The Company I was formed in 1900 and it invented the first personal computer in 1981. The company was successful in reaching military and general people both in form of its computers. The company sold PC division to Company L in 2004. The company I faced declining revenue for 20 consecutive quarters. The CEP GR wants to make the company a cloud-based solutions business, but the competitive business has become a challenge. The company analyzed that they are not able to give good results by working remotely and they want to work together as a team. It is seen that 40% of the workforce of the company works remotely. However, the company gave an ultimatum to its employees that either they work in the office or they leave the job. The reason for this calling is collaborative efficiency as the company wants to work in small efficient groups. Critics also stated that the main problem is not working remotely but issues in team processes. They believe that there should be virtual norms for working daily meetings can also help. Experts also suggested that the idea of calling back the people working remotely can hit back the company adversely. This will cause many talented people to leave the job as they cannot relocate easily which will affect the quality of teams. To explain: The causes for the problems faced by the company.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 2FD

Summary Introduction

Case summary: The Company I was formed in 1900 and it invented the first personal computer in 1981. The company was successful in reaching military and general people both in form of its computers. The company sold PC division to Company L in 2004. The company I faced declining revenue for 20 consecutive quarters. The CEP GR wants to make the company a cloud-based solutions business, but the competitive business has become a challenge. The company analyzed that they are not able to give good results by working remotely and they want to work together as a team. It is seen that 40% of the workforce of the company works remotely. However, the company gave an ultimatum to its employees that either they work in the office or they leave the job. The reason for this calling is collaborative efficiency as the company wants to work in small efficient groups. Critics also stated that the main problem is not working remotely but issues in team processes. They believe that there should be virtual norms for working daily meetings can also help. Experts also suggested that the idea of calling back the people working remotely can hit back the company adversely. This will cause many talented people to leave the job as they cannot relocate easily which will affect the quality of teams.

To explain:The causes for the problems faced by the company.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

What is a good response to this post? A few years ago, I was working at a third-party delivery service provider for Amazon and I was tasked with streamlining our company’s employee onboarding process. My goal was to reduce the average onboarding time from 15 full work days to 7 full work days without increasing costs or diminishing training experience. The challenge was aligning our limited resources—a small team and existing tools—with this ambitious objective while meeting customer expectations for a smooth and informative experience. To begin, I assessed the overall environment, specifically the training experience our new employees had with onboarding and driver training within our industry. It became clear that many competitors were already shifting towards faster, more user-friendly onboarding processes. Internally, I mapped out our resources, identifying inefficiencies in our current workflows as the primary bottleneck. Armed with this analysis, I strategized a plan to automate…

What is a good response to this post? The organization I’ve chosen is Amazon, and the legal risks it faces as it expands into the Swedish e-commerce market. Sweden has a highly unionized workforce with robust labor protections. Amazon’s traditional labor practices have faced criticism and conflicts with Swedish norms, leading to disputes with labor unions. Amazon has been accused of interfering with workers’ right to unionize, including allegations of intimidation, retaliation, and surveillance (Albuquerque, 2024). Amazon upholds principles and has established “Amazon’s Global Human Rights Principles,” which outline its commitment to respecting the human rights of all workers and creating a safe, inclusive, and respectful workplace. However, shareholders believe that these principles can be achieved without unionization and claim that a significant portion of workers rejected union efforts. Amazon is an American business deeply rooted in American culture and might not be the best fit…

What is a good respponse to this statement? I have chosen Starbucks in Australia for this discussion. Looking into this company you find it almost everywhere in the world with almost ease except in Australia. This is due to the economic risk it is to expand there. Australia is known to love coffee and has overall grown to having a huge industry there so in the companies' thoughts it should do well. However, Starbucks tends to make sweeter drinks at a higher cost compared to the local cafes. Australians also tend to favor the small local cafes in support of small businesses. This caused Starbucks to close most of their locations due to them growing to quickly in the amount stores they had to their overall popularity.