Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Course List)
15th Edition
ISBN: 9781337395250
Author: Eugene F. Brigham, Joel F. Houston
Publisher: Cengage Learning
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 11, Problem 8P
a.
Summary Introduction
To calculate: The NPV and IRR of the given project with and without mitigation.
Introduction:
Capital Budgeting:
It refers to the long-term investment decisions that has been taken by the top management of a company and that are irreversible in nature. These decisions require investment of large amount of cash of the company.
It is a method under capital budgeting which includes the calculation of net present value of the project in which company is investing. The calculation is done by calculating the difference between the value of
It refers to the rate of return that is computed by the company to make a decision regarding the selection of a project for investment. This rate provides the basis for selection of projects with lower cost of capital and rejection of project with higher cost of capital.
b.
Summary Introduction
To identify: The way in which the environmental effects should be dealt with when this project is evaluated
c.
Summary Introduction
To explain: Whether the project should be undertaken or not with or without mitigation.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental Problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would cost $66 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $22 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $23 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 13%.
Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55.NPV $ millionIRR %
Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Round your answers to two decimal places. Do not round your intermediate calculations.…
Please show the solution on excel spreadsheet and please indicate the formulas used. Thank you.
A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 15%.
How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluated?
The environmental effects if not mitigated could result in additional loss of cash flows and/or fines and penalties due to ill will among customers, community, etc. Therefore, even though the mine is legal without mitigation, the company needs to make sure that they have anticipated all costs in the "no mitigation" analysis from not…
Chapter 11 Solutions
Fundamentals of Financial Management (MindTap Course List)
Ch. 11 - How are project classifications used in the...Ch. 11 - Prob. 2QCh. 11 - Why is the NFV of a relatively long-term project...Ch. 11 - Prob. 4QCh. 11 - If two mutually exclusive projects were being...Ch. 11 - Discuss the following statement: If a firm has...Ch. 11 - Why might it be rational for a small firm that...Ch. 11 - Project X is very risky and has an NPV of 3...Ch. 11 - Prob. 9QCh. 11 - A firm has a 100 million capital budget. It is...
Ch. 11 - NPV Project L costs 65,000, its expected cash...Ch. 11 - IRR Refer to problem 11-1. What is the projects...Ch. 11 - MIRR Refer to problem 11-1. What is the projects...Ch. 11 - Prob. 4PCh. 11 - DISCOUNTED PAYBACK Refer to problem 11-1. What is...Ch. 11 - NPV Your division is considering two projects with...Ch. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA A firm with a 14% WACC...Ch. 11 - Prob. 8PCh. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS...Ch. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE...Ch. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA: MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE...Ch. 11 - Prob. 12PCh. 11 - MIRR A firm is considering two mutually exclusive...Ch. 11 - CHOOSING MANDATORY PROJECTS ON THE BASIS OF LEAST...Ch. 11 - NPV PROFILES: TIMING DIFFERENCES An oil-drilling...Ch. 11 - Prob. 16PCh. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA A company has an 11%...Ch. 11 - NPV AND IRR A store has 5 years remaining on its...Ch. 11 - Prob. 19PCh. 11 - NPV A project has annual cash flows of 5,000 for...Ch. 11 - Prob. 21PCh. 11 - MIRR A project has the following cash flows: This...Ch. 11 - CAPITAL BUDGETING CRITERIA Your division is...Ch. 11 - BASICS OF CAPITAL BUDGETING You recently went to...
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The management of Ryland International Is considering Investing in a new facility and the following cash flows are expected to result from the investment: A. What Is the payback period of this uneven cash flow? B. Does your answer change if year 6s cash inflow changes to $920,000?arrow_forwardRoberts Company is considering an investment in equipment that is capable of producing more efficiently than the current technology. The outlay required is 2,293,200. The equipment is expected to last five years and will have no salvage value. The expected cash flows associated with the project are as follows: Required: 1. Compute the projects payback period. 2. Compute the projects accounting rate of return. 3. Compute the projects net present value, assuming a required rate of return of 10 percent. 4. Compute the projects internal rate of return.arrow_forwardA mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 15%. Should this project be undertaken? 1. The project should not be undertaken under the "no mitigation" assumption. 2. The project should be undertaken only under the " no mitigation" assumption. 3. The project should not be undertaken under the "mitigation" assumption. 4. Even when mitigation is considered the project has a positive NPV, so it should be undertaken. 5. Even when mitigation is considered the project has a…arrow_forward
- A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $10 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $60 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $20 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $21 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 15%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ ____ million IRR: ___________ % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as…arrow_forwardA mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 11%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ million IRR: % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not…arrow_forwardA mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate…arrow_forward
- A mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does Invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 10%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round Intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: % million Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round…arrow_forwardA mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $9.66 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $57 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $19 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $20 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ IRR: % million Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round…arrow_forwardA mining company is considering a new project. Because the mine has received a permit, the project would be legal; but it would cause significant harm to a nearby river. The firm could spend an additional $11 million at Year 0 to mitigate the environmental problem, but it would not be required to do so. Developing the mine (without mitigation) would require an initial outlay of $69 million, and the expected cash inflows would be $23 million per year for 5 years. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual inflows would be $24 million. The risk-adjusted WACC is 12%. a. Calculate the NPV and IRR with mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answers to two decimal places. NPV: $ million IRR: % Calculate the NPV and IRR without mitigation. Enter your answer for NPV in millions. For example, an answer of $10,550,000 should be entered as 10.55. Do not round…arrow_forward
- i want step by step answerarrow_forwardA construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calulate the Payback with and without mitgationwhat is the discounted payback with and without mitigation?Should the project be undertaken? If so, should the firm do mitigation? (hint: discuss all the criterias you have calculated in earlier parts)How should the environmental effects be dealt with when this project is evaluatedarrow_forwardA construction company is deciding to undertake a project. The project is quite profitable as it will generate net cash inflows of $20 million per year for 5 years. However, it will cause pollution to the nearby residents. The company can mitigate this pollution by investing additional 10 million at Year 0 but legally it is not compulsory for it to do so. Undertaking this project would cost $60 million without mitigation. If the firm does invest in mitigation, the annual cash inflows would be $22 million. The risk adjusted WACC is 12%. Calculate the NPV with and without mitigation. Show the workingsarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENTFinanceISBN:9781337514835Author:MOYERPublisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...AccountingISBN:9781305970663Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. MowenPublisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...FinanceISBN:9781337395083Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. DavesPublisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 2AccountingISBN:9781947172609Author:OpenStaxPublisher:OpenStax College
EBK CONTEMPORARY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
Finance
ISBN:9781337514835
Author:MOYER
Publisher:CENGAGE LEARNING - CONSIGNMENT
Cornerstones of Cost Management (Cornerstones Ser...
Accounting
ISBN:9781305970663
Author:Don R. Hansen, Maryanne M. Mowen
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Intermediate Financial Management (MindTap Course...
Finance
ISBN:9781337395083
Author:Eugene F. Brigham, Phillip R. Daves
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Principles of Accounting Volume 2
Accounting
ISBN:9781947172609
Author:OpenStax
Publisher:OpenStax College