Show that the set of palindromes over {0, 1} is not regular using the pumping lemma given in Exercise 22. [Hint: Consider strings of form 0N10N]
*22. One important technique used to prove that certain sets not regular is the pumping lemma. The pumping lemma states that if
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
![Blurred answer](/static/blurred-answer.jpg)
Chapter 13 Solutions
DISCRETE MATH CONNECT ACCESS
- 9. The concentration function of a random variable X is defined as Qx(h) = sup P(x ≤ X ≤x+h), h>0. x (a) Show that Qx+b (h) = Qx(h). (b) Is it true that Qx(ah) =aQx(h)? (c) Show that, if X and Y are independent random variables, then Qx+y (h) min{Qx(h). Qy (h)). To put the concept in perspective, if X1, X2, X, are independent, identically distributed random variables, and S₁ = Z=1Xk, then there exists an absolute constant, A, such that A Qs, (h) ≤ √n Some references: [79, 80, 162, 222], and [204], Sect. 1.5.arrow_forward29 Suppose that a mound-shaped data set has a must mean of 10 and standard deviation of 2. a. About what percentage of the data should lie between 6 and 12? b. About what percentage of the data should lie between 4 and 6? c. About what percentage of the data should lie below 4? 91002 175/1 3arrow_forward2,3, ample and rical t? the 28 Suppose that a mound-shaped data set has a mean of 10 and standard deviation of 2. a. About what percentage of the data should lie between 8 and 12? b. About what percentage of the data should lie above 10? c. About what percentage of the data should lie above 12?arrow_forward
- 27 Suppose that you have a data set of 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 5, and you assume that this sample represents a population. The mean is 3 and g the standard deviation is 1.225.10 a. Explain why you can apply the empirical rule to this data set. b. Where would "most of the values" in the population fall, based on this data set?arrow_forward30 Explain how you can use the empirical rule to find out whether a data set is mound- shaped, using only the values of the data themselves (no histogram available).arrow_forward5. Let X be a positive random variable with finite variance, and let A = (0, 1). Prove that P(X AEX) 2 (1-A)² (EX)² EX2arrow_forward
- 6. Let, for p = (0, 1), and xe R. X be a random variable defined as follows: P(X=-x) = P(X = x)=p. P(X=0)= 1-2p. Show that there is equality in Chebyshev's inequality for X. This means that Chebyshev's inequality, in spite of being rather crude, cannot be improved without additional assumptions.arrow_forward4. Prove that, for any random variable X, the minimum of EIX-al is attained for a = med (X).arrow_forward8. Recall, from Sect. 2.16.4, the likelihood ratio statistic, Ln, which was defined as a product of independent, identically distributed random variables with mean 1 (under the so-called null hypothesis), and the, sometimes more convenient, log-likelihood, log L, which was a sum of independent, identically distributed random variables, which, however, do not have mean log 1 = 0. (a) Verify that the last claim is correct, by proving the more general statement, namely that, if Y is a non-negative random variable with finite mean, then E(log Y) log(EY). (b) Prove that, in fact, there is strict inequality: E(log Y) < log(EY), unless Y is degenerate. (c) Review the proof of Jensen's inequality, Theorem 5.1. Generalize with a glimpse on (b).arrow_forward
- 2. Derive the component transformation equations for tensors shown be- low where [C] = [BA] is the direction cosine matrix from frame A to B. B[T] = [C]^[T][C]T 3. The transport theorem for vectors shows that the time derivative can be constructed from two parts: the first is an explicit frame-dependent change of the vector whereas the second is an active rotational change of the vector. The same holds true for tensors. Starting from the previous result, derive a version of transport theorem for tensors. [C] (^[T])[C] = dt d B dt B [T] + [WB/A]B[T] – TWB/A] (10 pt) (7pt)arrow_forwardUse the graph of the function y = f (x) to find the value, if possible. f(x) 8 7 6 Q5 y 3 2 1 x -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8+ Olim f(z) x-1+ O Limit does not exist.arrow_forward3. Prove that, for any random variable X, the minimum of E(X - a)² is attained for a = EX. Provedarrow_forward
- Linear Algebra: A Modern IntroductionAlgebraISBN:9781285463247Author:David PoolePublisher:Cengage LearningElements Of Modern AlgebraAlgebraISBN:9781285463230Author:Gilbert, Linda, JimmiePublisher:Cengage Learning,Elementary Linear Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305658004Author:Ron LarsonPublisher:Cengage Learning
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285463247/9781285463247_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781285463230/9781285463230_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305658004/9781305658004_smallCoverImage.gif)