![Understanding Basic Statistics](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781337558075/9781337558075_largeCoverImage.gif)
For Problems 5-14, please provide the following information.
(a) What is the level of significance? State the null and alternate hypotheses.
(b) Find the value of the chi-square statistic for the sample. Are all the expected frequencies greater than 5? What sampling distribution will you use? What are the degrees of freedom?
(c) Find or estimate the P-value of the sample test statistic.
(d) Based on your answers in parts (a)-(c), will you reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis that the population fits the specified distribution of categories?
(e) Interpret your conclusion in the context of the application
Meteorology:
I | II | III | IV |
Region under Normal Curve |
|
Expected % from Noraml Curve | Observed Number of Days in 20 Years |
|
|
2.35% | 16 |
|
|
13.5% | 78 |
|
|
34% | 212 |
|
|
34% | 221 |
|
|
13.5% | 81 |
|
|
2.35% | 12 |
(i) Remember that
(ii) Use a 19 level of significance to test the claim that the average daily. July temperature follows a normal distribution with
(i)
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
To explain: The columns I, II and III in the context of this problem.
Explanation of Solution
Let, X represents the average daily temperature (in degrees Fahrenheit), which follows the normal distribution with
The below graph shows normal curve with
We can see that, 2.35% of the data values will lie within 2 standard deviation below the mean and 3 standard deviation below the mean, 13.55% of the data values will lie within 1 standard deviation below the mean and 2 standard deviation below the mean, 34.0% of the data values will lie within mean and 1 standard deviation below the mean and mean.
By empirical rule, approximately 68% of the data values lie within 1 standard deviation on each side of the mean, approximately 95% of the data values lies within 2 standard deviations on each side of the mean and approximately 99.7% of the data values lies within 3 standard deviations on each side of the mean.
(ii)
(a)
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
The level of significance and state the null and alternative hypotheses.
Answer to Problem 9P
Solution: The level of significance is 0.01.
Explanation of Solution
The level of significance,
The null hypothesis for testing is defined as,
The alternative hypothesis is defined as,
(b)
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
To test: The value of chi-square statistic for the sample, whether all the expected frequencies are greater than 5 and also explain the sampling distribution to be used and find degrees of freedom.
Answer to Problem 9P
Solution: The value of chi-square statistic for the sample is 1.5590. Expected frequencies are greater than 5. We have to use chi-square distribution and degrees of freedom are 5.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: To find the
Step 1: Go to Stat > Tables > Chi-square Goodness-of-fit-test.
Step 2: Select ‘Days_20_yrs’ in ‘Observed counts’.
Step 3: Choose ‘Normal_curve’ in ‘Proportions specified by Historical counts’. Then click on OK.
The Minitab output is:
Chi-Square Goodness-of-Fit Test
Category | Observed | Historical Counts |
Test Proportion |
Expected | Contribution to Chi-Square |
1 | 16 | 0.0235 | 0.023571 | 14.614 | 0.131481 |
2 | 78 | 0.1350 | 0.135406 | 83.952 | 0.421963 |
3 | 212 | 0.3400 | 0.341023 | 211.434 | 0.001514 |
4 | 221 | 0.3400 | 0.341023 | 211.434 | 0.432771 |
5 | 81 | 0.1350 | 0.135406 | 83.952 | 0.103791 |
6 | 12 | 0.0235 | 0.023571 | 14.614 | 0.467513 |
Chi-Square Test
N | DF | Chi-Sq | P-Value |
620 | 5 | 1.55903 | 0.906 |
Therefore, the obtained Chi-square test statistics is 1.5590.
The obtained expected frequencies are:
Expected Frequencies |
14.614 |
83.952 |
211.434 |
211.434 |
83.952 |
14.614 |
Therefore, all expected frequencies are greater than 5.
The chi-square distribution will use in this study and the degrees of freedom is 5.
Conclusion:
(c)
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
The P-value of the sample statistic.
Answer to Problem 9P
Solution: The P-value of sample statistic is 0.906.
Explanation of Solution
Calculation: The Minitab output obtained in above part (b) also gives the P-value. So, the estimate P-valuefor the sample test statistic is 0.906.
(d)
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
Whether we reject or fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Answer to Problem 9P
Solution: We failed to reject the null hypothesis is at 1% level of significance.
Explanation of Solution
The obtained results in part (a), (b) and (c) are,
Since, the P-value(0.906) is less than 0.01, hence, we failed to reject the null hypothesis at
(e)
![Check Mark](/static/check-mark.png)
To explain: The conclusion in the context of application.
Answer to Problem 9P
Solution: We have insufficient evidence to conclude that the average daily July temperature does not follow a normal distribution at 1% level of significance.
Explanation of Solution
From above part, we failed to reject the null hypothesis of independence at
We have insufficient evidence to conclude that the average daily July temperature does not follow a normal distributionat 1% level of significance.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Understanding Basic Statistics
- What were the average sales for the four weeks prior to the experiment? What were the sales during the four weeks when the stores used the digital display? What is the mean difference in sales between the experimental and regular POP time periods? State the null hypothesis being tested by the paired sample t-test. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis? At a 95% significance level, was the difference significant? Explain why or why not using the results from the paired sample t-test. Should the manager of the retail chain install new digital displays in each store? Justify your answer.arrow_forwardA retail chain is interested in determining whether a digital video point-of-purchase (POP) display would stimulate higher sales for a brand advertised compared to the standard cardboard point-of-purchase display. To test this, a one-shot static group design experiment was conducted over a four-week period in 100 different stores. Fifty stores were randomly assigned to the control treatment (standard display) and the other 50 stores were randomly assigned to the experimental treatment (digital display). Compare the sales of the control group (standard POP) to the experimental group (digital POP). What were the average sales for the standard POP display (control group)? What were the sales for the digital display (experimental group)? What is the (mean) difference in sales between the experimental group and control group? List the null hypothesis being tested. Do you reject or retain the null hypothesis based on the results of the independent t-test? Was the difference between the…arrow_forwardQuestion 4 An article in Quality Progress (May 2011, pp. 42-48) describes the use of factorial experiments to improve a silver powder production process. This product is used in conductive pastes to manufacture a wide variety of products ranging from silicon wafers to elastic membrane switches. Powder density (g/cm²) and surface area (cm/g) are the two critical characteristics of this product. The experiments involved three factors: reaction temperature, ammonium percentage, stirring rate. Each of these factors had two levels, and the design was replicated twice. The design is shown in Table 3. A222222222222233 Stir Rate (RPM) Ammonium (%) Table 3: Silver Powder Experiment from Exercise 13.23 Temperature (°C) Density Surface Area 100 8 14.68 0.40 100 8 15.18 0.43 30 100 8 15.12 0.42 30 100 17.48 0.41 150 7.54 0.69 150 8 6.66 0.67 30 150 8 12.46 0.52 30 150 8 12.62 0.36 100 40 10.95 0.58 100 40 17.68 0.43 30 100 40 12.65 0.57 30 100 40 15.96 0.54 150 40 8.03 0.68 150 40 8.84 0.75 30 150…arrow_forward
- - + ++ Table 2: Crack Experiment for Exercise 2 A B C D Treatment Combination (1) Replicate I II 7.037 6.376 14.707 15.219 |++++ 1 བྱ॰༤༠སྦྱོ སྦྱོཋཏྟཱུ a b ab 11.635 12.089 17.273 17.815 с ас 10.403 10.151 4.368 4.098 bc abc 9.360 9.253 13.440 12.923 d 8.561 8.951 ad 16.867 17.052 bd 13.876 13.658 abd 19.824 19.639 cd 11.846 12.337 acd 6.125 5.904 bcd 11.190 10.935 abcd 15.653 15.053 Question 3 Continuation of Exercise 2. One of the variables in the experiment described in Exercise 2, heat treatment method (C), is a categorical variable. Assume that the remaining factors are continuous. (a) Write two regression models for predicting crack length, one for each level of the heat treatment method variable. What differences, if any, do you notice in these two equations? (b) Generate appropriate response surface contour plots for the two regression models in part (a). (c) What set of conditions would you recommend for the factors A, B, and D if you use heat treatment method C = +? (d) Repeat…arrow_forwardQuestion 2 A nickel-titanium alloy is used to make components for jet turbine aircraft engines. Cracking is a potentially serious problem in the final part because it can lead to nonrecoverable failure. A test is run at the parts producer to determine the effect of four factors on cracks. The four factors are: pouring temperature (A), titanium content (B), heat treatment method (C), amount of grain refiner used (D). Two replicates of a 24 design are run, and the length of crack (in mm x10-2) induced in a sample coupon subjected to a standard test is measured. The data are shown in Table 2. 1 (a) Estimate the factor effects. Which factor effects appear to be large? (b) Conduct an analysis of variance. Do any of the factors affect cracking? Use a = 0.05. (c) Write down a regression model that can be used to predict crack length as a function of the significant main effects and interactions you have identified in part (b). (d) Analyze the residuals from this experiment. (e) Is there an…arrow_forwardA 24-1 design has been used to investigate the effect of four factors on the resistivity of a silicon wafer. The data from this experiment are shown in Table 4. Table 4: Resistivity Experiment for Exercise 5 Run A B с D Resistivity 1 23 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 I+I+I+I+Oooo 0 0 ||++TI++o000 33.2 4.6 31.2 9.6 40.6 162.4 39.4 158.6 63.4 62.6 58.7 0 0 60.9 3 (a) Estimate the factor effects. Plot the effect estimates on a normal probability scale. (b) Identify a tentative model for this process. Fit the model and test for curvature. (c) Plot the residuals from the model in part (b) versus the predicted resistivity. Is there any indication on this plot of model inadequacy? (d) Construct a normal probability plot of the residuals. Is there any reason to doubt the validity of the normality assumption?arrow_forward
- Stem1: 1,4 Stem 2: 2,4,8 Stem3: 2,4 Stem4: 0,1,6,8 Stem5: 0,1,2,3,9 Stem 6: 2,2 What’s the Min,Q1, Med,Q3,Max?arrow_forwardAre the t-statistics here greater than 1.96? What do you conclude? colgPA= 1.39+0.412 hsGPA (.33) (0.094) Find the P valuearrow_forwardA poll before the elections showed that in a given sample 79% of people vote for candidate C. How many people should be interviewed so that the pollsters can be 99% sure that from 75% to 83% of the population will vote for candidate C? Round your answer to the whole number.arrow_forward
- Suppose a random sample of 459 married couples found that 307 had two or more personality preferences in common. In another random sample of 471 married couples, it was found that only 31 had no preferences in common. Let p1 be the population proportion of all married couples who have two or more personality preferences in common. Let p2 be the population proportion of all married couples who have no personality preferences in common. Find a95% confidence interval for . Round your answer to three decimal places.arrow_forwardA history teacher interviewed a random sample of 80 students about their preferences in learning activities outside of school and whether they are considering watching a historical movie at the cinema. 69 answered that they would like to go to the cinema. Let p represent the proportion of students who want to watch a historical movie. Determine the maximal margin of error. Use α = 0.05. Round your answer to three decimal places. arrow_forwardA random sample of medical files is used to estimate the proportion p of all people who have blood type B. If you have no preliminary estimate for p, how many medical files should you include in a random sample in order to be 99% sure that the point estimate will be within a distance of 0.07 from p? Round your answer to the next higher whole number.arrow_forward
- College Algebra (MindTap Course List)AlgebraISBN:9781305652231Author:R. David Gustafson, Jeff HughesPublisher:Cengage LearningGlencoe Algebra 1, Student Edition, 9780079039897...AlgebraISBN:9780079039897Author:CarterPublisher:McGraw Hill
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781305652231/9781305652231_smallCoverImage.gif)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9780079039897/9780079039897_smallCoverImage.jpg)
![Text book image](https://www.bartleby.com/isbn_cover_images/9781938168383/9781938168383_smallCoverImage.gif)