To determine:
The following three graphs show the level of impurities found in a particular source of drinking water.
Chart (a) suggests that the source has a consistently high level of impurities throughout the year.
Chart (b) indicates that the level of impurities jumps up and down throughout the year.
Chart (c) shows an impurity level that is fairly consistent throughout the year—and fairly low.
Introduction: Visuals such as graphs and charts included in a report/ article help to understand the text/ content easily. Those visuals have a strong impact on the readers perception about the information presented. Therefore, it is important to verify the quality of the information presented.

Answer to Problem 1CA
Solution: Visuals are a good way of presenting information. However, visuals can be created in different ways which will give the reader wrong impression. Writers should be careful not to distort information by creating visuals. If the rage is set as 0-500, the graph will show that there are no considerable variations in level of impurities.
Explanation of Solution
Although the visuals are an effective way of presenting information, they can sometimes provide wrong impression to the reader as shown in the above 3 graphs. The above graphs show the same information yet, they provide three different impressions. It is because of the vertical scales used in the graphs. In chart (a), the scale is 0-120 and it shows a fair level of variation of impurities level throughout the year. When consider chart (b), the range is set as 60-110 narrowing the scale compared to chart (a). This chart shows the reader the variation of impurities level is significant and it creates a strong impact on the readers’ impression. The chart (c) has been created by using the same data set, using a wider range 0-200. The graph shows minimum variation of the impurities level throughout year.
If the vertical scale is set to 0-500 spreading the range further compared to chart (c) above, it will further minimize the range of variation of impurities level and the reader would perceive that there is no an impact of impurities level throughout the year.
In this way, using the same data, visuals can be created to give different impressions. Therefore, writers’ task is to give the correct impression by considering the information need of the target audience.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 12 Solutions
MYLAB EXCELLENCE IN BUSSI COMM ETEXT
- 3. Consider the following estimated regression equation, estimated using a sample of firms, where RDis total firm spending on research and development in USD ($), Revenue is total firm revenuein USD ($), and W ages is the firms’ total spending on wages in USD ($) (standard errors inparentheses):RDd = 1000(600)+ 0.5(0.1)Revenue + 1.5(0.5)W ages,(a) Interpret the coefficients on each of the explanatory variables. (b) Which of the three coefficients are statistically significant at the 5% level of significance? Howdo you know? A researcher runs a two-sided statistical test of the null hypothesis that both the coefficients onthe explanatory variables above are jointly equal to 0.25 (mathematically, that β1 = β2 = 0.25),and reports a p-value of 0.045.(c) What does this p-value mean for the outcome of the test? (d) What would an appropriate two-sided alternative hypothesis look like?arrow_forwardhelparrow_forwardBudgeted overhead for Galaxy Manufacturing at the normal capacity of 40,000 direct labor hours is $7 per hour variable and $5 per hour fixed. In April, $460,000 of overhead was incurred while working 41,500 actual hours, when 42,000 standard hours were allowed. What is the overhead controllable variance?arrow_forward
- Desert Rose Electronics implemented a new returns authorization process. Returns require: inspection code (45% weighting), testing report (35% weighting), customer details (20% weighting). If a return scored 38 on inspection, 42 on testing, and 85 on customer details, your task is to identify the weighted acceptance score. Need answerarrow_forwardWhat is its profit marginarrow_forwardNeed help with this question solution general accountingarrow_forward
- 4. Consider the following regression equation, where Google is equal to 1 if an individual in thesample has worked at Google and 0 otherwise, and Earnings is annual earnings in thousands ofpounds (standard errors in parentheses):Earnings \ = 25000(12.5)+ 42000(7.0)Google,(a) Interpret the coefficient on Google.(b) Is the coefficient on Google statistically significant at the 5% level? How do you know?(c) Suppose that instead of Google we had used a variable called NeverGoogle, equal to 1 if anindividual has never worked at Google and 0 otherwise. (i) How would the slope coefficientchange? (ii) What would happen to the intercept? (d) What prevents us from interpreting the coefficient on Google as a causal effect? Give examplesin your answer.arrow_forwardhow much interest will horizon pay?arrow_forwardWhat is the contribution margin ratio of this accounting question?arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education





