Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 26P

a.

To determine

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

a.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Special order decisions: Special order decisions include circumstances in which the board must choose whether to acknowledge abnormal customer orders. These requests or orders normally necessitate special dispensation or include a demand for lesser price.

Decision making: It is a vital capacity in the management, since decision making is identified with issue, a compelling decision making accomplishes the preferred objectives or goals by taking care of such issues.

Sunk cost: A sunk cost, otherwise called a stranded cost, is a cost that has just happened and cannot be transformed or evaded. It is also called as a cost that has just been paid and cannot be discounted or lessened.

Opportunity cost: An opportunity cost is the financial idea of potential profits that an organization surrenders by making an elective move.

Determine the total avoidable costs:

The facility-sustaining costs and stock holding costs about 20% remain the equivalent irrespective of whether frames are obtained or produced. Because these costs do not contrast between the alternatives, they are not avoidable. The depreciation cost is a sunk cost that is not avoidable. Nonetheless, the annual lease option of $70,000 is an opportunity cost that can be avoided if they quit producing the frames.

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Opportunity Cost+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($40×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$70,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$800,000+$200,000+$70,000+$70,000+$232,000]=$1,972,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost is $2,122,000.

Determine the avoidable cost per unit:

Avoidable Cost per unit=[Total Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,972,00020,000]=$98.60

Therefore the avoidable cost per unit is $98.60.

Determine the increase in income:

Outsourcing will reduce the cost and increases the income.

Increase in Income=[Number of Units×(Avoidable Cost per unit−Purchase Price)]=[20,000×($98.60−$85)]=[20,000×$13.60]=$272,000

Therefore the increase in income is $272,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the avoidable cost of $98.60 is greater than the purchase cost of $85. Hence, Company CB should outsource the frames. Outsourcing would diminish cost and increments productivity by $272,000.

Therefore, Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

b.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

b.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs of old equipment:

Avoidable Costold Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Oppurtunitycost of lease equipment]=[($40×20,000)+$70,000]=$800,000 + $70,000= $870,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of old equipment is $870,000.

Determine the unit level labour costs:

Unit Level Labor Costs=[Actual Labor Cost×(1−Change in Labor Cost)]=[$40×(1−60%)]=$16

Determine the depreciation cost:

Depreciation Cost=[Cost of New Equipment−Salvage ValueNumber of Years]=[$910,000−$70,0004]=[$840,0004]=$210,000

Therefore the depreciation cost is $210,000.

Determine the total avoidable costs of new equipment:

Avoidable CostNew Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Depreciation Cost]=[($16×20,000)+$210,000]=$530,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of new equipment is $530,000.

Determine the cost per unit of old equipment:

Cost per unitOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$870,00020,000]=$43.50

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $43.50.

Determine the cost per unit of new equipment:

Cost per unitNew Equipment=[Avoidable CostNew EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$530,00020,000]=$26.50

Therefore the cost per unit of new equipment is $26.50.

Determine the avoidable costs of using the old equipment:

Avoidable CostOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld Equipment−Avoidable CostNew Equipment]=[$870,000−$530,000]=$340,000

Therefore the avoidable cost of using the old equipment is $340,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost of depreciation of the new equipment is certifiably not a sunk cost for this situation on the grounds that the new equipment has not been bought. The avoidable cost of utilizing the current equipment is $340,000 greater than that of utilizing the new equipment. Thus, replacing the current equipment with the new equipment will build the organization's income by $340,000.

Therefore Company CB should replace the current equipment.

c.

To determine

Whether Company CB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

c.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Depreciation Expense+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($16×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$210,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$320,000+$200,000+$70,000+$210,000+$232,000]=$1,632,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost between two alternatives is $1,632,000.

Determine the cost per unit between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Cost per unit=[Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,632,00020,000]=$81.60

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $81.60.

Determine the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives:

Difference=[Actual Cost−Cost per unit]=[$85−$81.60]=$3.40

Therefore the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives is $3.40.

Determine the increase in profitability:

Increase in Profitability=[Number of Units×Difference in Cost per unit]=[$3.40×20,000]=$68,000

Therefore the increase in profitability is $68,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost per unit is $81.60, the savings from replacing the old equipment is $3.40 per frame and the increase in profitability is $68,000. Hence the old equipment should be replaced.

Therefore Company CB should replace the old equipment.

d.

To determine

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

d.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimizes the risk of establishing supplier relationship is as follows:

Before focusing on the outsourcing decision, Company CB must think about the capacity of the provider or suppliers to deliver the frames as per the organization's quality principles. Likewise, Company CB must guarantee itself that the frames will be conveyed on a convenient premise. By outsourcing, Company CB is dropping the advantages of vertical integration.

The organization is reliant on the provider's enactment. The loss of control should be weighed in contradiction of the advantages of cost reduction. Company CB can shield itself from problematic providers by keeping up a rundown of licensed providers. Company CB should furnish these providers with hikes or incentives for providing exceptional services, for example, amount buys and quick invoice payment so as to increase favoured customer standing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 26P

a.

To determine

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

a.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Special order decisions: Special order decisions include circumstances in which the board must choose whether to acknowledge abnormal customer orders. These requests or orders normally necessitate special dispensation or include a demand for lesser price.

Decision making: It is a vital capacity in the management, since decision making is identified with issue, a compelling decision making accomplishes the preferred objectives or goals by taking care of such issues.

Sunk cost: A sunk cost, otherwise called a stranded cost, is a cost that has just happened and cannot be transformed or evaded. It is also called as a cost that has just been paid and cannot be discounted or lessened.

Opportunity cost: An opportunity cost is the financial idea of potential profits that an organization surrenders by making an elective move.

Determine the total avoidable costs:

The facility-sustaining costs and stock holding costs about 20% remain the equivalent irrespective of whether frames are obtained or produced. Because these costs do not contrast between the alternatives, they are not avoidable. The depreciation cost is a sunk cost that is not avoidable. Nonetheless, the annual lease option of $70,000 is an opportunity cost that can be avoided if they quit producing the frames.

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Opportunity Cost+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($40×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$70,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$800,000+$200,000+$70,000+$70,000+$232,000]=$1,972,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost is $2,122,000.

Determine the avoidable cost per unit:

Avoidable Cost per unit=[Total Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,972,00020,000]=$98.60

Therefore the avoidable cost per unit is $98.60.

Determine the increase in income:

Outsourcing will reduce the cost and increases the income.

Increase in Income=[Number of Units×(Avoidable Cost per unit−Purchase Price)]=[20,000×($98.60−$85)]=[20,000×$13.60]=$272,000

Therefore the increase in income is $272,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the avoidable cost of $98.60 is greater than the purchase cost of $85. Hence, Company CB should outsource the frames. Outsourcing would diminish cost and increments productivity by $272,000.

Therefore, Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

b.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

b.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs of old equipment:

Avoidable Costold Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Oppurtunitycost of lease equipment]=[($40×20,000)+$70,000]=$800,000 + $70,000= $870,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of old equipment is $870,000.

Determine the unit level labour costs:

Unit Level Labor Costs=[Actual Labor Cost×(1−Change in Labor Cost)]=[$40×(1−60%)]=$16

Determine the depreciation cost:

Depreciation Cost=[Cost of New Equipment−Salvage ValueNumber of Years]=[$910,000−$70,0004]=[$840,0004]=$210,000

Therefore the depreciation cost is $210,000.

Determine the total avoidable costs of new equipment:

Avoidable CostNew Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Depreciation Cost]=[($16×20,000)+$210,000]=$530,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of new equipment is $530,000.

Determine the cost per unit of old equipment:

Cost per unitOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$870,00020,000]=$43.50

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $43.50.

Determine the cost per unit of new equipment:

Cost per unitNew Equipment=[Avoidable CostNew EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$530,00020,000]=$26.50

Therefore the cost per unit of new equipment is $26.50.

Determine the avoidable costs of using the old equipment:

Avoidable CostOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld Equipment−Avoidable CostNew Equipment]=[$870,000−$530,000]=$340,000

Therefore the avoidable cost of using the old equipment is $340,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost of depreciation of the new equipment is certifiably not a sunk cost for this situation on the grounds that the new equipment has not been bought. The avoidable cost of utilizing the current equipment is $340,000 greater than that of utilizing the new equipment. Thus, replacing the current equipment with the new equipment will build the organization's income by $340,000.

Therefore Company CB should replace the current equipment.

c.

To determine

Whether Company CB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

c.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Depreciation Expense+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($16×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$210,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$320,000+$200,000+$70,000+$210,000+$232,000]=$1,632,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost between two alternatives is $1,632,000.

Determine the cost per unit between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Cost per unit=[Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,632,00020,000]=$81.60

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $81.60.

Determine the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives:

Difference=[Actual Cost−Cost per unit]=[$85−$81.60]=$3.40

Therefore the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives is $3.40.

Determine the increase in profitability:

Increase in Profitability=[Number of Units×Difference in Cost per unit]=[$3.40×20,000]=$68,000

Therefore the increase in profitability is $68,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost per unit is $81.60, the savings from replacing the old equipment is $3.40 per frame and the increase in profitability is $68,000. Hence the old equipment should be replaced.

Therefore Company CB should replace the old equipment.

d.

To determine

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

d.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimizes the risk of establishing supplier relationship is as follows:

Before focusing on the outsourcing decision, Company CB must think about the capacity of the provider or suppliers to deliver the frames as per the organization's quality principles. Likewise, Company CB must guarantee itself that the frames will be conveyed on a convenient premise. By outsourcing, Company CB is dropping the advantages of vertical integration.

The organization is reliant on the provider's enactment. The loss of control should be weighed in contradiction of the advantages of cost reduction. Company CB can shield itself from problematic providers by keeping up a rundown of licensed providers. Company CB should furnish these providers with hikes or incentives for providing exceptional services, for example, amount buys and quick invoice payment so as to increase favoured customer standing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 26P

a.

To determine

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

a.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Special order decisions: Special order decisions include circumstances in which the board must choose whether to acknowledge abnormal customer orders. These requests or orders normally necessitate special dispensation or include a demand for lesser price.

Decision making: It is a vital capacity in the management, since decision making is identified with issue, a compelling decision making accomplishes the preferred objectives or goals by taking care of such issues.

Sunk cost: A sunk cost, otherwise called a stranded cost, is a cost that has just happened and cannot be transformed or evaded. It is also called as a cost that has just been paid and cannot be discounted or lessened.

Opportunity cost: An opportunity cost is the financial idea of potential profits that an organization surrenders by making an elective move.

Determine the total avoidable costs:

The facility-sustaining costs and stock holding costs about 20% remain the equivalent irrespective of whether frames are obtained or produced. Because these costs do not contrast between the alternatives, they are not avoidable. The depreciation cost is a sunk cost that is not avoidable. Nonetheless, the annual lease option of $70,000 is an opportunity cost that can be avoided if they quit producing the frames.

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Opportunity Cost+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($40×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$70,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$800,000+$200,000+$70,000+$70,000+$232,000]=$1,972,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost is $2,122,000.

Determine the avoidable cost per unit:

Avoidable Cost per unit=[Total Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,972,00020,000]=$98.60

Therefore the avoidable cost per unit is $98.60.

Determine the increase in income:

Outsourcing will reduce the cost and increases the income.

Increase in Income=[Number of Units×(Avoidable Cost per unit−Purchase Price)]=[20,000×($98.60−$85)]=[20,000×$13.60]=$272,000

Therefore the increase in income is $272,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the avoidable cost of $98.60 is greater than the purchase cost of $85. Hence, Company CB should outsource the frames. Outsourcing would diminish cost and increments productivity by $272,000.

Therefore, Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

b.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

b.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs of old equipment:

Avoidable Costold Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Oppurtunitycost of lease equipment]=[($40×20,000)+$70,000]=$800,000 + $70,000= $870,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of old equipment is $870,000.

Determine the unit level labour costs:

Unit Level Labor Costs=[Actual Labor Cost×(1−Change in Labor Cost)]=[$40×(1−60%)]=$16

Determine the depreciation cost:

Depreciation Cost=[Cost of New Equipment−Salvage ValueNumber of Years]=[$910,000−$70,0004]=[$840,0004]=$210,000

Therefore the depreciation cost is $210,000.

Determine the total avoidable costs of new equipment:

Avoidable CostNew Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Depreciation Cost]=[($16×20,000)+$210,000]=$530,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of new equipment is $530,000.

Determine the cost per unit of old equipment:

Cost per unitOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$870,00020,000]=$43.50

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $43.50.

Determine the cost per unit of new equipment:

Cost per unitNew Equipment=[Avoidable CostNew EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$530,00020,000]=$26.50

Therefore the cost per unit of new equipment is $26.50.

Determine the avoidable costs of using the old equipment:

Avoidable CostOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld Equipment−Avoidable CostNew Equipment]=[$870,000−$530,000]=$340,000

Therefore the avoidable cost of using the old equipment is $340,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost of depreciation of the new equipment is certifiably not a sunk cost for this situation on the grounds that the new equipment has not been bought. The avoidable cost of utilizing the current equipment is $340,000 greater than that of utilizing the new equipment. Thus, replacing the current equipment with the new equipment will build the organization's income by $340,000.

Therefore Company CB should replace the current equipment.

c.

To determine

Whether Company CB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

c.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Depreciation Expense+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($16×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$210,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$320,000+$200,000+$70,000+$210,000+$232,000]=$1,632,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost between two alternatives is $1,632,000.

Determine the cost per unit between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Cost per unit=[Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,632,00020,000]=$81.60

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $81.60.

Determine the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives:

Difference=[Actual Cost−Cost per unit]=[$85−$81.60]=$3.40

Therefore the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives is $3.40.

Determine the increase in profitability:

Increase in Profitability=[Number of Units×Difference in Cost per unit]=[$3.40×20,000]=$68,000

Therefore the increase in profitability is $68,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost per unit is $81.60, the savings from replacing the old equipment is $3.40 per frame and the increase in profitability is $68,000. Hence the old equipment should be replaced.

Therefore Company CB should replace the old equipment.

d.

To determine

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

d.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimizes the risk of establishing supplier relationship is as follows:

Before focusing on the outsourcing decision, Company CB must think about the capacity of the provider or suppliers to deliver the frames as per the organization's quality principles. Likewise, Company CB must guarantee itself that the frames will be conveyed on a convenient premise. By outsourcing, Company CB is dropping the advantages of vertical integration.

The organization is reliant on the provider's enactment. The loss of control should be weighed in contradiction of the advantages of cost reduction. Company CB can shield itself from problematic providers by keeping up a rundown of licensed providers. Company CB should furnish these providers with hikes or incentives for providing exceptional services, for example, amount buys and quick invoice payment so as to increase favoured customer standing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 13, Problem 26P

a.

To determine

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

a.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Special order decisions: Special order decisions include circumstances in which the board must choose whether to acknowledge abnormal customer orders. These requests or orders normally necessitate special dispensation or include a demand for lesser price.

Decision making: It is a vital capacity in the management, since decision making is identified with issue, a compelling decision making accomplishes the preferred objectives or goals by taking care of such issues.

Sunk cost: A sunk cost, otherwise called a stranded cost, is a cost that has just happened and cannot be transformed or evaded. It is also called as a cost that has just been paid and cannot be discounted or lessened.

Opportunity cost: An opportunity cost is the financial idea of potential profits that an organization surrenders by making an elective move.

Determine the total avoidable costs:

The facility-sustaining costs and stock holding costs about 20% remain the equivalent irrespective of whether frames are obtained or produced. Because these costs do not contrast between the alternatives, they are not avoidable. The depreciation cost is a sunk cost that is not avoidable. Nonetheless, the annual lease option of $70,000 is an opportunity cost that can be avoided if they quit producing the frames.

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Opportunity Cost+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($40×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$70,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$800,000+$200,000+$70,000+$70,000+$232,000]=$1,972,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost is $2,122,000.

Determine the avoidable cost per unit:

Avoidable Cost per unit=[Total Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,972,00020,000]=$98.60

Therefore the avoidable cost per unit is $98.60.

Determine the increase in income:

Outsourcing will reduce the cost and increases the income.

Increase in Income=[Number of Units×(Avoidable Cost per unit−Purchase Price)]=[20,000×($98.60−$85)]=[20,000×$13.60]=$272,000

Therefore the increase in income is $272,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the avoidable cost of $98.60 is greater than the purchase cost of $85. Hence, Company CB should outsource the frames. Outsourcing would diminish cost and increments productivity by $272,000.

Therefore, Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

b.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

b.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs of old equipment:

Avoidable Costold Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Oppurtunitycost of lease equipment]=[($40×20,000)+$70,000]=$800,000 + $70,000= $870,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of old equipment is $870,000.

Determine the unit level labour costs:

Unit Level Labor Costs=[Actual Labor Cost×(1−Change in Labor Cost)]=[$40×(1−60%)]=$16

Determine the depreciation cost:

Depreciation Cost=[Cost of New Equipment−Salvage ValueNumber of Years]=[$910,000−$70,0004]=[$840,0004]=$210,000

Therefore the depreciation cost is $210,000.

Determine the total avoidable costs of new equipment:

Avoidable CostNew Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Depreciation Cost]=[($16×20,000)+$210,000]=$530,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of new equipment is $530,000.

Determine the cost per unit of old equipment:

Cost per unitOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$870,00020,000]=$43.50

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $43.50.

Determine the cost per unit of new equipment:

Cost per unitNew Equipment=[Avoidable CostNew EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$530,00020,000]=$26.50

Therefore the cost per unit of new equipment is $26.50.

Determine the avoidable costs of using the old equipment:

Avoidable CostOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld Equipment−Avoidable CostNew Equipment]=[$870,000−$530,000]=$340,000

Therefore the avoidable cost of using the old equipment is $340,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost of depreciation of the new equipment is certifiably not a sunk cost for this situation on the grounds that the new equipment has not been bought. The avoidable cost of utilizing the current equipment is $340,000 greater than that of utilizing the new equipment. Thus, replacing the current equipment with the new equipment will build the organization's income by $340,000.

Therefore Company CB should replace the current equipment.

c.

To determine

Whether Company CB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

c.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Depreciation Expense+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($16×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$210,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$320,000+$200,000+$70,000+$210,000+$232,000]=$1,632,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost between two alternatives is $1,632,000.

Determine the cost per unit between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Cost per unit=[Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,632,00020,000]=$81.60

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $81.60.

Determine the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives:

Difference=[Actual Cost−Cost per unit]=[$85−$81.60]=$3.40

Therefore the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives is $3.40.

Determine the increase in profitability:

Increase in Profitability=[Number of Units×Difference in Cost per unit]=[$3.40×20,000]=$68,000

Therefore the increase in profitability is $68,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost per unit is $81.60, the savings from replacing the old equipment is $3.40 per frame and the increase in profitability is $68,000. Hence the old equipment should be replaced.

Therefore Company CB should replace the old equipment.

d.

To determine

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

d.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimizes the risk of establishing supplier relationship is as follows:

Before focusing on the outsourcing decision, Company CB must think about the capacity of the provider or suppliers to deliver the frames as per the organization's quality principles. Likewise, Company CB must guarantee itself that the frames will be conveyed on a convenient premise. By outsourcing, Company CB is dropping the advantages of vertical integration.

The organization is reliant on the provider's enactment. The loss of control should be weighed in contradiction of the advantages of cost reduction. Company CB can shield itself from problematic providers by keeping up a rundown of licensed providers. Company CB should furnish these providers with hikes or incentives for providing exceptional services, for example, amount buys and quick invoice payment so as to increase favoured customer standing.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 13, Problem 26P

a.

To determine

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

a.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Special order decisions: Special order decisions include circumstances in which the board must choose whether to acknowledge abnormal customer orders. These requests or orders normally necessitate special dispensation or include a demand for lesser price.

Decision making: It is a vital capacity in the management, since decision making is identified with issue, a compelling decision making accomplishes the preferred objectives or goals by taking care of such issues.

Sunk cost: A sunk cost, otherwise called a stranded cost, is a cost that has just happened and cannot be transformed or evaded. It is also called as a cost that has just been paid and cannot be discounted or lessened.

Opportunity cost: An opportunity cost is the financial idea of potential profits that an organization surrenders by making an elective move.

Determine the total avoidable costs:

The facility-sustaining costs and stock holding costs about 20% remain the equivalent irrespective of whether frames are obtained or produced. Because these costs do not contrast between the alternatives, they are not avoidable. The depreciation cost is a sunk cost that is not avoidable. Nonetheless, the annual lease option of $70,000 is an opportunity cost that can be avoided if they quit producing the frames.

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Opportunity Cost+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($40×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$70,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$800,000+$200,000+$70,000+$70,000+$232,000]=$1,972,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost is $2,122,000.

Determine the avoidable cost per unit:

Avoidable Cost per unit=[Total Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,972,00020,000]=$98.60

Therefore the avoidable cost per unit is $98.60.

Determine the increase in income:

Outsourcing will reduce the cost and increases the income.

Increase in Income=[Number of Units×(Avoidable Cost per unit−Purchase Price)]=[20,000×($98.60−$85)]=[20,000×$13.60]=$272,000

Therefore the increase in income is $272,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the avoidable cost of $98.60 is greater than the purchase cost of $85. Hence, Company CB should outsource the frames. Outsourcing would diminish cost and increments productivity by $272,000.

Therefore, Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

b.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

b.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs of old equipment:

Avoidable Costold Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Oppurtunitycost of lease equipment]=[($40×20,000)+$70,000]=$800,000 + $70,000= $870,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of old equipment is $870,000.

Determine the unit level labour costs:

Unit Level Labor Costs=[Actual Labor Cost×(1−Change in Labor Cost)]=[$40×(1−60%)]=$16

Determine the depreciation cost:

Depreciation Cost=[Cost of New Equipment−Salvage ValueNumber of Years]=[$910,000−$70,0004]=[$840,0004]=$210,000

Therefore the depreciation cost is $210,000.

Determine the total avoidable costs of new equipment:

Avoidable CostNew Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Depreciation Cost]=[($16×20,000)+$210,000]=$530,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of new equipment is $530,000.

Determine the cost per unit of old equipment:

Cost per unitOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$870,00020,000]=$43.50

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $43.50.

Determine the cost per unit of new equipment:

Cost per unitNew Equipment=[Avoidable CostNew EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$530,00020,000]=$26.50

Therefore the cost per unit of new equipment is $26.50.

Determine the avoidable costs of using the old equipment:

Avoidable CostOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld Equipment−Avoidable CostNew Equipment]=[$870,000−$530,000]=$340,000

Therefore the avoidable cost of using the old equipment is $340,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost of depreciation of the new equipment is certifiably not a sunk cost for this situation on the grounds that the new equipment has not been bought. The avoidable cost of utilizing the current equipment is $340,000 greater than that of utilizing the new equipment. Thus, replacing the current equipment with the new equipment will build the organization's income by $340,000.

Therefore Company CB should replace the current equipment.

c.

To determine

Whether Company CB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

c.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Depreciation Expense+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($16×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$210,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$320,000+$200,000+$70,000+$210,000+$232,000]=$1,632,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost between two alternatives is $1,632,000.

Determine the cost per unit between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Cost per unit=[Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,632,00020,000]=$81.60

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $81.60.

Determine the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives:

Difference=[Actual Cost−Cost per unit]=[$85−$81.60]=$3.40

Therefore the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives is $3.40.

Determine the increase in profitability:

Increase in Profitability=[Number of Units×Difference in Cost per unit]=[$3.40×20,000]=$68,000

Therefore the increase in profitability is $68,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost per unit is $81.60, the savings from replacing the old equipment is $3.40 per frame and the increase in profitability is $68,000. Hence the old equipment should be replaced.

Therefore Company CB should replace the old equipment.

d.

To determine

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

d.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimizes the risk of establishing supplier relationship is as follows:

Before focusing on the outsourcing decision, Company CB must think about the capacity of the provider or suppliers to deliver the frames as per the organization's quality principles. Likewise, Company CB must guarantee itself that the frames will be conveyed on a convenient premise. By outsourcing, Company CB is dropping the advantages of vertical integration.

The organization is reliant on the provider's enactment. The loss of control should be weighed in contradiction of the advantages of cost reduction. Company CB can shield itself from problematic providers by keeping up a rundown of licensed providers. Company CB should furnish these providers with hikes or incentives for providing exceptional services, for example, amount buys and quick invoice payment so as to increase favoured customer standing.

Answer 6

Chapter 13, Problem 26P

a.

To determine

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

a.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Special order decisions: Special order decisions include circumstances in which the board must choose whether to acknowledge abnormal customer orders. These requests or orders normally necessitate special dispensation or include a demand for lesser price.

Decision making: It is a vital capacity in the management, since decision making is identified with issue, a compelling decision making accomplishes the preferred objectives or goals by taking care of such issues.

Sunk cost: A sunk cost, otherwise called a stranded cost, is a cost that has just happened and cannot be transformed or evaded. It is also called as a cost that has just been paid and cannot be discounted or lessened.

Opportunity cost: An opportunity cost is the financial idea of potential profits that an organization surrenders by making an elective move.

Determine the total avoidable costs:

The facility-sustaining costs and stock holding costs about 20% remain the equivalent irrespective of whether frames are obtained or produced. Because these costs do not contrast between the alternatives, they are not avoidable. The depreciation cost is a sunk cost that is not avoidable. Nonetheless, the annual lease option of $70,000 is an opportunity cost that can be avoided if they quit producing the frames.

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Opportunity Cost+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($40×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$70,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$800,000+$200,000+$70,000+$70,000+$232,000]=$1,972,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost is $2,122,000.

Determine the avoidable cost per unit:

Avoidable Cost per unit=[Total Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,972,00020,000]=$98.60

Therefore the avoidable cost per unit is $98.60.

Determine the increase in income:

Outsourcing will reduce the cost and increases the income.

Increase in Income=[Number of Units×(Avoidable Cost per unit−Purchase Price)]=[20,000×($98.60−$85)]=[20,000×$13.60]=$272,000

Therefore the increase in income is $272,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the avoidable cost of $98.60 is greater than the purchase cost of $85. Hence, Company CB should outsource the frames. Outsourcing would diminish cost and increments productivity by $272,000.

Therefore, Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

Answer 7

Chapter 13, Problem 26P

a.

To determine

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

Answer 8

a.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Special order decisions: Special order decisions include circumstances in which the board must choose whether to acknowledge abnormal customer orders. These requests or orders normally necessitate special dispensation or include a demand for lesser price.

Decision making: It is a vital capacity in the management, since decision making is identified with issue, a compelling decision making accomplishes the preferred objectives or goals by taking care of such issues.

Sunk cost: A sunk cost, otherwise called a stranded cost, is a cost that has just happened and cannot be transformed or evaded. It is also called as a cost that has just been paid and cannot be discounted or lessened.

Opportunity cost: An opportunity cost is the financial idea of potential profits that an organization surrenders by making an elective move.

Determine the total avoidable costs:

The facility-sustaining costs and stock holding costs about 20% remain the equivalent irrespective of whether frames are obtained or produced. Because these costs do not contrast between the alternatives, they are not avoidable. The depreciation cost is a sunk cost that is not avoidable. Nonetheless, the annual lease option of $70,000 is an opportunity cost that can be avoided if they quit producing the frames.

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Opportunity Cost+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($40×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$70,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$800,000+$200,000+$70,000+$70,000+$232,000]=$1,972,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost is $2,122,000.

Determine the avoidable cost per unit:

Avoidable Cost per unit=[Total Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,972,00020,000]=$98.60

Therefore the avoidable cost per unit is $98.60.

Determine the increase in income:

Outsourcing will reduce the cost and increases the income.

Increase in Income=[Number of Units×(Avoidable Cost per unit−Purchase Price)]=[20,000×($98.60−$85)]=[20,000×$13.60]=$272,000

Therefore the increase in income is $272,000.

Answer 9

a.

Expert Solution

Answer 10

a.

Expert Solution

Answer 11

Expert Solution

Answer 12

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the avoidable cost of $98.60 is greater than the purchase cost of $85. Hence, Company CB should outsource the frames. Outsourcing would diminish cost and increments productivity by $272,000.

Therefore, Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

Answer 13

b.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

b.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs of old equipment:

Avoidable Costold Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Oppurtunitycost of lease equipment]=[($40×20,000)+$70,000]=$800,000 + $70,000= $870,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of old equipment is $870,000.

Determine the unit level labour costs:

Unit Level Labor Costs=[Actual Labor Cost×(1−Change in Labor Cost)]=[$40×(1−60%)]=$16

Determine the depreciation cost:

Depreciation Cost=[Cost of New Equipment−Salvage ValueNumber of Years]=[$910,000−$70,0004]=[$840,0004]=$210,000

Therefore the depreciation cost is $210,000.

Determine the total avoidable costs of new equipment:

Avoidable CostNew Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Depreciation Cost]=[($16×20,000)+$210,000]=$530,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of new equipment is $530,000.

Determine the cost per unit of old equipment:

Cost per unitOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$870,00020,000]=$43.50

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $43.50.

Determine the cost per unit of new equipment:

Cost per unitNew Equipment=[Avoidable CostNew EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$530,00020,000]=$26.50

Therefore the cost per unit of new equipment is $26.50.

Determine the avoidable costs of using the old equipment:

Avoidable CostOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld Equipment−Avoidable CostNew Equipment]=[$870,000−$530,000]=$340,000

Therefore the avoidable cost of using the old equipment is $340,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost of depreciation of the new equipment is certifiably not a sunk cost for this situation on the grounds that the new equipment has not been bought. The avoidable cost of utilizing the current equipment is $340,000 greater than that of utilizing the new equipment. Thus, replacing the current equipment with the new equipment will build the organization's income by $340,000.

Therefore Company CB should replace the current equipment.

Answer 14

b.

To determine

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

Answer 15

b.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs of old equipment:

Avoidable Costold Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Oppurtunitycost of lease equipment]=[($40×20,000)+$70,000]=$800,000 + $70,000= $870,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of old equipment is $870,000.

Determine the unit level labour costs:

Unit Level Labor Costs=[Actual Labor Cost×(1−Change in Labor Cost)]=[$40×(1−60%)]=$16

Determine the depreciation cost:

Depreciation Cost=[Cost of New Equipment−Salvage ValueNumber of Years]=[$910,000−$70,0004]=[$840,0004]=$210,000

Therefore the depreciation cost is $210,000.

Determine the total avoidable costs of new equipment:

Avoidable CostNew Equipment=[Unit Labor Cost+Depreciation Cost]=[($16×20,000)+$210,000]=$530,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost of new equipment is $530,000.

Determine the cost per unit of old equipment:

Cost per unitOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$870,00020,000]=$43.50

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $43.50.

Determine the cost per unit of new equipment:

Cost per unitNew Equipment=[Avoidable CostNew EquipmentNumber of Units]=[$530,00020,000]=$26.50

Therefore the cost per unit of new equipment is $26.50.

Determine the avoidable costs of using the old equipment:

Avoidable CostOld Equipment=[Avoidable CostOld Equipment−Avoidable CostNew Equipment]=[$870,000−$530,000]=$340,000

Therefore the avoidable cost of using the old equipment is $340,000.

Answer 16

b.

Expert Solution

Answer 17

b.

Expert Solution

Answer 18

Expert Solution

Answer 19

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost of depreciation of the new equipment is certifiably not a sunk cost for this situation on the grounds that the new equipment has not been bought. The avoidable cost of utilizing the current equipment is $340,000 greater than that of utilizing the new equipment. Thus, replacing the current equipment with the new equipment will build the organization's income by $340,000.

Therefore Company CB should replace the current equipment.

Answer 20

c.

To determine

Whether Company CB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

c.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Depreciation Expense+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($16×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$210,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$320,000+$200,000+$70,000+$210,000+$232,000]=$1,632,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost between two alternatives is $1,632,000.

Determine the cost per unit between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Cost per unit=[Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,632,00020,000]=$81.60

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $81.60.

Determine the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives:

Difference=[Actual Cost−Cost per unit]=[$85−$81.60]=$3.40

Therefore the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives is $3.40.

Determine the increase in profitability:

Increase in Profitability=[Number of Units×Difference in Cost per unit]=[$3.40×20,000]=$68,000

Therefore the increase in profitability is $68,000.

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost per unit is $81.60, the savings from replacing the old equipment is $3.40 per frame and the increase in profitability is $68,000. Hence the old equipment should be replaced.

Therefore Company CB should replace the old equipment.

Answer 21

c.

To determine

Whether Company CB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

Answer 22

c.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

Determine the total avoidable costs between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Avoidable Cost=[Unit Material Cost+Unit Labor Cost+Unit Overhead Cost+Supervisor Salary+Depreciation Expense+Inventory Holding Costs]=[($30×20,000)+($16×20,000)+($10×20,000)+$70,000+$210,000+($290,000×0.80)]=[$600,000+$320,000+$200,000+$70,000+$210,000+$232,000]=$1,632,000

Therefore the total avoidable cost between two alternatives is $1,632,000.

Determine the cost per unit between two alternatives (old and new equipment):

Cost per unit=[Avoidable CostNumber of Units]=[$1,632,00020,000]=$81.60

Therefore the cost per unit of old equipment is $81.60.

Determine the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives:

Difference=[Actual Cost−Cost per unit]=[$85−$81.60]=$3.40

Therefore the difference of cost per unit between two alternatives is $3.40.

Determine the increase in profitability:

Increase in Profitability=[Number of Units×Difference in Cost per unit]=[$3.40×20,000]=$68,000

Therefore the increase in profitability is $68,000.

Answer 23

c.

Expert Solution

Answer 24

c.

Expert Solution

Answer 25

Expert Solution

Answer 26

Conclusion

From the results obtained above, the cost per unit is $81.60, the savings from replacing the old equipment is $3.40 per frame and the increase in profitability is $68,000. Hence the old equipment should be replaced.

Therefore Company CB should replace the old equipment.

Answer 27

d.

To determine

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

d.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimizes the risk of establishing supplier relationship is as follows:

Before focusing on the outsourcing decision, Company CB must think about the capacity of the provider or suppliers to deliver the frames as per the organization's quality principles. Likewise, Company CB must guarantee itself that the frames will be conveyed on a convenient premise. By outsourcing, Company CB is dropping the advantages of vertical integration.

The organization is reliant on the provider's enactment. The loss of control should be weighed in contradiction of the advantages of cost reduction. Company CB can shield itself from problematic providers by keeping up a rundown of licensed providers. Company CB should furnish these providers with hikes or incentives for providing exceptional services, for example, amount buys and quick invoice payment so as to increase favoured customer standing.

Answer 28

d.

To determine

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

Answer 29

d.

Expert Solution

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimizes the risk of establishing supplier relationship is as follows:

Before focusing on the outsourcing decision, Company CB must think about the capacity of the provider or suppliers to deliver the frames as per the organization's quality principles. Likewise, Company CB must guarantee itself that the frames will be conveyed on a convenient premise. By outsourcing, Company CB is dropping the advantages of vertical integration.

The organization is reliant on the provider's enactment. The loss of control should be weighed in contradiction of the advantages of cost reduction. Company CB can shield itself from problematic providers by keeping up a rundown of licensed providers. Company CB should furnish these providers with hikes or incentives for providing exceptional services, for example, amount buys and quick invoice payment so as to increase favoured customer standing.

Answer 30

d.

Expert Solution

Answer 31

d.

Expert Solution

Answer 32

Expert Solution

Answer 33

Ch. 13 - Prob. 1Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 2Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 3Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 4Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 5Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 6Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 7Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 8Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 9Q Ch. 13 - Prob. 10Q

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

Videos

Compute the avoidable cost per unit of making the bike frames, based on the results whether Company CB should outsource the bike frames.

Explanation of Solution

The avoidable cost per unit of produce the bike frames using new equipment and old equipment and the impact on profitability if the frames are made using old equipment versus the new equipment.

Explanation of Solution

Whether Company CB should purchase the new equipment or outsource the bike frame and the impact on profitability between two alternatives.

Explanation of Solution

The qualitative factors Company CB should consider before making a decision to outsource and the ways in which the company minimize the risk of establishing supplier relationship.

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 13 Solutions