(a)
Show that if
(a)
Answer to Problem 11.23P
It is showed that if
Explanation of Solution
Write the expression for the Schrodinger equation using the given equation 11.108.
Write the expression for the Hamiltonian.
Use equation (II) in (I) and it can be written as
If the
So if equation 11.108 is a solution to the Schrodinger equation if
Conclusion:
Therefore, it is showed that if
(b)
Check the correct solution in the general case
(b)
Answer to Problem 11.23P
It is showed the correct solution in the general case
Explanation of Solution
Take the derivation of equation 11.109 and recalling that,
In all this case
Compare the equation (VI) with 11.109 and it can be written as
Conclusion:
Therefore, it is showed the correct solution in the general case
(c)
Show that
(c)
Answer to Problem 11.23P
It is showed that
Explanation of Solution
Write the expression for
Replace the variables with
Use equation (IX) and write the expression to generalize to higher power of
Conclusion:
Therefore, it is showed that
Want to see more full solutions like this?
Chapter 11 Solutions
Introduction To Quantum Mechanics
- Determine whether the function given by the table is linear, exponential, or neither. If the function is linear, find a linear function that models the data, if it is exponential, find an exponential function that models the data. f(x) -1 10 1 10 100 3 1000 O A. The function is linear A linear function that models the data is f(x)%=D (Simplify your answer.) O B. The function is exponential. An exponential function that models the data is f(x) =. (Simplify your answer.) O C. The function is neither linear nor exponential. Click to select and enter your answer(s). Reflect in ePortfolioarrow_forwardConsider the function: Z = where x = 13.36 ± 0.03 and, y = 6.27 ± 0.05 are two independent measured quantities, 1 PHY1509 PHYSICS SECTION each with its own error. Calculate the value of z and the standard error Az.arrow_forwardI need the answer as soon as possiblearrow_forward
- Use the tools for manipulating partial derivatives to prove the following relationsarrow_forwardI want the solution by hand pleasearrow_forwardLet X be a random variable whose density is given by the formulaf(x) = cx2 if x ∈ (0, 2) 0 if otherwise.(a) Find c.(b) Let Y be the integer part of X, i.e., Y = 0 if 0 ≤ X < 1 and Y = 1 if 1 ≤ X < 2. Let Z be the fractional part of X, i.e., Z = X −Y . Find the correlation between Y and Z.arrow_forward
- Fr³t? Find the simplest SI unit of z, if Z = m³v²arrow_forwardThe diagram below shows an infinitely long straight wire with a current I that is directed in the +x direction. The ultimate goal of this problem is to use the Biot Savart Law to derive the magnetic field by the wire at point P which is a distance d from the wire. P +y I ds, 1 dB 1₂ - [H-1² 4T +z ds 2 The Biot Savart Law gives an expression of the magnetic field by a infinitesimal segment of the wire. Hods x f p2 +x Notice that the direction of the field corresponding to a current segment (dB) is given by the direction of the cross product ds x î.arrow_forwardThis is the graph of function f. 2 1 -2 Y 1 2 34 X What is the graph of its derivative, f'?arrow_forward
- 2. Please answer the question completely and accurately with full detailed steps.arrow_forwardLet n 1 be an integer, let to to is given by a stationary path of the Lagrangian functional C: L[x] = 1 dt L(t,x,x), x(0) =x0, x(t)=X1, where LT - V and T is the total kinetic energy T = n 1 k=1 2 mark. Using the above first-integral, show that, if V is independent of t, the total energy E=T+V of the particle is a constant of the motion.arrow_forwardUsing the relation V = I R, you want to find the largest source of uncertainty in calculating V and know that the uncertainty on I is 0.5mA and the uncertainty on R is 3Ohms. It must be true that R is the larger source of uncertainty because it is a larger value. true or falsearrow_forward
- Classical Dynamics of Particles and SystemsPhysicsISBN:9780534408961Author:Stephen T. Thornton, Jerry B. MarionPublisher:Cengage Learning