EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
10th Edition
ISBN: 9781337516051
Author: Miller
Publisher: YUZU
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 11, Problem 4CT
Summary Introduction
Case summary:The person B and the other residents of the country A filed a case in the federal district court in California alleging that the company MB, a subsidiary of D, joined hands with the state security forces to kidnap, torture, and murder the plaintiff and their relatives. The district court dismissed the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. The ruling was reversed by the Ninth Circuit. The company D appealed.
To find:The effect on a U.S. citizen on the adoption of the plaintiff's argument by the court.
Expert Solution & Answer
Trending nowThis is a popular solution!
Students have asked these similar questions
What is the role of international law in shaping domestic law, and how do national courts balance conflicting international and domestic legal obligations?
sanjay
One of the most important socio-economic and political decision the government of
South Africa has ever made and prides itself in, particularly for the needy, is the
commitment it took towards ensuring their social welfare by its introduction of social
insurance and social assistance. The social security structure in South Africa has a
Constitutional law basis. Section 27(1)(c) of the Constitution grants everyone the right
to have access to social security, including, if one is unable to support himself or
herself, and dependants. However, this social security system is not without
challenges.
ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS:
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
Discuss the major shortcomings of the South African social security system.
List three social security measures linked to employment relationship and
three of those not linked to employment relationship.
Distinguish between social assistance and social insurance
Chapter 11 Solutions
EBK THE LEGAL ENVIRONMENT OF BUSINESS:
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- The United States has slapped a 25 per cent tariff on Australian manufactured steel entering the United States. The US Government claims they are simply implementing their rights according to certain sections of the US Trade Act of 1974. This move to potentially impact on Australian jobs as steel manufacturing is one of the country’s biggest employer and the US is Australia’s second biggest market next to China. As a prominent international legal expert, you have been appointed by the Australian Government to provide legal advice on this matter. Required: What would your legal advicecover and why? Note - Students should discuss their response in relation to the General Agreements on Tariff and Trade (GATT) and World Trade Organisation (WTO) rules on legal disputes of international trade of goods.arrow_forwardWhat is the purpose of the Industrial Dispute Tribunal as it operates in Jamaica?arrow_forwardDiscuss the differences between International Administrative Law and International Law? Are they the same? If no, in case of conflict which will prevail?arrow_forward
- Discuss how do multinational corporations demonstrate social responsibility in a foreign country?arrow_forwardPreparation Corporate social responsibility (CSR, also called corporate conscience, corporate citizenship, or responsible business) is a form of corporate self-regulation integrated into a business model. CSR policy functions as a self-regulatory mechanism whereby a business monitors and ensures its active compliance with the spirit of the law, ethical standards, and national or international norms. With some models, a firm's implementation of CSR goes beyond compliance and engages in "actions that appeár to further some social good, beyond the interests of the firm and that which is required by law." The aim is to increase long- term profits and shareholder trust through positive public relations and high ethical standards to reduce business and legal risk by taking responsibility for corporate actions. CSR strategies encourage the company to make a positive impact on the environment and stakeholders including consumers, employees, investors, communities, and others. Every year,…arrow_forwardLast year, eHarbour signed a contract with the United States Olympic Committee and US Sailing, the National Governing Body for the sport of sailing, to sponsor the US Sailing team in the upcoming Olympics. The marketing team hoped that sponsoring sailing at the Olympics would be good publicity to promote eHarbour software. Unfortunately, the venue for the Olympic Games had to be moved to a country that is now known for multiple human rights violations, including treatment of women and certain ethnic groups. There is now a lot of bad publicity with the upcoming Olympics. There have been articles appearing in newspapers and magazines demanding that corporate sponsors pull out from the upcoming Olympics. Some members of Congress have called for sponsors to withdraw sponsorship of the Olympics. Discuss whether eHarbour can withdraw sponsorship from the Olympics without violating its existing contract with the United States Olympic Committee and US Sailing. What defenses could eHarbour…arrow_forward
- Is the broad reach of U.S. antitrust law justified on the basis that foreign conduct harms U.S. consumers, or has the "domestic injury" exception to the FTAIA been pushed too far? Regardless of your view, what amendments would you suggest to the FTAIA to improve clarity and reduce the high cost of multinational litigation?arrow_forwardGiven the principles noted in the case, how can companies comment on their positive actions to promote human rights so that consumers will think well of them? Would you propose that a company (a) do nothing, (b) construct a corporate code of ethics, or (c) align itself with some of the universal covenants or compacts prepared by international agencies?arrow_forwardOutline and describe obligations of a vatable person in developing countries.arrow_forward
- IDENTIFY A COUNTRY OUTSIDE GHANA AND INDICATE THE SYSTEM OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE LEGAL SYSTEM PRACTISED RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL AS PRACTICED BY MOST FIRMS IN THE COUNTRYarrow_forwardNigeria, an African nation, while in the midst of a boom period due to oil exports, entered into $1 billion of contracts with companies in various countries to purchase huge quantities of Portland cement. Nigeria was going to use the cement to build and improve the country’s infrastructure. Several of the contracts were with American companies, including Texas Trading & Milling Corporation (Texas Trading). Nigeria substantially overbought cement, and the country’s docks and harbors became clogged with ships waiting to unload. Unable to accept delivery of the cement it had bought, Nigeria repudiated many of its contracts, including the one with Texas Trading. When Texas Trading sued Nigeria in U.S. District Court to recover damages for breach of contract, Nigeria asserted in defense that the doctrine of sovereign immunity protected it from liability. a) What does the commercial activity exception to the doctrine of sovereign immunity provide? b) Did Nigeria act ethically in…arrow_forwardwhat does business ethics mean and compares ethics in professions and ethics in business, establishing its importance for each of the partiesarrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
