a.
Find the
a.

Answer to Problem 69SE
The 95% confidence interval for the slope of the population regression is
Explanation of Solution
Given info:
The data represents the values of the variables height in feet and price in dollars for a sample of warehouses.
Calculation:
Linear regression model:
In a linear equation
A linear regression model is given as
Regression:
Software procedure:
Step by step procedure to obtain regression equation using MINITAB software is given as,
- Choose Stat > Regression > Fit Regression Line.
- In Response (Y), enter the column of Price.
- In Predictor (X), enter the column of Height.
- Click OK.
Output using MINITAB software is given below:
Thus, the regression line for the variables sale price
Therefore, the slope coefficient of the regression equation is
Confidence interval:
The general formula for the confidence interval for the slope of the regression line is,
Where,
From the MINITAB output, the estimate of error standard deviation of slope coefficient is
Since, the level of confidence is not specified. The prior confidence level 95% can be used.
Critical value:
For 95% confidence level,
Degrees of freedom:
The sample size is
The degrees of freedom is,
From Table A.5 of the t-distribution in Appendix A, the critical value corresponding to the right tail area 0.025 and 17 degrees of freedom is 2.110.
Thus, the critical value is
The 95% confidence interval is,
Thus, the 95% confidence interval for the slope of the population regression is
Interpretation:
There is 95% confident, that the expected change in sale price associated with 1 foot increase in height lies between $0.888452 and $1.085948.
c.
Find the interval estimate for the true mean sale price of all warehouses with 25 ft truss height.
c.

Answer to Problem 69SE
The 95% specified confidence interval for the true mean sale price of all warehouses with 25 ft truss height is
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Here, the regression equation is
Expected sale price when the height is 25 feet:
The expected sale price with 25 ft height ware houses is obtained as follows:
Thus, the expected sale price with 25 ft height ware houses is 48.45.
Confidence interval:
The general formula for the
Where,
From the MINITAB output in part (a), the value of the standard error of the estimate is
The value of
i | Truss height x | |
1 | 12 | 144 |
2 | 14 | 196 |
3 | 14 | 196 |
4 | 15 | 225 |
5 | 15 | 225 |
6 | 16 | 256 |
7 | 18 | 324 |
8 | 22 | 484 |
9 | 22 | 484 |
10 | 24 | 576 |
11 | 24 | 576 |
12 | 26 | 676 |
13 | 26 | 676 |
14 | 27 | 729 |
15 | 28 | 784 |
16 | 30 | 900 |
17 | 30 | 900 |
18 | 33 | 1089 |
19 | 36 | 1296 |
Total |
Thus, the total of truss height is
The mean truss height is,
Thus, the mean truss height is
Covariance term
The value of
Thus, the covariance term
Since, the level of confidence is not specified. The prior confidence level 95% can be used.
Critical value:
For 95% confidence level,
Degrees of freedom:
The sample size is
The degrees of freedom is,
From Table A.5 of the t-distribution in Appendix A, the critical value corresponding to the right tail area 0.025 and 17 degrees of freedom is 2.110.
Thus, the critical value is
The 95% confidence interval is,
Thus, the 95% specified confidence interval for the true mean of all warehouses with 25 ft truss height is
Interpretation:
There is 95% specified confidence interval for the true mean of all warehouses with 25 ft truss height lies between $47.730 and $49.172.
d.
Find the prediction interval of sale price for a single warehouse of truss height 25 ft.
Compare the width of the prediction interval with the confidence interval obtained in part (a).
d.

Answer to Problem 69SE
The 95% prediction interval of sale price for a single warehouse of truss height 25 ft is
The prediction interval is wider than the confidence interval.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Here, the regression equation is
From part (c), the the expected sale price with 25 ft height ware houses is
Prediction interval for a single future value:
Prediction interval is used to predict a single value of the focus variable that is to be observed at some future time. In other words it can be said that the prediction interval gives a single future value rather than estimating the mean value of the variable.
The general formula for
where
From the MINITAB output in part (a), the value of the standard error of the estimate is
From part (c), the truss height is
Since, the level of confidence is not specified. The prior confidence level 95% can be used.
Critical value:
For 95% confidence level,
Degrees of freedom:
The sample size is
The degrees of freedom is,
From Table A.5 of the t-distribution in Appendix A, the critical value corresponding to the right tail area 0.025 and 17 degrees of freedom is 2.110.
Thus, the critical value is
The 95% prediction interval is,
Thus, the 95% prediction interval of sale price for a single warehouse of truss height 25 ft is
Interpretation:
For repeated samples, there is 95% confident that the sale price for a single warehouse of truss height 25 ft lies between $45.377 and $51.523.
Comparison:
The 95% prediction interval of sale price for a single warehouse of truss height 25 ft is
Width of the prediction interval:
The width of the 95% prediction interval is,
Thus, the width of the 95% prediction interval is 6.146.
The 95% specified confidence interval for the true mean of all warehouses with 25 ft truss height is
Width of the confidence interval:
The width of the 95% confidence interval is,
Thus, the width of the 95% confidence interval is 1.442.
From, the obtained two widths it is observed that the width of the prediction interval is typically larger than the width of the confidence interval.
Thus, the prediction interval is wider than the confidence interval.
e.
Compare the width of the 95% prediction interval of sale price of ware houses for 25 ft truss height and for 30 ft truss height.
e.

Answer to Problem 69SE
The 95% prediction interval of sale price of ware houses for 30 ft truss height will be wider than the sale price of ware houses for 25 ft truss height.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
Here, the regression equation is
From part (c), the truss height is
Here, the observation
The general formula to obtain
For
For
In the two quantities, the only difference is the values of
In general, the value of the quantity
Therefore, the value
Comparison:
Prediction interval:
The general formula for
The prediction interval will be wider for large value of
Here,
Thus, the prediction interval is wider for
Thus, 95% prediction interval of sale price of ware houses for 30 ft truss height will be wider than the sale price of ware houses for 25 ft truss height.
e.
Find the
e.

Answer to Problem 69SE
The
Explanation of Solution
Calculation:
The coefficient of determination (
The general formula to obtain coefficient of variation is,
From the regression output obtained in part (a), the value of coefficient of determination is 0.9631.
Thus, the coefficient of determination is
Correlation coefficient:
Correlation analysis is used to measure the strength of the association between variables. In other words, it can be said that correlation describes the linear association between quantitative variables.
The general formula to calculate correlation coefficient is,
The coefficient of determination is obtained as follows:
The sign of the correlation coefficient depends on the sign of the slope coefficient.
Here,
Since, the sign of the slope coefficient is positive. The correlation coefficient is positive.
Thus, the correlation coefficient is 0.9814.
Interpretation:
The strength of the association between the variables sale price and truss height is 0.9814. that is, 1 unit increase in one variable is associated with 98.14% increase in the value of the other variable.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
WEBASSIGN ACCESS FOR PROBABILITY & STATS
- You have been hired as an intern to run analyses on the data and report the results back to Sarah; the five questions that Sarah needs you to address are given below. Does there appear to be a positive or negative relationship between price and screen size? Use a scatter plot to examine the relationship. Determine and interpret the correlation coefficient between the two variables. In your interpretation, discuss the direction of the relationship (positive, negative, or zero relationship). Also discuss the strength of the relationship. Estimate the relationship between screen size and price using a simple linear regression model and interpret the estimated coefficients. (In your interpretation, tell the dollar amount by which price will change for each unit of increase in screen size). Include the manufacturer dummy variable (Samsung=1, 0 otherwise) and estimate the relationship between screen size, price and manufacturer dummy as a multiple linear regression model. Interpret the…arrow_forwardDoes there appear to be a positive or negative relationship between price and screen size? Use a scatter plot to examine the relationship. How to take snapshots: if you use a MacBook, press Command+ Shift+4 to take snapshots. If you are using Windows, use the Snipping Tool to take snapshots. Question 1: Determine and interpret the correlation coefficient between the two variables. In your interpretation, discuss the direction of the relationship (positive, negative, or zero relationship). Also discuss the strength of the relationship. Value of correlation coefficient: Direction of the relationship (positive, negative, or zero relationship): Strength of the relationship (strong/moderate/weak): Question 2: Estimate the relationship between screen size and price using a simple linear regression model and interpret the estimated coefficients. In your interpretation, tell the dollar amount by which price will change for each unit of increase in screen size. (The answer for the…arrow_forwardIn this problem, we consider a Brownian motion (W+) t≥0. We consider a stock model (St)t>0 given (under the measure P) by d.St 0.03 St dt + 0.2 St dwt, with So 2. We assume that the interest rate is r = 0.06. The purpose of this problem is to price an option on this stock (which we name cubic put). This option is European-type, with maturity 3 months (i.e. T = 0.25 years), and payoff given by F = (8-5)+ (a) Write the Stochastic Differential Equation satisfied by (St) under the risk-neutral measure Q. (You don't need to prove it, simply give the answer.) (b) Give the price of a regular European put on (St) with maturity 3 months and strike K = 2. (c) Let X = S. Find the Stochastic Differential Equation satisfied by the process (Xt) under the measure Q. (d) Find an explicit expression for X₁ = S3 under measure Q. (e) Using the results above, find the price of the cubic put option mentioned above. (f) Is the price in (e) the same as in question (b)? (Explain why.)arrow_forward
- Problem 4. Margrabe formula and the Greeks (20 pts) In the homework, we determined the Margrabe formula for the price of an option allowing you to swap an x-stock for a y-stock at time T. For stocks with initial values xo, yo, common volatility σ and correlation p, the formula was given by Fo=yo (d+)-x0Þ(d_), where In (±² Ꭲ d+ õ√T and σ = σ√√√2(1 - p). дго (a) We want to determine a "Greek" for ỡ on the option: find a formula for θα (b) Is дго θα positive or negative? (c) We consider a situation in which the correlation p between the two stocks increases: what can you say about the price Fo? (d) Assume that yo< xo and p = 1. What is the price of the option?arrow_forwardWe consider a 4-dimensional stock price model given (under P) by dẴ₁ = µ· Xt dt + йt · ΣdŴt where (W) is an n-dimensional Brownian motion, π = (0.02, 0.01, -0.02, 0.05), 0.2 0 0 0 0.3 0.4 0 0 Σ= -0.1 -4a За 0 0.2 0.4 -0.1 0.2) and a E R. We assume that ☑0 = (1, 1, 1, 1) and that the interest rate on the market is r = 0.02. (a) Give a condition on a that would make stock #3 be the one with largest volatility. (b) Find the diversification coefficient for this portfolio as a function of a. (c) Determine the maximum diversification coefficient d that you could reach by varying the value of a? 2arrow_forwardQuestion 1. Your manager asks you to explain why the Black-Scholes model may be inappro- priate for pricing options in practice. Give one reason that would substantiate this claim? Question 2. We consider stock #1 and stock #2 in the model of Problem 2. Your manager asks you to pick only one of them to invest in based on the model provided. Which one do you choose and why ? Question 3. Let (St) to be an asset modeled by the Black-Scholes SDE. Let Ft be the price at time t of a European put with maturity T and strike price K. Then, the discounted option price process (ert Ft) t20 is a martingale. True or False? (Explain your answer.) Question 4. You are considering pricing an American put option using a Black-Scholes model for the underlying stock. An explicit formula for the price doesn't exist. In just a few words (no more than 2 sentences), explain how you would proceed to price it. Question 5. We model a short rate with a Ho-Lee model drt = ln(1+t) dt +2dWt. Then the interest rate…arrow_forward
- In this problem, we consider a Brownian motion (W+) t≥0. We consider a stock model (St)t>0 given (under the measure P) by d.St 0.03 St dt + 0.2 St dwt, with So 2. We assume that the interest rate is r = 0.06. The purpose of this problem is to price an option on this stock (which we name cubic put). This option is European-type, with maturity 3 months (i.e. T = 0.25 years), and payoff given by F = (8-5)+ (a) Write the Stochastic Differential Equation satisfied by (St) under the risk-neutral measure Q. (You don't need to prove it, simply give the answer.) (b) Give the price of a regular European put on (St) with maturity 3 months and strike K = 2. (c) Let X = S. Find the Stochastic Differential Equation satisfied by the process (Xt) under the measure Q. (d) Find an explicit expression for X₁ = S3 under measure Q. (e) Using the results above, find the price of the cubic put option mentioned above. (f) Is the price in (e) the same as in question (b)? (Explain why.)arrow_forwardThe managing director of a consulting group has the accompanying monthly data on total overhead costs and professional labor hours to bill to clients. Complete parts a through c. Question content area bottom Part 1 a. Develop a simple linear regression model between billable hours and overhead costs. Overhead Costsequals=212495.2212495.2plus+left parenthesis 42.4857 right parenthesis42.485742.4857times×Billable Hours (Round the constant to one decimal place as needed. Round the coefficient to four decimal places as needed. Do not include the $ symbol in your answers.) Part 2 b. Interpret the coefficients of your regression model. Specifically, what does the fixed component of the model mean to the consulting firm? Interpret the fixed term, b 0b0, if appropriate. Choose the correct answer below. A. The value of b 0b0 is the predicted billable hours for an overhead cost of 0 dollars. B. It is not appropriate to interpret b 0b0, because its value…arrow_forwardUsing the accompanying Home Market Value data and associated regression line, Market ValueMarket Valueequals=$28,416+$37.066×Square Feet, compute the errors associated with each observation using the formula e Subscript ieiequals=Upper Y Subscript iYiminus−ModifyingAbove Upper Y with caret Subscript iYi and construct a frequency distribution and histogram. LOADING... Click the icon to view the Home Market Value data. Question content area bottom Part 1 Construct a frequency distribution of the errors, e Subscript iei. (Type whole numbers.) Error Frequency minus−15 comma 00015,000less than< e Subscript iei less than or equals≤minus−10 comma 00010,000 0 minus−10 comma 00010,000less than< e Subscript iei less than or equals≤minus−50005000 5 minus−50005000less than< e Subscript iei less than or equals≤0 21 0less than< e Subscript iei less than or equals≤50005000 9…arrow_forward
- The managing director of a consulting group has the accompanying monthly data on total overhead costs and professional labor hours to bill to clients. Complete parts a through c Overhead Costs Billable Hours345000 3000385000 4000410000 5000462000 6000530000 7000545000 8000arrow_forwardUsing the accompanying Home Market Value data and associated regression line, Market ValueMarket Valueequals=$28,416plus+$37.066×Square Feet, compute the errors associated with each observation using the formula e Subscript ieiequals=Upper Y Subscript iYiminus−ModifyingAbove Upper Y with caret Subscript iYi and construct a frequency distribution and histogram. Square Feet Market Value1813 911001916 1043001842 934001814 909001836 1020002030 1085001731 877001852 960001793 893001665 884001852 1009001619 967001690 876002370 1139002373 1131001666 875002122 1161001619 946001729 863001667 871001522 833001484 798001589 814001600 871001484 825001483 787001522 877001703 942001485 820001468 881001519 882001518 885001483 765001522 844001668 909001587 810001782 912001483 812001519 1007001522 872001684 966001581 86200arrow_forwarda. Find the value of A.b. Find pX(x) and py(y).c. Find pX|y(x|y) and py|X(y|x)d. Are x and y independent? Why or why not?arrow_forward
- Holt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGALGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillCollege Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage Learning
- Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin HarcourtFunctions and Change: A Modeling Approach to Coll...AlgebraISBN:9781337111348Author:Bruce Crauder, Benny Evans, Alan NoellPublisher:Cengage LearningAlgebra: Structure And Method, Book 1AlgebraISBN:9780395977224Author:Richard G. Brown, Mary P. Dolciani, Robert H. Sorgenfrey, William L. ColePublisher:McDougal Littell





