
To test: the null hypothesis and show that it is rejected at the

Explanation of Solution
Given information :
Department | A | B | C | D | E | F | Total |
Male | 825 | 560 | 325 | 417 | 191 | 373 | 2691 |
Female | 108 | 25 | 593 | 375 | 393 | 341 | 1835 |
Total | 933 | 585 | 918 | 792 | 584 | 714 | 4526 |
Concept Involved:
In order to decide whether the presumed hypothesis for data sample stands accurate for the entire population or not we use the hypothesis testing.
The value of test statistics and the critical value identified from the table help us to decide whether to reject or do not reject null hypothesis.
The critical value from Table A.4, using degrees of freedom of
If
The values of two qualitative variables are connected and denoted in a contingency table.
This table consists of rows and column. The variables in each row and each column of the table represent a category.
The number of rows of contingency table is represented by letter ‘r’ and number of column of contingency table is represented by letter ‘c’.
The formula to find the number of degree of freedom of contingency table is
Calculation:
Finding the expected frequency for the cell corresponding to: | The expected frequency |
Number of male applicantsin department A The row total is 2691, the column total is 933, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of male applicantsin department B The row total is 2691, the column total is 585, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of male applicantsin department C The row total is 2691, the column total is 918, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of male applicantsin department D The row total is 2691, the column total is 792, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of male applicantsin department E The row total is 2691, the column total is 584, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of male applicantsin department F The row total is 2691, the column total is 714, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of female applicantsin department A The row total is 1835, the column total is 933, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of female applicantsin department B The row total is 1835, the column total is 585, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of female applicantsin department C The row total is 1835, the column total is 918, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of female applicantsin department D The row total is 1835, the column total is 792, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of female applicantsin department E The row total is 1835, the column total is 584, and the grand total is 4526. | |
Number of female applicantsin department F The row total is 1835, the column total is 714, and the grand total is 4526. |
All the expected frequencies are at least 5. From the results of previous part we have the below table:
Finding the value of the chi-square corresponding to: | |
Number of male applicantsin department A The observed frequency is 825 and expected frequency is 554.73 | |
Number of male applicantsin department B The observed frequency is 560 and expected frequency is 347.82 | |
Number of male applicantsin department C The observed frequency is 325 and expected frequency is 545.81 | |
Number of male applicantsin department D The observed frequency is 417 and expected frequency is 470.90 | |
Number of male applicantsin department E The observed frequency is 191 and expected frequency is 347.23 | |
Number of male applicantsin department F The observed frequency is 373 and expected frequency is 424.52 | |
Number of female applicantsin department A The observed frequency is 108 and expected frequency is 378.27 | |
Number of female applicantsin department B The observed frequency is 25 and expected frequency is 237.18 | |
Number of female applicantsin department C The observed frequency is 593 and expected frequency is 372.19 | |
Number of female applicantsin department D The observed frequency is 375 and expected frequency is 321.10 | |
Number of female applicantsin department E The observed frequency is 393 and expected frequency is 236.77 | |
Number of female applicantsin department F The observed frequency is 341 and expected frequency is 289.48 |
To compute the test statistics, we use the observed frequencies and expected frequency:
Here r represents the number of rows and c represents the number of columns.
Given
Degrees of freedom | Table A.4 Critical Values for the chi-square Distribution | |||||||||
0.995 | 0.99 | 0.975 | 0.95 | 0.90 | 0.10 | 0.05 | 0.025 | 0.01 | 0.005 | |
1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.016 | 2.706 | 3.841 | 5.024 | 6.635 | 7.879 |
2 | 0.010 | 0.020 | 0.051 | 0.103 | 0.211 | 4.605 | 5.991 | 7.378 | 9.210 | 10.597 |
3 | 0.072 | 0.115 | 0.216 | 0.352 | 0.584 | 6.251 | 7.815 | 9.348 | 11.345 | 12.838 |
4 | 0.207 | 0.297 | 0.484 | 0.711 | 1.064 | 7.779 | 9.488 | 11.143 | 13.277 | 14.860 |
5 | 0.412 | 0.554 | 0.831 | 1.145 | 1.610 | 9.236 | 11.070 | 12.833 | 15.086 | 16.750 |
Conclusion:
Test statistic: 1068.37; Critical value: 15.086.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
Connect Hosted by ALEKS Access Card or Elementary Statistics
- Table of hours of television watched per week: 11 15 24 34 36 22 20 30 12 32 24 36 42 36 42 26 37 39 48 35 26 29 27 81276 40 54 47 KARKE 31 35 42 75 35 46 36 42 65 28 54 65 28 23 28 23669 34 43 35 36 16 19 19 28212 Using the data above, construct a frequency table according the following classes: Number of Hours Frequency Relative Frequency 10-19 20-29 |30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70-79 80-89 From the frequency table above, find a) the lower class limits b) the upper class limits c) the class width d) the class boundaries Statistics 300 Frequency Tables and Pictures of Data, page 2 Using your frequency table, construct a frequency and a relative frequency histogram labeling both axes.arrow_forwardA study was undertaken to compare respiratory responses of hypnotized and unhypnotized subjects. The following data represent total ventilation measured in liters of air per minute per square meter of body area for two independent (and randomly chosen) samples. Analyze these data using the appropriate non-parametric hypothesis test. Unhypnotized: 5.0 5.3 5.3 5.4 5.9 6.2 6.6 6.7 Hypnotized: 5.8 5.9 6.2 6.6 6.7 6.1 7.3 7.4arrow_forwardThe class will include a data exercise where students will be introduced to publicly available data sources. Students will gain experience in manipulating data from the web and applying it to understanding the economic and demographic conditions of regions in the U.S. Regions and topics of focus will be determined (by the student with instructor approval) prior to April. What data exercise can I do to fulfill this requirement? Please explain.arrow_forward
- Consider the ceocomp dataset of compensation information for the CEO’s of 100 U.S. companies. We wish to fit aregression model to assess the relationship between CEO compensation in thousands of dollars (includes salary andbonus, but not stock gains) and the following variates:AGE: The CEOs age, in yearsEDUCATN: The CEO’s education level (1 = no college degree; 2 = college/undergrad. degree; 3 = grad. degree)BACKGRD: Background type(1= banking/financial; 2 = sales/marketing; 3 = technical; 4 = legal; 5 = other)TENURE: Number of years employed by the firmEXPER: Number of years as the firm CEOSALES: Sales revenues, in millions of dollarsVAL: Market value of the CEO's stock, in natural logarithm unitsPCNTOWN: Percentage of firm's market value owned by the CEOPROF: Profits of the firm, before taxes, in millions of dollars1) Create a scatterplot matrix for this dataset. Briefly comment on the observed relationships between compensationand the other variates.Note that companies with negative…arrow_forward6 (Model Selection, Estimation and Prediction of GARCH) Consider the daily returns rt of General Electric Company stock (ticker: "GE") from "2021-01-01" to "2024-03-31", comprising a total of 813 daily returns. Using the "fGarch" package of R, outputs of fitting three GARCH models to the returns are given at the end of this question. Model 1 ARCH (1) with standard normal innovations; Model 2 Model 3 GARCH (1, 1) with Student-t innovations; GARCH (2, 2) with Student-t innovations; Based on the outputs, answer the following questions. (a) What can be inferred from the Standardized Residual Tests conducted on Model 1? (b) Which model do you recommend for prediction between Model 2 and Model 3? Why? (c) Write down the fitted model for the model that you recommended in Part (b). (d) Using the model recommended in Part (b), predict the conditional volatility in the next trading day, specifically trading day 814.arrow_forward4 (MLE of ARCH) Suppose rt follows ARCH(2) with E(rt) = 0, rt = ut, ut = στει, σε where {+} is a sequence of independent and identically distributed (iid) standard normal random variables. With observations r₁,...,, write down the log-likelihood function for the model esti- mation.arrow_forward
- 5 (Moments of GARCH) For the GARCH(2,2) model rt = 0.2+0.25u1+0.05u-2 +0.30% / -1 +0.20% -2, find cov(rt). 0.0035 ut, ut = στει,στ =arrow_forwardDefinition of null hypothesis from the textbook Definition of alternative hypothesis from the textbook Imagine this: you suspect your beloved Chicken McNugget is shrinking. Inflation is hitting everything else, so why not the humble nugget too, right? But your sibling thinks you’re just being dramatic—maybe you’re just extra hungry today. Determined to prove them wrong, you take matters (and nuggets) into your own hands. You march into McDonald’s, get two 20-piece boxes, and head home like a scientist on a mission. Now, before you start weighing each nugget like they’re precious gold nuggets, let’s talk hypotheses. The average weight of nuggets as mentioned on the box is 16 g each. Develop your null and alternative hypotheses separately. Next, you weigh each nugget with the precision of a jeweler and find they average out to 15.5 grams. You also conduct a statistical analysis, and the p-value turns out to be 0.01. Based on this information, answer the following questions. (Remember,…arrow_forwardBusiness Discussarrow_forward
- Cape Fear Community Colle X ALEKS ALEKS - Dorothy Smith - Sec X www-awu.aleks.com/alekscgi/x/Isl.exe/10_u-IgNslkr7j8P3jH-IQ1w4xc5zw7yX8A9Q43nt5P1XWJWARE... Section 7.1,7.2,7.3 HW 三 Question 21 of 28 (1 point) | Question Attempt: 5 of Unlimited The proportion of phones that have more than 47 apps is 0.8783 Part: 1 / 2 Part 2 of 2 (b) Find the 70th The 70th percentile of the number of apps. Round the answer to two decimal places. percentile of the number of apps is Try again Skip Part Recheck Save 2025 Mcarrow_forwardHi, I need to sort out where I went wrong. So, please us the data attached and run four separate regressions, each using the Recruiters rating as the dependent variable and GMAT, Accept Rate, Salary, and Enrollment, respectively, as a single independent variable. Interpret this equation. Round your answers to four decimal places, if necessary. If your answer is negative number, enter "minus" sign. Equation for GMAT: Ŷ = _______ + _______ GMAT Equation for Accept Rate: Ŷ = _______ + _______ Accept Rate Equation for Salary: Ŷ = _______ + _______ Salary Equation for Enrollment: Ŷ = _______ + _______ Enrollmentarrow_forwardQuestion 21 of 28 (1 point) | Question Attempt: 5 of Unlimited Dorothy ✔ ✓ 12 ✓ 13 ✓ 14 ✓ 15 ✓ 16 ✓ 17 ✓ 18 ✓ 19 ✓ 20 = 21 22 > How many apps? According to a website, the mean number of apps on a smartphone in the United States is 82. Assume the number of apps is normally distributed with mean 82 and standard deviation 30. Part 1 of 2 (a) What proportion of phones have more than 47 apps? Round the answer to four decimal places. The proportion of phones that have more than 47 apps is 0.8783 Part: 1/2 Try again kip Part ی E Recheck == == @ W D 80 F3 151 E R C レ Q FA 975 % T B F5 10 の 000 园 Save For Later Submit Assignment © 2025 McGraw Hill LLC. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Center | Accessibility Y V& U H J N * 8 M I K O V F10 P = F11 F12 . darrow_forward
- Mathematics For Machine TechnologyAdvanced MathISBN:9781337798310Author:Peterson, John.Publisher:Cengage Learning,Big Ideas Math A Bridge To Success Algebra 1: Stu...AlgebraISBN:9781680331141Author:HOUGHTON MIFFLIN HARCOURTPublisher:Houghton Mifflin HarcourtAlgebra & Trigonometry with Analytic GeometryAlgebraISBN:9781133382119Author:SwokowskiPublisher:Cengage
- Glencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw HillHolt Mcdougal Larson Pre-algebra: Student Edition...AlgebraISBN:9780547587776Author:HOLT MCDOUGALPublisher:HOLT MCDOUGALLinear Algebra: A Modern IntroductionAlgebraISBN:9781285463247Author:David PoolePublisher:Cengage Learning




