Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Textbook Question

Chapter 1.2, Problem 1LO

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

02:36

Students have asked these similar questions

65% of all violent felons in the prison system are repeat offenders. If 43 violent felons are randomly selected, find the probability that a. Exactly 28 of them are repeat offenders. b. At most 28 of them are repeat offenders. c. At least 28 of them are repeat offenders. d. Between 22 and 26 (including 22 and 26) of them are repeat offenders.

08:34 ◄ Classroom 07:59 Probs. 5-32/33 D ا. 89 5-34. Determine the horizontal and vertical components of reaction at the pin A and the normal force at the smooth peg B on the member. A 0,4 m 0.4 m Prob. 5-34 F=600 N fr th ar 0. 163586 5-37. The wooden plank resting between the buildings deflects slightly when it supports the 50-kg boy. This deflection causes a triangular distribution of load at its ends. having maximum intensities of w, and wg. Determine w and wg. each measured in N/m. when the boy is standing 3 m from one end as shown. Neglect the mass of the plank. 0.45 m 3 m

Examine the Variables: Carefully review and note the names of all variables in the dataset. Examples of these variables include: Mileage (mpg) Number of Cylinders (cyl) Displacement (disp) Horsepower (hp) Research: Google to understand these variables. Statistical Analysis: Select mpg variable, and perform the following statistical tests. Once you are done with these tests using mpg variable, repeat the same with hp Mean Median First Quartile (Q1) Second Quartile (Q2) Third Quartile (Q3) Fourth Quartile (Q4) 10th Percentile 70th Percentile Skewness Kurtosis Document Your Results: In RStudio: Before running each statistical test, provide a heading in the format shown at the bottom. “# Mean of mileage – Your name’s command” In Microsoft Word: Once you've completed all tests, take a screenshot of your results in RStudio and paste it into a Microsoft Word document. Make sure that snapshots are very clear. You will need multiple snapshots. Also transfer these results to the…

Answer 2

Textbook Question

Chapter 1.2, Problem 1LO

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

02:36

Answer 3

Textbook Question

Chapter 1.2, Problem 1LO

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

02:36

Answer 4

Textbook Question

Chapter 1.2, Problem 1LO

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

02:36

Answer 5

Textbook Question

Answer 6

Textbook Question

Answer 7

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

To determine

To describe:

Tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing and acquiring knowledge and identify an example and limitation of each method.

Answer 12

Answer to Problem 1LO

Solution:

Tenacity is defined as the one of the most common and dangerous method of accepting new information.

Intuition is defined as the belief that whatever they answer that is true without any evidence.

Answer 13

Explanation of Solution

There are various methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge: tenacity, intuition, authority, the rational method and the empirical method. Tenacity is one of the most commonly used method which tells that the truth is true even when the evidence contradicts whereas the intuition is the method in which believe or guess of a person is considered without any evidence. The limitation to tenacity method is that it is strong in terms of belief even in the presence of proof/evidence. Therefore this method might not be accurate. The intuition is a good

as it supports us to develop our confidence but sometimes it is harmful because intuition may not be right always as there are evidences available against the intuition but one does not believe as he/she may be overconfident about that.

Conclusion:

Tenacity and intuition are the methods for acquiring knowledge. Tenacity is the method in which truth is considered as true even if the evidence is against in that truth whereas the intuition means believe or guess in the absence of evidence.

Justification:

As the tenacity tells that the truth is true even if there is absence of support in terms of evidence such as in the research work, if our research is true and evidence, that is, another research paper is in against of our research paper, we consider that our research is correct. In some competitive examinations, sometimes the options given for the particular question may not correct then, in that case, one ticks the correct option on the basis of his/her intuition.

Answer 14

Ch. 1.2 - Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of...Ch. 1.2 - Describe and identify an example of the method of...Ch. 1.2 - Describe and identify an example of the rational...Ch. 1.2 - Describe and identify an example of the empirical...Ch. 1.3 - Identify and describe the steps of the scientific...Ch. 1.3 - Prob. 6LO Ch. 1.3 - Prob. 7LO Ch. 1.3 - Prob. 8LO Ch. 1.3 - Explain the distinction between science and...Ch. 1.4 - Describe the difference between qualitative and...

Describe tenacity and intuition as methods of knowing or acquiring knowledge. Identify an example and explain the limitations of each method.

Concept explainers

Videos

Answer to Problem 1LO

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 1 Solutions