Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies and Tactics (MindTap Course List)
14th Edition
ISBN: 9781305506381
Author: James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher: Cengage Learning
Question
Book Icon
Chapter 11, Problem 7E

a)

To determine

To Evaluate: The effect of the price cut on the (i) total revenue (ii) Contribution margin of model A based on this analysis, should the firm lower the price of model A.

a)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 7E

  1. Total Revenue: Increase in the total revenue by $77,715 has been detected due to fall in price.
  2. Contribution model of Model A: The contribution margin has increased by $9,540

Explanation of Solution

Given:

The following table has current information on the sales, profitability, and costs of the three models:

    MODELAVERAGE QUANTITY SOLD(UNITS/MONTH)CURRENT PRICETOTAL REVENUEVARIABLE COST PER UNITCONTRIBUTION MARGIN PER UNITCONTRIBUTION MARGIN
    A15,000$30$450,000$15.00$15$225,000
    B5,00035175,00018.001785,000
    C10,00045450,00020.0025250,000
    Total$1,075,000$560,000

Lowering the price of Model A to $27

Elasticity of demand to be 2.5

Explain:

The price elasticity of demand (ED) measures the responsiveness of change in quantity demanded to change in price.

The arc price elasticity of demand measures the price elasticity between two prices of the good. It is calculated as

  ED=Q2Q1( Q 1 + Q 2 )/2P2P1( P 1 + P 2 )/2 .......(1)

  =Q2Q1Q1+Q2×P1+P2P2P1

The arc price elasticity of demand for model A of tennis rackets is ED=2.5

For the quantity demanded QA1=15,0000 , the price is PA1=$30 .The Company is considering to lower the price to PA2=$27 .

Substitute appropriate values in (1) and rearrange to find Q2 .

(Prices of other models are constant)

  2.5=QA215,00015,000+QA2×30+272730

  2.5=QA215,00015,000+QA2×573

  2.5(15,000+QA2)=19(QA215,000)

  2.5QA237,500=19QA2+285,000

  2.5QA2+19QA2=285,000+37,500

  16.5QA2=322,500

  QA2=19,545

(i) Total Revenue (TR) is the total receipt of the company from the sales of tennis rackets.

The change in the total revenue is calculated as

  ΔTRA=TRA2TRA1

  =PA2QA2PA1QA1

  =($27)(19,545)($30)(15,000)

  =$77,715

There has been an increase in the total revenue by $77,715 due to fall in price.

(ii) Contribution margin per unit(C) is the difference between the price per unit and variable cost per unit.

The new contribution margin per unit is calculated as

  CA2=PA2V

  =$27$15

  =$12

Contribution margin is the marginal profit per unit sale. It is calculated as

Contribution Margin (A) =CA2QA2

  =($12)(19,545)

  =$234,540

The contribution margin with P=$30 was $225,000 .The new contribution margin is $234,540 .

Thus, the change is

  Δ in contribution margin(A) =$234,540$225,000

  =$9,540

The contribution margin has increased by $9,540.

The change in the contribution margin is positive. Thus, lowering the price appears to be worthwhile.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: Total Revenue refers to the total receipts a vendor can yield from the selling goods and services to the buyers. Cost received by sellers from buyers by the selling number of goods is known as Total revenue.

b)

To determine

To Evaluate: The effect of the price cut on the (i) total revenue (ii) Contribution margin for the entire line of tennis rackets. Through this analysis, should the firm lower the price of model A.

b)

Expert Solution
Check Mark

Answer to Problem 7E

  1. Total Revenue: There has been an effect in the total revenue of the entire line of tennis rackets by $59,395 due to fall in price of model A.
  2. Contribution margin of Model A: There has been a decline in contribution margin by the entire line of tennis rackets by $12 due to fall in price of model A.The total change in the contribution margin is negative. Thus, lowering the price of model A should not take place.

Explanation of Solution

Given:

The following table contains recent information on the sales, costs, and profitability of the three models:

    MODELAVERAGE QUANTITY SOLD(UNITS/MONTH)CURRENT PRICETOTAL REVENUEVARIABLE COST PER UNITCONTRIBUTION MARGIN PER UNITCONTRIBUTION MARGIN
    A15,000$30$450,000$15.00$15$225,000
    B5,00035175,00018.001785,000
    C10,00045450,00020.0025250,000
    Total$1,075,000$560,000

Lowering the price of Model A to $27

Elasticity of demand to be 2.5

Explain:

The arc-cross price elasticity of demand measures the cross price elasticity between two prices of the related good. It is calculated as

  EAB=Q B2Q B1( Q B1 + Q B2 )/2P A2P A1( P A1 + P A2 )/2 .......(2)

  =QB2QB1QB1+QB2×PA2PA1PA1+PA2

The arc cross- price elasticity of demand between model A and model B of tennis rackets is EAB=0.5

The original and new price of model A rackets are PA1=$30 and PA2=$27 , respectively.

The original sales of model B are QB1=5,000

Substitute appropriate values in (2)

  0.5=QB25,0005,000+QB2×30+272730

  0.5=QB25,0005,000+QB2×573

  0.5(5,000+QB2)=19(QB25,000)

  2,500+0.5QB2=19QA2+95,000

  0.5QA2+19QB2=95,0002,500

  19.5QB2=92,500

  QB2=4,744

The arc cross-price elasticity of demand between model A and model C of tennis rackets is EAC=0.2 .

The original and new price of model A rackets are PA1=$30 and PA2=$27 , respectively.

The original sales of model C are QC1=10,000

Substitute appropriate values in (2)

  0.2=QC210,00010,000+QC2×30+272730

  0.2=QC210,00010,000+QC2×573

  0.2(10,000+QC2)=19(QC210,000)

  2,000+0.2QC2=19QC2+190,000

  0.2QC2+19QC2=190,0002,000

  19.2QC2=188,000

  QC2=9,792

The change in the total revenue is calculated as

  ΔTRC=TRC2TRC1

  =PC1QC2PC1QC1

  =($45)(10,000)($45)(9,792)

  =$9,360

The change in the total revenue of the entire line of tennis rackets is

  ΔTR=ΔTRA+ΔTRB+ΔTRC

  =$77,715+($8,960)+($9,360)

  =$59,395

There has been an increase in the total revenue of the entire line of tennis rackets by $59,395 due to fall in price of model A.

Contribution margin for model B is

Contribution margin (B) =CBQB2

  =($17)(4,744)

  =$80,648

The contribution margin with QB1=5,000 was $85,000 .The new contribution margin is $80,648. Thus, the change is

  Δ in contribution margin(B)=$80,648$85,000

  =$4,352

Contribution margin for model C is

  Contribution margin(C)=CCQC2

  =($25)(9,792)

  =$244,800

The contribution margin with QC1=10,000 was $250,000. The new contribution margin with $244, 800.Thus, the change is

  Δ in contribution margin(C) =$244,800$250,000

  =$5,200

The change in the contribution margin by the entire line of tennis rackets is

  Δ in contribution margin(Total) =$9,540+($4,352)+($5,200)

  =$12

There has been a decline in contribution margin by the entire line of tennis rackets by $12 due to fall in price of model A.

Economics Concept Introduction

Introduction: Contribution Margin refers to the difference with the trading price and variable cost. It is the measurement of the ability of the company to enclose the variable cost with revenue. Contribution margin includes fixed costs and profit it is the amount that contributes to the payment for making a profit.

Want to see more full solutions like this?

Subscribe now to access step-by-step solutions to millions of textbook problems written by subject matter experts!
Students have asked these similar questions
General Accounting Question solution and give me Blank ? C
It is possible to use transformational leadership strategies to reach unethical objectives.  Traditional leadership theories and morals standards are not adequate to help employees solve complex organizational issues. For the statement above, argue in position for both in favor or opposed to the statements.
Discuss the preferred deterrent method employed by the Zambian government to combat tax evasion, monetary fines. As noted in the reading the potential penalty for corporate tax evasion is a fine of 52.5% of the amount evaded plus interest assessed at 5% annually along with a possibility of jail time. In general, monetary fines as a deterrent are preferred to blacklisting of company directors, revoking business operation licenses, or calling for prison sentences. Do you agree with this preference? Should companies that are guilty of tax evasion face something more severe than a monetary fine? Something less severe? Should the fine and interest amount be set at a different rate? If so at why? Provide support and rationale for your responses.
Knowledge Booster
Background pattern image
Similar questions
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
Recommended textbooks for you
Text book image
Managerial Economics: Applications, Strategies an...
Economics
ISBN:9781305506381
Author:James R. McGuigan, R. Charles Moyer, Frederick H.deB. Harris
Publisher:Cengage Learning
Text book image
Micro Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613064
Author:Tucker, Irvin B.
Publisher:Cengage,
Text book image
Economics For Today
Economics
ISBN:9781337613040
Author:Tucker
Publisher:Cengage Learning