a)
To Explain: The importance of spending on research and development with growth in focus and how the necessity and quality of research impacts on the moneys spent.
b)
To Explain: The impact of an international treaty that secures a nation’s patents on the appropriability and fertility of R&D spending in the long run.
c)
To Explain: The impact of tax credits received on every dollar spent on R&D on the appropriability and fertility of R&D spending in the long run.
d)
To Explain: The impact of a decline in government funded conferences among academic and corporate bodies on the appropriability and fertility of R&D spending in the long run.
e)
To Explain: The impact of eliminating the patent rights of medical drugs that are breakthrough in nature on the appropriability and fertility of R&D spending in the long run.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solution
Chapter 12 Solutions
Macroeconomics, Student Value Edition Plus MyLab Economics with Pearson eText -- Access Card Package (7th Edition)
- Everything is in attached picture. 23arrow_forward1) Use the supply and demand schedules to graph the supply and demand functions. Find and show on the graph the equilibrium price and quantity, label it (A). P Q demanded P Q supplied 0 75 0 0 5 65 5 0 10 55 10 0 15 45 15 10 20 35 20 20 25 25 25 30 30 15 30 40 35 40 5 0 35 40 50 60 2) Find graphically and numerically the consumers and producers' surplus 3) The government introduced a tax of 10$, Label the price buyers pay and suppliers receive. Label the new equilibrium for buyers (B) and Sellers (S). How the surpluses have changed? Give the numerical answer and show on the graph. 4) Calculate using midpoint method the elasticity of demand curve from point (A) to (B) and elasticity of the supply curve from point (A) to (C).arrow_forwardFour heirs (A, B, C, and D) must divide fairly an estate consisting of three items — a house, a cabin and a boat — using the method of sealed bids. The players' bids (in dollars) are: In the initial allocation, player D Group of answer choices gets no items and gets $62,500 from the estate. gets the house and pays the estate $122,500. gets the cabin and gets $7,500 from the estate. gets the boat and and gets $55,500 from the estate. none of thesearrow_forward
- Jack and Jill are getting a divorce. Except for the house, they own very little of value so they agree to divide the house fairly using the method of sealed bids. Jack bids 140,000 and Jill bids 160,000. After all is said and done, the final outcome is Group of answer choices Jill gets the house and pays Jack $80,000. Jill gets the house and pays Jack $75,000. Jill gets the house and pays Jack $70,000. Jill gets the house and pays Jack $65,000. none of thesearrow_forwardThe problem statement never defines whether the loan had compound or simple interest. The readings indicate that the diference in those will be learned later, and the formula used fro this answer was not in the chapter. Should it be assumbed that a simple interest caluclaton should be used?arrow_forwardNot use ai pleasearrow_forward
Macroeconomics: Private and Public Choice (MindTa...EconomicsISBN:9781305506756Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
Economics: Private and Public Choice (MindTap Cou...EconomicsISBN:9781305506725Author:James D. Gwartney, Richard L. Stroup, Russell S. Sobel, David A. MacphersonPublisher:Cengage Learning
