In 1969, at the age of seventeen, Person A began working for company P. She had reached the rank of a bookkeeper, chief of office and right-hand treasurer by 2007. The board of chiefs of company P, in recognition of their capacity, dedication, and long service time, agreed to increase the month-to-month salary of Individual A to $4,000 and make a retirement plan. The agreement allowed person A to be granted the privilege of withdrawing from the complex contract if she wished to accept a retirement payment of $2,000 per month for life, even though the board expressed in faith that Person A would continue to represent the organization for a long time. Person A, as it may be, agreed to resign two a long time later. Company F has paid her retirement pay to Person A until 2016. The business suspended instalments from that point on. To discuss: The arguments that the company’s promise to pay person A $2,000 per month for life is enforceable.

Question

Want to see the full answer?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1TS

Summary Introduction

Case summary:

In 1969, at the age of seventeen, Person A began working for company P. She had reached the rank of a bookkeeper, chief of office and right-hand treasurer by 2007. The board of chiefs of company P, in recognition of their capacity, dedication, and long service time, agreed to increase the month-to-month salary of Individual A to $4,000 and make a retirement plan. The agreement allowed person A to be granted the privilege of withdrawing from the complex contract if she wished to accept a retirement payment of $2,000 per month for life, even though the board expressed in faith that Person A would continue to represent the organization for a long time. Person A, as it may be, agreed to resign two a long time later. Company F has paid her retirement pay to Person A until 2016. The business suspended instalments from that point on.

To discuss: The arguments that the company’s promise to pay person A $2,000 per month for life is enforceable.

Expert Solution & Answer

Want to see the full answer?

Check out a sample textbook solution

See solution

Students have asked these similar questions

You are the newest member of an international HR staff at Transnational Electronics (TE). Your manager wants to improve productivity in the Delhi, India factory, where two hundred (200) are employed. Your boss has proposed rank ordering (top to bottom) each department’s employees based on their demonstrated performance and laying off the bottom 15% within 30 days from today. The employment seniority distribution is: 25 + years 101 10 to 24 40 5 to 9 16 4 years 8 3 years 9 2 years 12 1 year 8 1 - 11 months 6 What should be the human resource strategy and response be on this topic?

your manager wants to improve productivity in the Delhi, India factory, where two hundred (200) are employed. Your boss has proposed rank ordering (top to bottom) each department’s employees based on their demonstrated performance and laying off the bottom 15% within 30 days from today. The employment seniority distribution is: 25 + years 101 10 to 24 40 5 to 9 16 4 years 8 3 years 9 2 years 12 1 year 8 1 - 11 months 6 What are the major issues faced by the firm in regards to this proposal based on Indian labor laws?

What other cases can be linked to Wells Fargo's Unauthorized Customer Accounts? What are the similarities, what are the small differences?