Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden damage to the material. As part of a study of vibration phenomena, the paper “Shock Vibration Test of Concrete” ( ACI Materials J ., 2002: 361–370) reported the accompanying data on peak particle velocity (mm/sec) and ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity after impact to that before impact in concrete prisms. Transverse cracks appeared in the last 12 prisms, whereas there was no observed cracking in the first 18 prisms. a. Construct a comparative boxplot of ppv for the cracked and uncracked prisms and comment. Then estimate the difference between true average ppv for cracked and uncracked prisms in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability. b. The investigators fit the simple linear regression model to the entire data set consisting of 30 observations, with ppv as the independent variable and ratio as the dependent variable. Use a statistical software package to fit several different regression models, and draw appropriate inferences.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 13, Problem 65SE

Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden damage to the material. As part of a study of vibration phenomena, the paper “Shock Vibration Test of Concrete” (ACI Materials J., 2002: 361–370) reported the accompanying data on peak particle velocity (mm/sec) and ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity after impact to that before impact in concrete prisms.

Chapter 13, Problem 65SE, Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden

Transverse cracks appeared in the last 12 prisms, whereas there was no observed cracking in the first 18 prisms.

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of ppv for the cracked and uncracked prisms and comment. Then estimate the difference between true average ppv for cracked and uncracked prisms in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

b. The investigators fit the simple linear regression model to the entire data set consisting of 30 observations, with ppv as the independent variable and ratio as the dependent variable. Use a statistical software package to fit several different regression models, and draw appropriate inferences.

a.

Expert Solution

To determine

Construct a comparative boxplot for the given data.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The comparative boxplot is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 1

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The data shows the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio before and after impact in concrete prisms for peak velocity. The first 18 observations shows the values before cracking and last 12 observations shows the values after cracking.

Calculation:

Comparative boxplot:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct the boxplot is given below:

Choose Graph > Boxplot.
Under Multiple Y's, choose Simple. Click OK.
In Graph variables, enter the data of cracked and not cracked.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, the box plot is constructed for the cracked ratio and not cracked ratio and the box plot suggests that the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio for cracked ppv is greater than the ratio of not cracked ppv.

b.

Expert Solution

To determine

Fit several different regression models and draw conclusions.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The simple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 2

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 3

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model with interaction is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 4

Figure 3

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Simple linear regression:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a simple regression is fitted for the given data, the value of coefficient of determination is 57.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity can explain 57.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with indicator variable (crack):

The new indicator variable is created by coding the observations with crack as 1 and observations without a crack as 0. Then the multiple regression model is built.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 58.2 which tells that the peak particle velocity and crack can explain 58.2% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with interaction between ppv and indicator variable (crack):

The indication variable is created by multiplying the ppv with indicator variable.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack and interaction.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model with interaction between crack and ppv is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 60.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity, crack and interaction can explain 60.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

The P- value for the individual t statistic corresponding to ppv and interaction are 0.355 and 0.206 which greater than the 5% level of significance.

Conclusion:

The simple linear, multiple linear model and multiple linear model with interaction gives almost the same R2 value. Hence, models like quadratic or polynomial regression model could be considered.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

The article "Modeling Resilient Modulus and Temperature Correction for Saudi Roads" (H. Wahhab, I. Asi, and R. Ramadhan, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 2001:298– 305) describes a study designed to predict the resilient modulus of pavement from physical properties. The following table presents data for the resilient modulus at 40°Cin10® kPa (y), the surface area of the aggregate in m²/kg (x1), and the softening point of the asphalt in °C (х). y X1 X2 1.48 5.77 60.5 1.70 7.45 74.2 2.03 8.14 67.6 2.86 8.73 70.0 2.43 7.12 64.6 3.06 6.89 65.3 2.44 8.64 66.2 1.29 6.58 64.1 3.53 9.10 68.6 1.04 8.06 58.8 1.88 5.93 63.2 1.90 8.17 62.1 1.76 9.84 68.9 2.82 7.17 72.2 1.00 7.78 54.1 The full quadratic model is y = + P,x, + PzX, + Pz*jXz + Pxx¡ + Bzx; + €. Which submodel of this full model do you believe is most appropriate? Justify your answer by fitting two or more models and comparing the results.

The article "Influence of Freezing Temperature on Hydraulic Conductivity of Silty Clay" (J. Konrad and M. Samson, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2000:180–187) describes a study of factors affecting hydraulic conductivity of soils. The measurements of hydraulic conductivity in units of 108 cm/s (y), initial void ratio (x), and thawed void ratio (x2) for 12 specimens of silty clay are presented in the following table. y 1.01 1.12 1.04 1.30 1.01 1.04 0.955 1.15 1.23 1.28 1.23 1.30 0.84 0.88 0.85 0.95 0.88 0.86 0.85 0.89 0.90 0.94 0.88 0.90 X1 0.81 0.85 0.87 0.92 0.84 0.85 0.85 0.86 0.85 0.92 0.88 0.92 X2 Fit the model y = Bo + fix1 + e. For each coefficient, test the null hypothesis that it is equal to 0. Fit the model y = Bo + Bzx2 + e. For each coefficient, test the null hypothesis that it is equal to 0. Fit the model y = Bo + BzX1 + Bzxz + e. For each coefficient, test the null hypothesis that it is equal to 0. d. Which of the models in parts (a) to (c) is…

CONSTRUCT MODIFIED BOXPLOT To understand better the effects of exercise and aging on various cireulatory functions, the article "Cardiac Output in Male Middle-Aged Runners" (Journal of Sports Medicine [1982]: 17–22) presented data from a study of 21 middle-aged male runners. The following data set gives values of oxygen capacity values (in milliliters per kilo- gram per minute) while the participants pedaled at a speci- fied rate on a bicycle ergometer: 12.81 14.95 15.83 15.97 17.90 18.27 18.34 19.82 19.94 20.62 20.88 20.93 20.98 20.99 21.15 22.16 22.24 23.16 23.56 35.78 36.73 a. Compute the median and the quartiles for this data set. b. What is the value of the interquartile range? Are there outliers in this data set? c. Draw a modified boxplot, and comment on the interest- ing features of the plot.

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 13, Problem 65SE

Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden damage to the material. As part of a study of vibration phenomena, the paper “Shock Vibration Test of Concrete” (ACI Materials J., 2002: 361–370) reported the accompanying data on peak particle velocity (mm/sec) and ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity after impact to that before impact in concrete prisms.

Chapter 13, Problem 65SE, Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden

Transverse cracks appeared in the last 12 prisms, whereas there was no observed cracking in the first 18 prisms.

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of ppv for the cracked and uncracked prisms and comment. Then estimate the difference between true average ppv for cracked and uncracked prisms in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

b. The investigators fit the simple linear regression model to the entire data set consisting of 30 observations, with ppv as the independent variable and ratio as the dependent variable. Use a statistical software package to fit several different regression models, and draw appropriate inferences.

a.

Expert Solution

To determine

Construct a comparative boxplot for the given data.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The comparative boxplot is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 1

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The data shows the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio before and after impact in concrete prisms for peak velocity. The first 18 observations shows the values before cracking and last 12 observations shows the values after cracking.

Calculation:

Comparative boxplot:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct the boxplot is given below:

Choose Graph > Boxplot.
Under Multiple Y's, choose Simple. Click OK.
In Graph variables, enter the data of cracked and not cracked.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, the box plot is constructed for the cracked ratio and not cracked ratio and the box plot suggests that the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio for cracked ppv is greater than the ratio of not cracked ppv.

b.

Expert Solution

To determine

Fit several different regression models and draw conclusions.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The simple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 2

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 3

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model with interaction is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 4

Figure 3

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Simple linear regression:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a simple regression is fitted for the given data, the value of coefficient of determination is 57.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity can explain 57.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with indicator variable (crack):

The new indicator variable is created by coding the observations with crack as 1 and observations without a crack as 0. Then the multiple regression model is built.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 58.2 which tells that the peak particle velocity and crack can explain 58.2% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with interaction between ppv and indicator variable (crack):

The indication variable is created by multiplying the ppv with indicator variable.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack and interaction.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model with interaction between crack and ppv is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 60.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity, crack and interaction can explain 60.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

The P- value for the individual t statistic corresponding to ppv and interaction are 0.355 and 0.206 which greater than the 5% level of significance.

Conclusion:

The simple linear, multiple linear model and multiple linear model with interaction gives almost the same R2 value. Hence, models like quadratic or polynomial regression model could be considered.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 13, Problem 65SE

Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden damage to the material. As part of a study of vibration phenomena, the paper “Shock Vibration Test of Concrete” (ACI Materials J., 2002: 361–370) reported the accompanying data on peak particle velocity (mm/sec) and ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity after impact to that before impact in concrete prisms.

Chapter 13, Problem 65SE, Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden

Transverse cracks appeared in the last 12 prisms, whereas there was no observed cracking in the first 18 prisms.

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of ppv for the cracked and uncracked prisms and comment. Then estimate the difference between true average ppv for cracked and uncracked prisms in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

b. The investigators fit the simple linear regression model to the entire data set consisting of 30 observations, with ppv as the independent variable and ratio as the dependent variable. Use a statistical software package to fit several different regression models, and draw appropriate inferences.

a.

Expert Solution

To determine

Construct a comparative boxplot for the given data.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The comparative boxplot is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 1

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The data shows the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio before and after impact in concrete prisms for peak velocity. The first 18 observations shows the values before cracking and last 12 observations shows the values after cracking.

Calculation:

Comparative boxplot:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct the boxplot is given below:

Choose Graph > Boxplot.
Under Multiple Y's, choose Simple. Click OK.
In Graph variables, enter the data of cracked and not cracked.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, the box plot is constructed for the cracked ratio and not cracked ratio and the box plot suggests that the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio for cracked ppv is greater than the ratio of not cracked ppv.

b.

Expert Solution

To determine

Fit several different regression models and draw conclusions.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The simple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 2

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 3

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model with interaction is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 4

Figure 3

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Simple linear regression:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a simple regression is fitted for the given data, the value of coefficient of determination is 57.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity can explain 57.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with indicator variable (crack):

The new indicator variable is created by coding the observations with crack as 1 and observations without a crack as 0. Then the multiple regression model is built.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 58.2 which tells that the peak particle velocity and crack can explain 58.2% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with interaction between ppv and indicator variable (crack):

The indication variable is created by multiplying the ppv with indicator variable.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack and interaction.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model with interaction between crack and ppv is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 60.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity, crack and interaction can explain 60.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

The P- value for the individual t statistic corresponding to ppv and interaction are 0.355 and 0.206 which greater than the 5% level of significance.

Conclusion:

The simple linear, multiple linear model and multiple linear model with interaction gives almost the same R2 value. Hence, models like quadratic or polynomial regression model could be considered.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 13, Problem 65SE

Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden damage to the material. As part of a study of vibration phenomena, the paper “Shock Vibration Test of Concrete” (ACI Materials J., 2002: 361–370) reported the accompanying data on peak particle velocity (mm/sec) and ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity after impact to that before impact in concrete prisms.

Chapter 13, Problem 65SE, Curing concrete is known to be vulnerable to shock vibrations, which may cause cracking or hidden

Transverse cracks appeared in the last 12 prisms, whereas there was no observed cracking in the first 18 prisms.

a. Construct a comparative boxplot of ppv for the cracked and uncracked prisms and comment. Then estimate the difference between true average ppv for cracked and uncracked prisms in a way that conveys information about precision and reliability.

b. The investigators fit the simple linear regression model to the entire data set consisting of 30 observations, with ppv as the independent variable and ratio as the dependent variable. Use a statistical software package to fit several different regression models, and draw appropriate inferences.

a.

Expert Solution

To determine

Construct a comparative boxplot for the given data.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The comparative boxplot is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 1

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The data shows the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio before and after impact in concrete prisms for peak velocity. The first 18 observations shows the values before cracking and last 12 observations shows the values after cracking.

Calculation:

Comparative boxplot:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct the boxplot is given below:

Choose Graph > Boxplot.
Under Multiple Y's, choose Simple. Click OK.
In Graph variables, enter the data of cracked and not cracked.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, the box plot is constructed for the cracked ratio and not cracked ratio and the box plot suggests that the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio for cracked ppv is greater than the ratio of not cracked ppv.

b.

Expert Solution

To determine

Fit several different regression models and draw conclusions.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The simple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 2

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 3

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model with interaction is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 4

Figure 3

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Simple linear regression:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a simple regression is fitted for the given data, the value of coefficient of determination is 57.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity can explain 57.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with indicator variable (crack):

The new indicator variable is created by coding the observations with crack as 1 and observations without a crack as 0. Then the multiple regression model is built.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 58.2 which tells that the peak particle velocity and crack can explain 58.2% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with interaction between ppv and indicator variable (crack):

The indication variable is created by multiplying the ppv with indicator variable.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack and interaction.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model with interaction between crack and ppv is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 60.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity, crack and interaction can explain 60.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

The P- value for the individual t statistic corresponding to ppv and interaction are 0.355 and 0.206 which greater than the 5% level of significance.

Conclusion:

The simple linear, multiple linear model and multiple linear model with interaction gives almost the same R2 value. Hence, models like quadratic or polynomial regression model could be considered.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

a.

Expert Solution

To determine

Construct a comparative boxplot for the given data.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The comparative boxplot is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 1

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The data shows the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio before and after impact in concrete prisms for peak velocity. The first 18 observations shows the values before cracking and last 12 observations shows the values after cracking.

Calculation:

Comparative boxplot:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct the boxplot is given below:

Choose Graph > Boxplot.
Under Multiple Y's, choose Simple. Click OK.
In Graph variables, enter the data of cracked and not cracked.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, the box plot is constructed for the cracked ratio and not cracked ratio and the box plot suggests that the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio for cracked ppv is greater than the ratio of not cracked ppv.

b.

Expert Solution

To determine

Fit several different regression models and draw conclusions.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The simple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 2

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 3

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model with interaction is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 4

Figure 3

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Simple linear regression:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a simple regression is fitted for the given data, the value of coefficient of determination is 57.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity can explain 57.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with indicator variable (crack):

The new indicator variable is created by coding the observations with crack as 1 and observations without a crack as 0. Then the multiple regression model is built.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 58.2 which tells that the peak particle velocity and crack can explain 58.2% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with interaction between ppv and indicator variable (crack):

The indication variable is created by multiplying the ppv with indicator variable.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack and interaction.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model with interaction between crack and ppv is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 60.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity, crack and interaction can explain 60.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

The P- value for the individual t statistic corresponding to ppv and interaction are 0.355 and 0.206 which greater than the 5% level of significance.

Conclusion:

The simple linear, multiple linear model and multiple linear model with interaction gives almost the same R2 value. Hence, models like quadratic or polynomial regression model could be considered.

Answer 8

a.

Expert Solution

To determine

Construct a comparative boxplot for the given data.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The comparative boxplot is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 1

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The data shows the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio before and after impact in concrete prisms for peak velocity. The first 18 observations shows the values before cracking and last 12 observations shows the values after cracking.

Calculation:

Comparative boxplot:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct the boxplot is given below:

Choose Graph > Boxplot.
Under Multiple Y's, choose Simple. Click OK.
In Graph variables, enter the data of cracked and not cracked.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, the box plot is constructed for the cracked ratio and not cracked ratio and the box plot suggests that the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio for cracked ppv is greater than the ratio of not cracked ppv.

Answer 9

a.

Expert Solution

Answer 10

a.

Expert Solution

Answer 11

Expert Solution

Answer 12

To determine

Construct a comparative boxplot for the given data.

Answer 13

Answer to Problem 65SE

The comparative boxplot is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 1

Answer 14

Explanation of Solution

Given info:

The data shows the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio before and after impact in concrete prisms for peak velocity. The first 18 observations shows the values before cracking and last 12 observations shows the values after cracking.

Calculation:

Comparative boxplot:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to construct the boxplot is given below:

Choose Graph > Boxplot.
Under Multiple Y's, choose Simple. Click OK.
In Graph variables, enter the data of cracked and not cracked.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, the box plot is constructed for the cracked ratio and not cracked ratio and the box plot suggests that the ultra sonic pulse velocity ratio for cracked ppv is greater than the ratio of not cracked ppv.

Answer 15

b.

Expert Solution

To determine

Fit several different regression models and draw conclusions.

Answer to Problem 65SE

The simple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 2

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 3

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model with interaction is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 4

Figure 3

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Simple linear regression:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a simple regression is fitted for the given data, the value of coefficient of determination is 57.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity can explain 57.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with indicator variable (crack):

The new indicator variable is created by coding the observations with crack as 1 and observations without a crack as 0. Then the multiple regression model is built.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 58.2 which tells that the peak particle velocity and crack can explain 58.2% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with interaction between ppv and indicator variable (crack):

The indication variable is created by multiplying the ppv with indicator variable.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack and interaction.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model with interaction between crack and ppv is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 60.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity, crack and interaction can explain 60.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

The P- value for the individual t statistic corresponding to ppv and interaction are 0.355 and 0.206 which greater than the 5% level of significance.

Conclusion:

The simple linear, multiple linear model and multiple linear model with interaction gives almost the same R2 value. Hence, models like quadratic or polynomial regression model could be considered.

Answer 16

b.

Expert Solution

Answer 17

b.

Expert Solution

Answer 18

Expert Solution

Answer 19

To determine

Fit several different regression models and draw conclusions.

Answer 20

Answer to Problem 65SE

The simple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 2

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 3

Figure 2

The multiple linear regression model with interaction is given below:

Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, Chapter 13, Problem 65SE , additional homework tip 4

Figure 3

Answer 21

Explanation of Solution

Calculation:

Simple linear regression:

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a simple regression is fitted for the given data, the value of coefficient of determination is 57.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity can explain 57.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with indicator variable (crack):

The new indicator variable is created by coding the observations with crack as 1 and observations without a crack as 0. Then the multiple regression model is built.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 58.2 which tells that the peak particle velocity and crack can explain 58.2% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

Multiple regression model with interaction between ppv and indicator variable (crack):

The indication variable is created by multiplying the ppv with indicator variable.

Software procedure:

Step by step procedure to fit a simple linear regression model is given below:

Click Stat>Regression>Regression.
Under Response (Y) select the column containing ratio.
Under Predictor (X) select the column containing ppv, crack and interaction.
Click OK.

Interpretation:

Thus, a multiple regression model with interaction between crack and ppv is fitted for the given data , the value of coefficient of determination is 60.7 which tells that the peak particle velocity, crack and interaction can explain 60.7% of the variation in ratio of ultrasonic pulse velocity.

The P- value for the individual t statistic corresponding to ppv and interaction are 0.355 and 0.206 which greater than the 5% level of significance.

Conclusion:

The simple linear, multiple linear model and multiple linear model with interaction gives almost the same R2 value. Hence, models like quadratic or polynomial regression model could be considered.

Answer 22

Ch. 13.1 - Suppose the variables x = commuting distance and y...Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 2E Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 3E Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 4E Ch. 13.1 - As the air temperature drops, river water becomes...Ch. 13.1 - The accompanying scatterplot is based on data...Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 7E Ch. 13.1 - Prob. 8E Ch. 13.1 - Consider the following four (x, y) data sets; the...Ch. 13.1 - a. Show that i=1nei=0 when the eis are the...

Videos

Answer to Problem 65SE

Explanation of Solution

Answer to Problem 65SE

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 13 Solutions