Microeconomics
11th Edition
ISBN: 9781260507041
Author: Colander, David
Publisher: MCGRAW-HILL HIGHER EDUCATION
expand_more
expand_more
format_list_bulleted
Question
Chapter 10, Problem 6IP
(a)
To determine
Overseas profit scope of the US producers.
(b)
To determine
Suggestion to the government regarding this tax system.
(c)
To determine
Reasons why the government keeps this tax system.
Expert Solution & Answer
Want to see the full answer?
Check out a sample textbook solutionStudents have asked these similar questions
Which one of the following economists believed imposing taxes on imports and exports must be at a moderate level in order to prevent smuggling
A. Michael Porter
B. David Ricardo
C. Adam Smith
Potato SA's head of marketing Willie Jacobs has explained that the practice of potato dumping holds some harmful consequences. These include further economic decline and hitting where it hurts most, the livelihoods of South African farmers and workers and their families. He added that irregular imports are detrimental to a viable local economy; hence the implementation of consistent anti-dumping measures is essential." If demand theory is used to explain why South African farmers feel their businesses are under threat, it is because they believe that... A. They would have to sell their produce at a low price resulting in losses. B. They are expecting prices to rise in the future. C. There is not enough demand for potatoes in the market. D. The dumped potatoes shift the supply curve outwards resulting in price that is too high for consumers to afford.
If the United States is currently importing 14 million barrels per day at a world price of $4.00 per unit (the entire amount consumed), what is the effect on imports of a tax equal to $8.00 per unit?
Price
per
Barrel
Quantity of Barrels
Supplied
(Millions)
Quantity of Barrels
Demanded
(Millions)
$4
0
14
8
12
16
20
24
28
Using the table above, after the imposition of the $8.00 per-unit tax, the new quantity supplied is
number.)
2
4
6
8
10
12
13
12
11
10
9
8
million barrels and the new quantity demanded is million barrels. (Enter your responses as a whole
Chapter 10 Solutions
Microeconomics
Ch. 10.1 - Prob. 1QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 2QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 3QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 4QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 5QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 6QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 7QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 8QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 9QCh. 10.1 - Prob. 10Q
Ch. 10 - Prob. 1QECh. 10 - Prob. 2QECh. 10 - Prob. 3QECh. 10 - Prob. 4QECh. 10 - Prob. 5QECh. 10 - Prob. 6QECh. 10 - Prob. 7QECh. 10 - Prob. 8QECh. 10 - Prob. 9QECh. 10 - Prob. 10QECh. 10 - Prob. 11QECh. 10 - Prob. 12QECh. 10 - Prob. 13QECh. 10 - Prob. 1QAPCh. 10 - Prob. 2QAPCh. 10 - Prob. 3QAPCh. 10 - Prob. 4QAPCh. 10 - Prob. 5QAPCh. 10 - Prob. 1IPCh. 10 - Prob. 2IPCh. 10 - Prob. 3IPCh. 10 - Prob. 4IPCh. 10 - Prob. 5IPCh. 10 - Prob. 6IPCh. 10 - Prob. 7IPCh. 10 - Prob. 8IP
Knowledge Booster
Similar questions
- If the United States is currently importing 14 million barrels per day at a world price of $4.00 per unit (the entire amount consumed), what is the effect on imports of a tax equal to $12.00 per unit? Quantity of Barrels Supplied Quantity of Barrels Demanded Price per Barrel (Millions) (Millions) $4 0 14 8 2 13 12 4 12 16 6 11 20 8 10 24 28 10 12 9 8 Using the table above, after the imposition of the $12.00 per-unit tax, the new quantity supplied is million barrels and the new quantity demanded is ☐ million barrels. (Enter your responses as a whole number.)arrow_forwardThe U.S. is an importer of ethanol, and let’s assume they are a price-taker in the world market. Suppose that a technological advance in ethanol production in Brazil, the world’s largest exporter, drives down the world price of ethanol by $5. Draw a graph and explain how this change in world price affects consumer surplus, producer surplus, and total surplus in the U.S. market. Now suppose the U.S. government institutes an import tariff of $5 in response to the fall in the world price. On your graph label the revenue raised by the tariff and the deadweight loss created (if it exists). Who is likely to support this policy? Suppose that the fall in price is attributable not to a technological advance but to a subsidy from the Brazilian government to Brazilian ethanol producers. How would this affect your analysis?arrow_forwardIn the picture below is the full question. The highlighted one is my guess which is wrong. Which of the following best explains how subsidies work as a trade restriction? A)They increase competition for a new business, forcing it to be more productive, and lowering prices for consumers. B)They limit the import of foreign goods and create shortages. C)They place a tax on foreign goods, making foreign good expensive, increasing demand for domestic goods(this one is wrong) D)Governments pay producers, offsetting costs, increasing supply, lowering prices, and reducing foreign competition.arrow_forward
- Under what circumstances can a state impose a tax on goods that are imported into the state from another nation?arrow_forward5. Agricultural export subsidies in a small nation The following graph shows the market for wheat in Canada, where Do is the demand curve, Sc is the supply curve, and Pw is the free trade price of wheat. Assume that Canada is a relatively small producer of wheat, so changes in its output do not affect the world price of wheat. Also assume that Canada is currently open to free trade, and domestic consumers are able to purchase wheat at the world price with negligible transportation costs. Suppose a subsidy of $80 per ton is granted to exporters in Canada, allowing them to sell their products abroad at prices below their costs. Assume that trade restrictions are also put in place in order to prevent domestic consumers from buying wheat abroad at the world price. Use the grey line (star symbols) to indicate the world price of wheat plus the subsidy on the following graph. Then use the black point (plus symbol) to indicate the price of wheat in Canada and the quantity demanded at that…arrow_forwardConsider a small country that exports steel. Suppose that a “pro-trade” government decides to subsidize the export of steel by paying a certain amount for each ton sold abroad. How does this export subsidy affect the domestic price of steel, the quantity of steel consumed, and the quantity of steel exported? How does it affect consumer surplus, producer surplus and government revenue? (Hint: The analysis of an export subsidy is like the analysis of a tariff.)arrow_forward
- Evaluate this statement: “If the United States imposed a uniform excise tariff on all foreign imports, all U.S. businesses and workers would benefit. Consequently, if a bill to impose a uniform excise tariff were introduced in the U.S. Congress, it would unanimously pass.”arrow_forwardShow and explain by graphs the gains and losses to producers, consumers, and the government for a small country if it imposes an export tax; illustrate your answer with examples why a small exporting country will never gain from an export tax. Please draw it out, I am a visual learnerarrow_forwardSmall Island Developing States (SIDS), particularly our Caribbean islands, are normally accused by our economists of being import dependent. Why then are we always hesitant to impose Tariffs on imports to solve our Balance of Payments problems? Why would it be slow to work on our appetites? Discuss this issue in relation to the concept of Elasticity of Demand. Also, why is the Government always imposing more and more sin taxes on alcohol and cigarettes? Is the Government so concerned about our sins when we consume these demerit goods?arrow_forward
- In 1932, U.S. manufacturers, which used to enjoy steady relationships with their foreign distributors and export nearly 60% of their output, realized that their exports had fallen to only 20% of total output. Which of the following is the most likely reason for this decrease in exports? O The low quality of U.S. products O war between the United States and Canada O Retaliatory tariffs by trading partners The signing of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947 resulted in the adoption of several new trade policies. In the following table, indicate if each of the policies listed was a result of GATT. Then, complete the last column by identifying the means by which each GATT policy was implemented. Policy GATT Policy Implementation Promotion of protectionism Clear and public trade rules Promotion of lower trade barriers Yes v Institution of the WTO Promotion of trade transparency Settling trade disputes In the 1960s, multilateral negotiations called the Uruguay Round…arrow_forwardEconomics 4. Depict on graph and briefly explain economic consequences of export subsidy: • for domestic exporters; • for domestic consumers; • for government budget; • for national economic welfare as a whole.arrow_forward1) https://openstax.org/books/principles-macroeconomics-2e/pages/21-1-protectionism-an-indirect-subsidy-from-consumers-to-producers 2) https://openstax.org/books/principles-macroeconomics-2e/pages/21-2-international-trade-and-its-effects-on-jobs-wages-and-working-conditions 3) https://openstax.org/books/principles-macroeconomics-2e/pages/21-3-arguments-in-support-of-restricting-imports 4) https://openstax.org/books/principles-macroeconomics-2e/pages/21-4-how-governments-enact-trade-policy-globally-regionally-and-nationally 5) https://openstax.org/books/principles-macroeconomics-2e/pages/21-5-the-tradeoffs-of-trade-policy I need a short summary for these articles, please.arrow_forward
arrow_back_ios
SEE MORE QUESTIONS
arrow_forward_ios
Recommended textbooks for you
- Principles of Economics 2eEconomicsISBN:9781947172364Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David ShapiroPublisher:OpenStax
Principles of Economics 2e
Economics
ISBN:9781947172364
Author:Steven A. Greenlaw; David Shapiro
Publisher:OpenStax