Principles of Microeconomics California Edition 2nd Edition
2nd Edition
ISBN: 9780393622089
Author: Dirk Mateer, Lee Coppock
Publisher: W. W. Norton
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 13, Problem 4SP
To determine
The question answering and the dominant strategy.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Students have asked these similar questions
You have just played rock, paper, scissors with your friend. You chose scissors and he chose paper, so you won. Is this a Nash equilibrium? Explain why or why not.
Game theory problem
In game theory, what does the term "payoff" refer to?
a) The amount of money each player has at the beginning of the game.
b) The final outcome of the game.
c) The utility or benefit that a player receives based on the outcome of the game.
d) The number of strategies available to each player.
Chapter 13 Solutions
Principles of Microeconomics California Edition 2nd Edition
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- Economics Game theory: Consider a collective action game with thirty individuals (N = 30). When the number of participants in the joint project is n, each individual, including shirkers, receives a benefit of B(n) = 18n and each participant incurs a cost of C(n) = 32 – 2n. Please answer the questions I am asking! 1. Find all of the Nash equilibria, both stable and unstable ones. 2. Find the socially optimal outcome. 3. Check if any of the Nash equilibria is socially optimal. Explain your answer.arrow_forwardA Nash Equilibrium is the equilibrium of a game in which; Both players get the largest payoff amount Both players get the best payoff independent of what the other players choices are Both player, with the knowledge of what the other players possible moves are, do not have incentive to deviate from their strategy There is incomplete information of the game and each player makes the move that is best for them and their payoff outcomearrow_forwardGame Theory and Strategic Choices - End of Chapter Problem Your instructor challenges you to solve this classic economics thought experiment called the stag hunt: Suppose you and a hunting partner are hunting for food to feed your families in a post-apocalyptic world with no stores, farms, or trade. You lay a trap for a deer that will provide a large number of calories for your two families to continue to survive. While waiting, you both spot a hare running through the trap. If you chase after the hare, you'll catch it but you will scare any wildlife in the area and you won't catch the deer you were waiting for. The hare only provides a small amount of calories for your own family and none for your partner's family. Use the payoff matrix to answer the question. You hunt the deer You hunt the hare Your friend hunts the deer Your payoff is 5 Your friend's payoff is 5 Your payoff is 2 Your friend's payoff is A Your friend hunts the hare Your payoff is A Your friend's payoff is 2 Your…arrow_forward
- You could choose any position A (the first mover) or B (the second mover) in the following three bargaining games. For each game (I, II, or III), explain which player (A or B) you would pick in order to maximize your expected payoff? 1. Game I (one stage): A will make the first move and offer her partner a portion of 6 dollars. If the offer is accepted, the bargain is complete and each player gets an amount determined by the offer. If the offer is declined, each player gets nothing. 2. Game II (two stages): A will make the first move and offer her partner a portion of 12 dollars. If the offer is accepted, the bargain is complete and each player gets an amount determined by the offer. If the offer is declined, the 12 shrinks to 5 and B then gets a turn to make an offer. Again, the bargain is complete if A accepts and the division is made according to the terms of the offer. If player A declines the offer, each player gets nothing. 3. Game III (three stages): A will make the first move…arrow_forwardIn 'the dictator' game, one player (the dictator) chooses how to divide a pot of $10 between herself and another player (the recipient). The recipient does not have an opportunity to reject the proposed distribution. As such, if the dictator only cares about how much money she makes, she should keep all $10 for herself and give the recipient nothing. However, when economists conduct experiments with the dictator game, they find that dictators often offer strictly positive amounts to the recipients. Are dictators behaving irrationally in these experiments? Whether you think they are or not, your response should try to provide an explanation for the behavior.arrow_forwardBurger King has introduced new strategy by reducing the price of its Whopper by 75 percent if customers also purchased french fries and a soft drink. Nevertheless, the sales dropped within two weeks. Based on your knowledge on game theory, what do you think had happened?arrow_forward
- Nash equilibrium refers to the optimal outcome of a game where there is no incentive for the players to deviate from their initial strategy. An individual (or player) can receive no incremental benefit from changing actions, assuming other players remain constant in their strategies. Given this premise, can there be a no Nash equilibrium?arrow_forwardCome up with a diagram (i.e. using a two-player decision matrix such as the Prisoner’s Dilemma) for an original game theory/prisoner's dilemma scenario (either in business, politics, or your own personal life), and explain what would be the most likely outcome of the scenario you have chosen.arrow_forwardConsider a game where player A moves first, choosing between Left and Right. Then, after observing player A’s choice, player B moves next choosing between Up and Down. Which of the following is true? This is a game where players A and B have the same number of strategies. Player A will get a higher payoff than player B as A moves first. This is game will only have one Nash equilibrium. This is a game of perfect information.arrow_forward
- Exercise 3.12. Three players, Avinash, Brian and John, play the following game. Two cards, one red and the other black, are shuffled well and put face down on the table. Brian picks the top card, looks at it without showing it to the other players GAME THEORY - Giacomo Bonanno 124 (Avinash and John) and puts it back face down. Then Brian whispers either "Black" or "Red" in Avinash's ear, making sure that John doesn't hear. Avinash then tells John either "Black" or "Red". Finally John announces either "Black" or "Red" and this exciting game ends. The payoffs are as follows: if John's final announcement matches the true color of the card Brian looked at, then Brian and Avinash give $2 each to John. In every other case John gives $2 each to Brian and Avinash. (a) Represent this situation as an extensive-form game. (b) Write the corresponding strategic form (or normal form) assuming that the players are selfish, greedy and risk neutral.arrow_forwardThree married couples in the state of Maryland—Bob and Carol, Ted and Alice, and Ross and Mike (remember, same-sex marriage is legal in the state of Maryland)—are thinking about renting a boat to go sailing on the Chesapeake Bay. The cost of a boat rental is $600. Each of the three couples puts some amount of money in an envelope. Thus, each player in this game is a couple. If the total amount collected is at least $600, then the boat is rented. If the amount collected is more than $600, then the money left over after renting the boat is spent on wine. If the total amount collected is less than $600, then they do not rent the boat, and the money is spent on a dinner. Assume the benefit to a couple from the boat trip is 400, the benefit from each dollar spent on wine is 50 cents, the benefit from each dollar spent on dinner is 40 cents, and the personal cost of the contribution to a couple equals the amount of contribution. For example, if the boat is rented, $50 of wine is purchased…arrow_forwardGame theory is a useful tool for analyzing Situations in which multiple parties make decisions that do not affect each other. Situations in which multiple parties make decisions with the potential to affect each other. Situations in which multiple parties make decisions. Situations in which one party makes a decision with the potential to affect other parties. Any situation in which a decision must be made.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving ApproachEconomicsISBN:9781337106665Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike ShorPublisher:Cengage Learning
Managerial Economics: A Problem Solving Approach
Economics
ISBN:9781337106665
Author:Luke M. Froeb, Brian T. McCann, Michael R. Ward, Mike Shor
Publisher:Cengage Learning