(a)
Case summary: The plaintiff (families of victims of flight explosion) brought a lawsuit against the defendants (person A, LAA and JSO) for violation of U.S. federal law.
To find:The law which can be utilized by the defendants. Exception to the law in case of state sponsored terrorism.
(b)
Case summary : The plaintiff (families of victims of flight explosion) brought a lawsuit against the defendants (person A, LAA and JSO) for violation of U.S. federal law. The defendants agreed to settle the dispute but the plaintiffs were excluded from the settlement and decided to carry on their respective suit.
To find: The validity of the motion by the defendant to dismiss the suit.
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionChapter 11 Solutions
Lms Integrated Mindtap Business Law, 1 Term (6 Months) Printed Access Card Cross/miller’s The Legal Environment Of Business: Text And Cases, 10th
- does having a compliance officer and compliance committee guarantee that an organization is protected from legal action if it violates laws and regulationsarrow_forwardKSR designs and manufactures auto parts and sells them to auto manufacturers (not consumers). KSR developed a pedal device for Ford vehicles and also received a patent on the pedal device. KSR also sold products to General Motors (GM), and, in order to make the pedal device compatible for GM cars, KSR added an electronic throttle control to the pedal device. Teleflex claimed to have a patent for the pedal device that could be connected to such a throttle and, therefore, sued KSR for patent infringement. KSR defended on the basis that the device produced for GM was simply a combination of two existing products and was not patentable.arrow_forwardThe National Safety Council estimates that one quarter of all automobile and truck accidents involve cell phone use or texting. In fatality and injury vehicle accidents, plaintiffs’ attorneys subpoena cell phone records, which often form the basis of compelling liability cases against driver-employees and their employers via vicarious liability. While balancing the privacy rights of the employee, with the business practice of the employer, is it appropriate to ban all cell phone usage while driving on company business. Please fully discuss. HINT: Address the Vicarious Liability & Privacy Rights Issues. Please use the IRAC format Issue: Call of the QuestionRule: Rule of Law to be applied to properly answer the questionAnalysis: Applying the rule of law to the facts of the problem presentedConclusion: Answer to the Issuearrow_forward
- Assume that adulterating Magentum is a strict liability crime and a tort. Which of the following will most likely occur? The government will bring charges against the businesses for the strict liability crime and individuals injured by drinking the adulterated Magentum will bring tort suits. The government will file assault and battery charges against the businesses. The government will bring criminal assault charges against the businesses, push for punitive damages, and sue the business owners for torts. Individuals will press charges against the businesses for attempted manslaughter.arrow_forwardMary purchased 6 bags of potatoes from Smart Shops. Unknown to either party, the potatoes had become unfit for human consumption due to a secondary growth. What rights does Mary have?arrow_forwardWill is an appraiser. He accepts compensation based on the value of the property he is appraising. In doing so, Will: violated FHA ethics standards violated USPAP ethics standards followed FHA ethics standards followed USPAP ethics standardsarrow_forward
- Listen This right is implied in the Constitution (9th and 14th Amendment) and is one all healthcare organizations and professionals must be aware of to avoid lawsuits and comply with HIPAA standards. fraud invasion of privacy negligence assault and batteryarrow_forward3. Buster operates Buster's Safe Waste, a company that transports toxic chemicals. Buster's company advertises itself as the safest toxic waste transport in the country. They take precautions are over and above all federal and state safety guidelines. In spite of these added safeguards, one of Buster's drivers is involved in an accident while transporting radioactive waste. Can Buster's Toxic Waste be held liable for injuries and harm caused by the radioactive material spilled in the accident?arrow_forwardUsing the IRAC model to answer the question. Jim and Jane got married last Sunday. The next day they travelled to Extended Stay Hotel in Miami for their honeymoon. They arrived at the Hotel, checked in and proceeded to their room. At the back of the front door in their room was a notice excluding liability, which read that “ Extended Stay will not be responsible for articles lost or stolen, unless it is logged at the front desk for safe custody.” However, this exclusion clause could only be seen after the door is closed as well as, the actual notice was small and colored in black, with a white background. Regrettably, with all the excitement of their honeymoon, both Jim and Jane did not even notice the exclusion clause at the back of the door. One day when they were out shopping, someone came into their room and stole Jim’s laptop.…arrow_forward
- Can you please help me answer this?arrow_forwardJimmyCorps places several Facebook ads claiming that his magic tonic protects consumers from coronavirus. Harvey places an order for 50 gallons of the magic tonic to protect himself and his family. Meanwhile, the New York Attorney General commences prosecution of JimmyCorps for fraud—his magic tonic is simply a gallon of bleach, and consumers who have purchased it have become gravely ill or died. Still, JimmyCorps sues Harvey when Harvey refuses to pay for the 50 gallons of tonic he ordered. Can a judge force Harvey to pay JimmyCorps? Why or why not? Note:- Do not provide handwritten solution. Maintain accuracy and quality in your answer. Take care of plagiarism. Answer completely. You will get up vote for sure.arrow_forwardPacific Southern Airlines (PSA) had an unhappy customer. Cynthia Mercier-Walters flew from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, to Phoenix, Arizona. The flight stopped briefly at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport, where she got off the plane for half an hour. When she returned to her seat, her $400 prescription reading glasses were gone. She asked the flight attendant where the glasses were, and the attendant said they probably were thrown away since the cleaning crew had come in with big bags and tossed everything in them. Ms. Mercier-Walters tried to locate the glasses through the airline’s lost-and-found service, but she failed. Then she wrote a strong letter to the airline demanding reimbursement for the loss. She felt that it was obvious that she was returning to her seat. The airline, however, knows that an overwhelming number of passengers arriving at hubs switch planes for their connecting flights. The airline does not know who is returning. What’s more, flight attendants…arrow_forward
- BUSN 11 Introduction to Business Student EditionBusinessISBN:9781337407137Author:KellyPublisher:Cengage LearningEssentials of Business Communication (MindTap Cou...BusinessISBN:9781337386494Author:Mary Ellen Guffey, Dana LoewyPublisher:Cengage LearningAccounting Information Systems (14th Edition)BusinessISBN:9780134474021Author:Marshall B. Romney, Paul J. SteinbartPublisher:PEARSON
- International Business: Competing in the Global M...BusinessISBN:9781259929441Author:Charles W. L. Hill Dr, G. Tomas M. HultPublisher:McGraw-Hill Education