Case summary: Company NEPG contracted with company SS to supply stylets and nozzles to company KY. However, the contract did not make any reference to KY or required its acknowledgement. NEPG further contracted with company SS for acquiring parts from company IS. The terms of the contract stated that before shipment, company IS will obtain company NEPG’s acceptance on conforming goods. NEPG will certify the shipment according to KY’s specification. And on delivery, KY will inspect the goods. After nearly six transactions, NEPG refused to make payments as the material supplied by SS was rejected by KY.
To find: The impact of the UCC acceptance rules on the action of the parties.
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Chapter 14 Solutions
The Legal Environment of Business: Text and Cases (MindTap Course List)
- What is the profit margin if the tax rate is 32 percent?arrow_forwardNova Flex Corp. had net fixed assets of $20,500 at the start of the year and $21,800 at the end. The company recorded $4,200 in depreciation and spent $9,000 on purchasing new fixed assets. How much in fixed assets did Nova Flex Corp. sell during the year?arrow_forwardPlease given correct answer for General accounting question I need step by step explanationarrow_forward
BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Essentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage Learning
Accounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education