The conclusions of trait theories of leadership. Introduction: Trait theories of leadership gives an overview of the reason why some people are good effective leaders than others with regard to the personality and characteristics rather that the situation or the context . The significant assumption made in trait theories is, that leaders are born and not made that leads these individuals to possess the ideal and right qualities and characteristic that makes them successful in decision making and task accomplishments. Some of the common leadership traits found are; initiative, creativity, flexibility charisma, confidence and more.

Question

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Answer 1

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1CR

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The conclusions of trait theories of leadership.

Introduction:

Trait theories of leadership gives an overview of the reason why some people are good effective leaders than others with regard to the personality and characteristics rather that the situation or the context . The significant assumption made in trait theories is, that leaders are born and not made that leads these individuals to possess the ideal and right qualities and characteristic that makes them successful in decision making and task accomplishments. Some of the common leadership traits found are; initiative, creativity, flexibility charisma, confidence and more.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is highly vital to understand the conclusions of trait theories to understand the difference between successful leaders and ordinary normal leaders. Throughout history it is believed, strong leaders have been described by their traits. Therefore, leadership research has long sought to identify the personality, social, physical, or intellectual attributes that differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Trait theories of leadership focus on personal qualities and characteristics. Leadership emergence and effectiveness are often evaluated separately in the vis-à-vis trait studies, therefore a better understanding can be gained.

For personality, a comprehensive review of the leadership literature organized around the Big Five framework has found extraversion to be the most predictive trait of effective leadership. However, extraversion sometimes relates more to the way leaders emerge than to their effectiveness. Sociable and dominant people are more likely to assert themselves in group situations, which can help extraverts be identified as leaders, but effective leaders are not domineering. One study found leaders who scored very high in assertiveness, a facet of extraversion, were less effective than those who were moderately high. So although extraversion can predict effective leadership, the relationship may be due to unique facets of the trait. Further leaders who inculcate these major characteristic tend to gain the opinions of other colleagues and try to analyze and include these views therefore a better decision would be generated. As a result the leaders make highly effective decisions that drive the organization forward. Further, it is discovered leaders who are willing to work with a range of people and understand their opinions and views are considered to have an overwhelming advantage in leadership.

When analyzing and understanding trait theories it is believed that leaders are born naturally and not made, as it is seen that trait theory of leadership focuses on discovering unique personality traits and characteristics that are linked to successful leadership across a wide variety of situations.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Students have asked these similar questions

1.1 Discuss any FIVE (5) leadership failures of ‘The company founder and former CEO, Elizabeth Holmes’. Identify FIVE (5) elements of leadership and evaluate the outcome of the organisation if each element was used correctly by the former CEO. Your answers should be supported by academic sources where applicable. Make reference to the case study.

write a paper on the topic: The importance of soft skills when hiring. Introduction Definition of soft skills and their relevance in the workplace. A brief overview of the traditional focus on hard skills during hiring. Pros and cons of the topic Importance of the topic Thesis statement: Soft skills are essential for a well-rounded employee, facilitating teamwork, communication, and adaptability. Literature Review: Scholarly review of soft skills definition Scholarly review of the relevance of soft skills for employment A scholarly review of the emergence of soft skills Discussion The role of soft skills in effective communication. Importance of clear expression in team settings. Ability to listen actively and respond appropriately. Examples of how strong communicators can enhance collaboration within teams. The significance of teamwork and interpersonal relationships in the workplace. Soft skills as a foundation for building trust among colleagues. The impact on project…

I have been hired by the Transnational Electronics (TE) Corporation, an international retail electronics company, as their Human Resources Director. I report to the Chief Human Resource officer of the company. TE has over 900 hundred employees in 11 different nations, including Mexico. They have revenues in excess of 1 billion US dollars per year. I need to hire a Training and Development Specialist for the Mexico City, Mexico regional office. what is the purpose of the HR Training and Development specialist and why does this job exist? Where does it fit into the HR function and how does it relate to the corporate structure? What are the differences between this position in the U.S. and one in Mexico City?

Answer 2

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1CR

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The conclusions of trait theories of leadership.

Introduction:

Trait theories of leadership gives an overview of the reason why some people are good effective leaders than others with regard to the personality and characteristics rather that the situation or the context . The significant assumption made in trait theories is, that leaders are born and not made that leads these individuals to possess the ideal and right qualities and characteristic that makes them successful in decision making and task accomplishments. Some of the common leadership traits found are; initiative, creativity, flexibility charisma, confidence and more.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is highly vital to understand the conclusions of trait theories to understand the difference between successful leaders and ordinary normal leaders. Throughout history it is believed, strong leaders have been described by their traits. Therefore, leadership research has long sought to identify the personality, social, physical, or intellectual attributes that differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Trait theories of leadership focus on personal qualities and characteristics. Leadership emergence and effectiveness are often evaluated separately in the vis-à-vis trait studies, therefore a better understanding can be gained.

For personality, a comprehensive review of the leadership literature organized around the Big Five framework has found extraversion to be the most predictive trait of effective leadership. However, extraversion sometimes relates more to the way leaders emerge than to their effectiveness. Sociable and dominant people are more likely to assert themselves in group situations, which can help extraverts be identified as leaders, but effective leaders are not domineering. One study found leaders who scored very high in assertiveness, a facet of extraversion, were less effective than those who were moderately high. So although extraversion can predict effective leadership, the relationship may be due to unique facets of the trait. Further leaders who inculcate these major characteristic tend to gain the opinions of other colleagues and try to analyze and include these views therefore a better decision would be generated. As a result the leaders make highly effective decisions that drive the organization forward. Further, it is discovered leaders who are willing to work with a range of people and understand their opinions and views are considered to have an overwhelming advantage in leadership.

When analyzing and understanding trait theories it is believed that leaders are born naturally and not made, as it is seen that trait theory of leadership focuses on discovering unique personality traits and characteristics that are linked to successful leadership across a wide variety of situations.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 3

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1CR

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The conclusions of trait theories of leadership.

Introduction:

Trait theories of leadership gives an overview of the reason why some people are good effective leaders than others with regard to the personality and characteristics rather that the situation or the context . The significant assumption made in trait theories is, that leaders are born and not made that leads these individuals to possess the ideal and right qualities and characteristic that makes them successful in decision making and task accomplishments. Some of the common leadership traits found are; initiative, creativity, flexibility charisma, confidence and more.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is highly vital to understand the conclusions of trait theories to understand the difference between successful leaders and ordinary normal leaders. Throughout history it is believed, strong leaders have been described by their traits. Therefore, leadership research has long sought to identify the personality, social, physical, or intellectual attributes that differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Trait theories of leadership focus on personal qualities and characteristics. Leadership emergence and effectiveness are often evaluated separately in the vis-à-vis trait studies, therefore a better understanding can be gained.

For personality, a comprehensive review of the leadership literature organized around the Big Five framework has found extraversion to be the most predictive trait of effective leadership. However, extraversion sometimes relates more to the way leaders emerge than to their effectiveness. Sociable and dominant people are more likely to assert themselves in group situations, which can help extraverts be identified as leaders, but effective leaders are not domineering. One study found leaders who scored very high in assertiveness, a facet of extraversion, were less effective than those who were moderately high. So although extraversion can predict effective leadership, the relationship may be due to unique facets of the trait. Further leaders who inculcate these major characteristic tend to gain the opinions of other colleagues and try to analyze and include these views therefore a better decision would be generated. As a result the leaders make highly effective decisions that drive the organization forward. Further, it is discovered leaders who are willing to work with a range of people and understand their opinions and views are considered to have an overwhelming advantage in leadership.

When analyzing and understanding trait theories it is believed that leaders are born naturally and not made, as it is seen that trait theory of leadership focuses on discovering unique personality traits and characteristics that are linked to successful leadership across a wide variety of situations.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 4

Question

Chapter 12, Problem 1CR

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The conclusions of trait theories of leadership.

Introduction:

Trait theories of leadership gives an overview of the reason why some people are good effective leaders than others with regard to the personality and characteristics rather that the situation or the context . The significant assumption made in trait theories is, that leaders are born and not made that leads these individuals to possess the ideal and right qualities and characteristic that makes them successful in decision making and task accomplishments. Some of the common leadership traits found are; initiative, creativity, flexibility charisma, confidence and more.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is highly vital to understand the conclusions of trait theories to understand the difference between successful leaders and ordinary normal leaders. Throughout history it is believed, strong leaders have been described by their traits. Therefore, leadership research has long sought to identify the personality, social, physical, or intellectual attributes that differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Trait theories of leadership focus on personal qualities and characteristics. Leadership emergence and effectiveness are often evaluated separately in the vis-à-vis trait studies, therefore a better understanding can be gained.

For personality, a comprehensive review of the leadership literature organized around the Big Five framework has found extraversion to be the most predictive trait of effective leadership. However, extraversion sometimes relates more to the way leaders emerge than to their effectiveness. Sociable and dominant people are more likely to assert themselves in group situations, which can help extraverts be identified as leaders, but effective leaders are not domineering. One study found leaders who scored very high in assertiveness, a facet of extraversion, were less effective than those who were moderately high. So although extraversion can predict effective leadership, the relationship may be due to unique facets of the trait. Further leaders who inculcate these major characteristic tend to gain the opinions of other colleagues and try to analyze and include these views therefore a better decision would be generated. As a result the leaders make highly effective decisions that drive the organization forward. Further, it is discovered leaders who are willing to work with a range of people and understand their opinions and views are considered to have an overwhelming advantage in leadership.

When analyzing and understanding trait theories it is believed that leaders are born naturally and not made, as it is seen that trait theory of leadership focuses on discovering unique personality traits and characteristics that are linked to successful leadership across a wide variety of situations.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!

Answer 5

Chapter 12, Problem 1CR

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The conclusions of trait theories of leadership.

Introduction:

Trait theories of leadership gives an overview of the reason why some people are good effective leaders than others with regard to the personality and characteristics rather that the situation or the context . The significant assumption made in trait theories is, that leaders are born and not made that leads these individuals to possess the ideal and right qualities and characteristic that makes them successful in decision making and task accomplishments. Some of the common leadership traits found are; initiative, creativity, flexibility charisma, confidence and more.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is highly vital to understand the conclusions of trait theories to understand the difference between successful leaders and ordinary normal leaders. Throughout history it is believed, strong leaders have been described by their traits. Therefore, leadership research has long sought to identify the personality, social, physical, or intellectual attributes that differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Trait theories of leadership focus on personal qualities and characteristics. Leadership emergence and effectiveness are often evaluated separately in the vis-à-vis trait studies, therefore a better understanding can be gained.

For personality, a comprehensive review of the leadership literature organized around the Big Five framework has found extraversion to be the most predictive trait of effective leadership. However, extraversion sometimes relates more to the way leaders emerge than to their effectiveness. Sociable and dominant people are more likely to assert themselves in group situations, which can help extraverts be identified as leaders, but effective leaders are not domineering. One study found leaders who scored very high in assertiveness, a facet of extraversion, were less effective than those who were moderately high. So although extraversion can predict effective leadership, the relationship may be due to unique facets of the trait. Further leaders who inculcate these major characteristic tend to gain the opinions of other colleagues and try to analyze and include these views therefore a better decision would be generated. As a result the leaders make highly effective decisions that drive the organization forward. Further, it is discovered leaders who are willing to work with a range of people and understand their opinions and views are considered to have an overwhelming advantage in leadership.

When analyzing and understanding trait theories it is believed that leaders are born naturally and not made, as it is seen that trait theory of leadership focuses on discovering unique personality traits and characteristics that are linked to successful leadership across a wide variety of situations.

Answer 6

Chapter 12, Problem 1CR

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The conclusions of trait theories of leadership.

Introduction:

Trait theories of leadership gives an overview of the reason why some people are good effective leaders than others with regard to the personality and characteristics rather that the situation or the context . The significant assumption made in trait theories is, that leaders are born and not made that leads these individuals to possess the ideal and right qualities and characteristic that makes them successful in decision making and task accomplishments. Some of the common leadership traits found are; initiative, creativity, flexibility charisma, confidence and more.

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is highly vital to understand the conclusions of trait theories to understand the difference between successful leaders and ordinary normal leaders. Throughout history it is believed, strong leaders have been described by their traits. Therefore, leadership research has long sought to identify the personality, social, physical, or intellectual attributes that differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Trait theories of leadership focus on personal qualities and characteristics. Leadership emergence and effectiveness are often evaluated separately in the vis-à-vis trait studies, therefore a better understanding can be gained.

For personality, a comprehensive review of the leadership literature organized around the Big Five framework has found extraversion to be the most predictive trait of effective leadership. However, extraversion sometimes relates more to the way leaders emerge than to their effectiveness. Sociable and dominant people are more likely to assert themselves in group situations, which can help extraverts be identified as leaders, but effective leaders are not domineering. One study found leaders who scored very high in assertiveness, a facet of extraversion, were less effective than those who were moderately high. So although extraversion can predict effective leadership, the relationship may be due to unique facets of the trait. Further leaders who inculcate these major characteristic tend to gain the opinions of other colleagues and try to analyze and include these views therefore a better decision would be generated. As a result the leaders make highly effective decisions that drive the organization forward. Further, it is discovered leaders who are willing to work with a range of people and understand their opinions and views are considered to have an overwhelming advantage in leadership.

When analyzing and understanding trait theories it is believed that leaders are born naturally and not made, as it is seen that trait theory of leadership focuses on discovering unique personality traits and characteristics that are linked to successful leadership across a wide variety of situations.

Answer 7

Chapter 12, Problem 1CR

Summary Introduction

To determine:

The conclusions of trait theories of leadership.

Introduction:

Trait theories of leadership gives an overview of the reason why some people are good effective leaders than others with regard to the personality and characteristics rather that the situation or the context . The significant assumption made in trait theories is, that leaders are born and not made that leads these individuals to possess the ideal and right qualities and characteristic that makes them successful in decision making and task accomplishments. Some of the common leadership traits found are; initiative, creativity, flexibility charisma, confidence and more.

Answer 8

Expert Solution & Answer

Explanation of Solution

It is highly vital to understand the conclusions of trait theories to understand the difference between successful leaders and ordinary normal leaders. Throughout history it is believed, strong leaders have been described by their traits. Therefore, leadership research has long sought to identify the personality, social, physical, or intellectual attributes that differentiate leaders from non-leaders. Trait theories of leadership focus on personal qualities and characteristics. Leadership emergence and effectiveness are often evaluated separately in the vis-à-vis trait studies, therefore a better understanding can be gained.

For personality, a comprehensive review of the leadership literature organized around the Big Five framework has found extraversion to be the most predictive trait of effective leadership. However, extraversion sometimes relates more to the way leaders emerge than to their effectiveness. Sociable and dominant people are more likely to assert themselves in group situations, which can help extraverts be identified as leaders, but effective leaders are not domineering. One study found leaders who scored very high in assertiveness, a facet of extraversion, were less effective than those who were moderately high. So although extraversion can predict effective leadership, the relationship may be due to unique facets of the trait. Further leaders who inculcate these major characteristic tend to gain the opinions of other colleagues and try to analyze and include these views therefore a better decision would be generated. As a result the leaders make highly effective decisions that drive the organization forward. Further, it is discovered leaders who are willing to work with a range of people and understand their opinions and views are considered to have an overwhelming advantage in leadership.

When analyzing and understanding trait theories it is believed that leaders are born naturally and not made, as it is seen that trait theory of leadership focuses on discovering unique personality traits and characteristics that are linked to successful leadership across a wide variety of situations.

Answer 9

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 10

Expert Solution & Answer

Answer 11

Ch. 12 - Prob. 1CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 2CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 3CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 4CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 5CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 6CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 7CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 8CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 9CR Ch. 12 - Prob. 10CR

Explanation of Solution

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Chapter 12 Solutions