a)
To determine: Material cost and percentage change in material cost using supply chain strategy for a profit of $25,000 in Company KF.
Introduction:
a)
Answer to Problem 3P
Using supply chain strategy 5.71% decrease in material cost is required to yield profit of $25,000.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Particulars | Amount | Percentage |
Sales | $250,000 | 100% |
Cost of supply chain purchases | $175,000 | 70% |
Production cost | $30,000 | 12% |
Fixed cost | $30,000 | 12% |
Profit | $15,000 | 6% |
Supply chain strategy:
Supply chain strategy | Amount | Percentage increase or decrease |
Sales | $250,000 | |
Material cost | $165,000 | -5.71 |
Production cost | $30,000 | 12% |
Fixed cost | $30,000 | 12% |
Profit | $25,000 | 66.67% |
Calculation of percentage changes using supply chain strategy:
Company KF is expected to increase its profit from $15,000 to $25,000.
Percentage of material cost for profit of $25,000:
For an expected profit for $25,000 from $10,000, the estimated percentage of material cost is 66%.
Material cost for an expected profit $25,000:
Percentage change in material cost for an expected profit $25,000:
The material cost decreased by 5.71%.
Change in profit percentage:
The percentage change in profit, when profit rises from $15,000 to $25,000 is 66.67%.
Hence, by using supply chain strategy 5.71% decrease in material cost is required to yield profit of $25,000.
b)
To determine: Sales and percentage change in sales using sales strategy for a profit of $25,000 in Company KF.
b)
Answer to Problem 3P
By using sales strategy 22.22% increase in sales is required to yield profit of $25,000.
Explanation of Solution
Given information:
Particulars | Amount | Percentage |
Sales | $250,000 | 100% |
Cost of supply chain purchases | $175,000 | 70% |
Production cost | $30,000 | 12% |
Fixed cost | $30,000 | 12% |
Profit | $15,000 | 6% |
Sales Strategy:
Sales strategy | Amount | Percentage increase or decrease |
Sales | $175,000 | 75% |
Material cost | $105,000 (70%) | 75% |
Production cost | $35,000(12%) | 75% |
Fixed cost | $10,000 | 0% |
Profit | $25,000 | 150% |
Calculation of percentage changes using sales strategy:
Calculate the percentage increase in the sales:
Hence, the sales increase to $305,555 when profit is $25,000.
Change in material cost:
For an estimated profit of $25,000, the sales changes to $305,555 and hence due to change in sales there is also change in material cost. Material cost is 70% of sales. Therefore for sales of $305,555, the material cost is $213,889.
Percentage change in material cost:
The percentage change in material cost is 22.22% when the sales increase to $305,555.
Change in production cost:
For an estimated profit of $25,000, the sales changes to $305,555 and hence due to change in sales there is also change in production cost. Production cost is 12% of sales. Therefore for sales of $305,555, the production cost is $36,666.
Percentage change in production cost:
The percentage change in production cost is 22.22% when the sales increase to $305,555.
Change in sales percentage:
The percentage change in sales, when profit rises from $15,000 to $25,000 is 22.22%.
Hence, by using sales strategy 22.22% increase in sales is required to yield profit of $25,000.
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Pearson eText Principles of Operations Management: Sustainability and Supply Chain Management -- Instant Access (Pearson+)
- Scenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What should Sharon do in this situation?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. What does the Institute of Supply Management code of ethics say about financial conflicts of interest?arrow_forwardScenario 4 Sharon Gillespie, a new buyer at Visionex, Inc., was reviewing quotations for a tooling contract submitted by four suppliers. She was evaluating the quotes based on price, target quality levels, and delivery lead time promises. As she was working, her manager, Dave Cox, entered her office. He asked how everything was progressing and if she needed any help. She mentioned she was reviewing quotations from suppliers for a tooling contract. Dave asked who the interested suppliers were and if she had made a decision. Sharon indicated that one supplier, Apex, appeared to fit exactly the requirements Visionex had specified in the proposal. Dave told her to keep up the good work. Later that day Dave again visited Sharons office. He stated that he had done some research on the suppliers and felt that another supplier, Micron, appeared to have the best track record with Visionex. He pointed out that Sharons first choice was a new supplier to Visionex and there was some risk involved with that choice. Dave indicated that it would please him greatly if she selected Micron for the contract. The next day Sharon was having lunch with another buyer, Mark Smith. She mentioned the conversation with Dave and said she honestly felt that Apex was the best choice. When Mark asked Sharon who Dave preferred, she answered, Micron. At that point Mark rolled his eyes and shook his head. Sharon asked what the body language was all about. Mark replied, Look, I know youre new but you should know this. I heard last week that Daves brother-in-law is a new part owner of Micron. I was wondering how soon it would be before he started steering business to that company. He is not the straightest character. Sharon was shocked. After a few moments, she announced that her original choice was still the best selection. At that point Mark reminded Sharon that she was replacing a terminated buyer who did not go along with one of Daves previous preferred suppliers. Ethical decisions that affect a buyers ethical perspective usually involve the organizational environment, cultural environment, personal environment, and industry environment. Analyze this scenario using these four variables.arrow_forward
- Scenario 3 Ben Gibson, the purchasing manager at Coastal Products, was reviewing purchasing expenditures for packaging materials with Jeff Joyner. Ben was particularly disturbed about the amount spent on corrugated boxes purchased from Southeastern Corrugated. Ben said, I dont like the salesman from that company. He comes around here acting like he owns the place. He loves to tell us about his fancy car, house, and vacations. It seems to me he must be making too much money off of us! Jeff responded that he heard Southeastern Corrugated was going to ask for a price increase to cover the rising costs of raw material paper stock. Jeff further stated that Southeastern would probably ask for more than what was justified simply from rising paper stock costs. After the meeting, Ben decided he had heard enough. After all, he prided himself on being a results-oriented manager. There was no way he was going to allow that salesman to keep taking advantage of Coastal Products. Ben called Jeff and told him it was time to rebid the corrugated contract before Southeastern came in with a price increase request. Who did Jeff know that might be interested in the business? Jeff replied he had several companies in mind to include in the bidding process. These companies would surely come in at a lower price, partly because they used lower-grade boxes that would probably work well enough in Coastal Products process. Jeff also explained that these suppliers were not serious contenders for the business. Their purpose was to create competition with the bids. Ben told Jeff to make sure that Southeastern was well aware that these new suppliers were bidding on the contract. He also said to make sure the suppliers knew that price was going to be the determining factor in this quote, because he considered corrugated boxes to be a standard industry item. Is Ben Gibson acting legally? Is he acting ethically? Why or why not?arrow_forwardScenario 3 Ben Gibson, the purchasing manager at Coastal Products, was reviewing purchasing expenditures for packaging materials with Jeff Joyner. Ben was particularly disturbed about the amount spent on corrugated boxes purchased from Southeastern Corrugated. Ben said, I dont like the salesman from that company. He comes around here acting like he owns the place. He loves to tell us about his fancy car, house, and vacations. It seems to me he must be making too much money off of us! Jeff responded that he heard Southeastern Corrugated was going to ask for a price increase to cover the rising costs of raw material paper stock. Jeff further stated that Southeastern would probably ask for more than what was justified simply from rising paper stock costs. After the meeting, Ben decided he had heard enough. After all, he prided himself on being a results-oriented manager. There was no way he was going to allow that salesman to keep taking advantage of Coastal Products. Ben called Jeff and told him it was time to rebid the corrugated contract before Southeastern came in with a price increase request. Who did Jeff know that might be interested in the business? Jeff replied he had several companies in mind to include in the bidding process. These companies would surely come in at a lower price, partly because they used lower-grade boxes that would probably work well enough in Coastal Products process. Jeff also explained that these suppliers were not serious contenders for the business. Their purpose was to create competition with the bids. Ben told Jeff to make sure that Southeastern was well aware that these new suppliers were bidding on the contract. He also said to make sure the suppliers knew that price was going to be the determining factor in this quote, because he considered corrugated boxes to be a standard industry item. As the Marketing Manager for Southeastern Corrugated, what would you do upon receiving the request for quotation from Coastal Products?arrow_forwardValue Chain; Sustainability One way the value chain can be helpful is to provide a basis for acompany to determine the full cost of its product or service over the entire value chain. Often companies tend to focus only on manufacturing costs and ignore the upstream (design, testing, etc.) anddownstream (marketing, distribution, etc.) costs of the product or service. Full value-chain analysisof this type is useful to the consumer as well as the manufacturer. For example, a product might beinexpensive to buy, but the operating costs may be higher than expected. Consider for example thecase of a company, CleanTech, which provides a cleaning service to owners of large storage tanksthat often contain hazardous liquids such as fuel oil or toxic chemicals. CleanTech is considering thepurchase of a new system for cleaning tanks that is somewhat more expensive than its current equipment, but one which could reduce both operating costs and the amount of environmentally harmfulwaste product that…arrow_forward
- Two items are omitted from each of the following three lists of cost of goods sold data from a manufacturing company income statement. Determine the amounts of the missing items, identifying them by letter. Finished goods Inventory,June1 $61,600 $46,200 (e) Cost of goods manufactured 329,000 (c ) 484,800 Cost of finished goods available for sales (a) $260,400 $540,000 Finished goods Inventory ,June30 72,800 61,600 (f) Cost of goods sold (b) (d) $513,600arrow_forwardA Case study is attached in image and has only one question regarding the case study please check it and answer. Answer must be around 450 to 500 words, Thank you!arrow_forwardAs a Program Manager, you have been asked to evaluate a furniture manufacturer’s cash to cash conversion cycle under the following assumptions: sales of $23.5 million, cost of goods sold of 420.8 million, 50 operating weeks a year, total average on hand inventory of $2,150,000, accounts receivable equal to $2,455,000, and accounts payable of $3,695,000. What do you conclude? What recommendations can you make to improve performance? What would be the impact of reducing the accounts payable from $3,695,000to $2,000,000 and all other data remained the same? Please show in detail these impacts quantitatively in your answers.arrow_forward
- Q The owner of a small manufacturing business has patented a new device for washing dishes. Before trying to commercialize the device and add it to the existing line of products, the entrepreneur wants reasonable assurance of success. Variable costs are estimated at Rs. 50 per unit produced and sold. Fixed costs are Rs. 4,00,000 per year. A) If selling price is set at Rs. 250, how many units must be produced and sold to break-even? B) Forecasted sales for the first year are 4500 units, if price is reduced to Rs. 150. With this pricing strategy, what would be the product’s profit?arrow_forwardpart barrow_forwardplease answer both the questions within 30 minutes. make sure both the questions are answered else i will give negative ratings.arrow_forward
- MarketingMarketingISBN:9780357033791Author:Pride, William MPublisher:South Western Educational PublishingPurchasing and Supply Chain ManagementOperations ManagementISBN:9781285869681Author:Robert M. Monczka, Robert B. Handfield, Larry C. Giunipero, James L. PattersonPublisher:Cengage Learning