Today’s Cigarettes
Vapor or electronic cigarettes have increased dramatically over the past five years. Compared to traditional tobacco products a lot of research has not been performed on alternative smoking devices even though the sales of these devices have double and then tripled. One study conducted at Virginia Commonwealth University considered the following factors: carbon monoxide concentration, heart rate, subjective effects of the user, and plasma nicotine concentration. The study consisted of 32 subjects. The subjects came from four separate groups, traditional cigarettes, 18-mg nicotine cartridge vapor brand, 16-mg nicotine cartridge vapor brand, and a device containing no vapors.
After five minutes of smoking, the smokers of the traditional cigarettes saw increased levels of carbon monoxide, heart rate, and plasma nicotine. The electronic vapor cigarette smokers did not see a significant increase in heart rate or subjective effects to the user. Answer the following questions.
1. What type of study was this (observational, quasi-experimental, or experimental)?
2. What are the independent and dependent variables?
3. Which was the treatment group?
4. Could the subjects’ blood pressures be affected by knowing that they are part of a study?
5. List some possible confounding variables.
6. Do you think this is a good way to study the effect of smokeless tobacco?
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 1 Solutions
Elementary Statistics: A Step By Step Approach
Additional Math Textbook Solutions
Statistics for Business and Economics (13th Edition)
Fundamentals of Statistics (5th Edition)
Essentials of Statistics, Books a la Carte Edition (5th Edition)
Elementary Statistics: A Step By Step Approach
Applied Statistics in Business and Economics
Essentials of Statistics (6th Edition)
- What is an experiment?arrow_forwardUrban Travel Times Population of cities and driving times are related, as shown in the accompanying table, which shows the 1960 population N, in thousands, for several cities, together with the average time T, in minutes, sent by residents driving to work. City Population N Driving time T Los Angeles 6489 16.8 Pittsburgh 1804 12.6 Washington 1808 14.3 Hutchinson 38 6.1 Nashville 347 10.8 Tallahassee 48 7.3 An analysis of these data, along with data from 17 other cities in the United States and Canada, led to a power model of average driving time as a function of population. a Construct a power model of driving time in minutes as a function of population measured in thousands b Is average driving time in Pittsburgh more or less than would be expected from its population? c If you wish to move to a smaller city to reduce your average driving time to work by 25, how much smaller should the city be?arrow_forward
- Functions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll...AlgebraISBN:9781337111348Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan NoellPublisher:Cengage LearningLinear Algebra: A Modern IntroductionAlgebraISBN:9781285463247Author:David PoolePublisher:Cengage LearningGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill
- Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin HarcourtHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGAL