 for all further units of emissions With an emissions tax, what is the general condition that determines how much pollution the regulated party will emit? What is the efficient level of emissions given the above MDF and MAC curves? What are the firm's total tax payments under the constant $100 per-unit tax? What is the firm's total cost of compliance…arrow_forward2. Answer the following questions as they relate to a fishery: Why is the maximum sustainable yield not necessarily the optimal sustainable yield? Does the same intuition apply to Nathaniel's decision of when to cut his trees? What condition will hold at the equilibrium level of fishing in an open-access fishery? Use a graph to explain your answer, and show the level of fishing effort. Would this same condition hold if there was only one boat in the fishery? If not, what condition will hold, and why is it different? Use the same graph to show the single boat's level of effort. Suppose you are given authority to solve the open-access problem in the fishery. What is the key problem that you must address with your policy?arrow_forward
- 1. Repeated rounds of negotiation exacerbate the incentive to free-ride that exists for nations considering the ratification of international environmental agreements.arrow_forwardFor environmental Economics, A-C Pleasearrow_forwardTrue/ False/ Undetermined - Environmental Economics 3. When the MAC is known but there is uncertainty about the MDF, an emissions quota leads to a lower deadweight loss associated with this uncertainty.arrow_forward
- Principles of Economics (12th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134078779Author:Karl E. Case, Ray C. Fair, Sharon E. OsterPublisher:PEARSONEngineering Economy (17th Edition)EconomicsISBN:9780134870069Author:William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, C. Patrick KoellingPublisher:PEARSON
- Principles of Economics (MindTap Course List)EconomicsISBN:9781305585126Author:N. Gregory MankiwPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage LearningManagerial Economics & Business Strategy (Mcgraw-...EconomicsISBN:9781259290619Author:Michael Baye, Jeff PrincePublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





